GSD-2017-20190

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2024-04-03 05:01
Details
** DISPUTED ** Some Microsoft technologies as used in Windows 8 through 11 allow a temporary client-side performance degradation during processing of multiple Unicode combining characters, aka a "Zalgo text" attack. NOTE: third parties dispute whether the computational cost of interpreting Unicode data should be considered a vulnerability.
Aliases
To clipboard 

{
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2017-20190"
      ],
      "details": "** DISPUTED ** Some Microsoft technologies as used in Windows 8 through 11 allow a temporary client-side performance degradation during processing of multiple Unicode combining characters, aka a \"Zalgo text\" attack. NOTE: third parties dispute whether the computational cost of interpreting Unicode data should be considered a vulnerability.",
      "id": "GSD-2017-20190",
      "modified": "2024-04-03T05:01:52.865858Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2017-20190",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "** DISPUTED ** Some Microsoft technologies as used in Windows 8 through 11 allow a temporary client-side performance degradation during processing of multiple Unicode combining characters, aka a \"Zalgo text\" attack. NOTE: third parties dispute whether the computational cost of interpreting Unicode data should be considered a vulnerability."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AC:L/AV:L/A:N/C:N/I:N/PR:N/S:U/UI:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        }
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://talk.dynalist.io/t/dynalist-is-vulnerable-to-zalgo/1234",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://talk.dynalist.io/t/dynalist-is-vulnerable-to-zalgo/1234"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zalgo_text",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zalgo_text"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://aka.ms/windowsbugbar",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://aka.ms/windowsbugbar"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "Some Microsoft technologies as used in Windows 8 through 11 allow a temporary client-side performance degradation during processing of multiple Unicode combining characters, aka a \"Zalgo text\" attack. NOTE: third parties dispute whether the computational cost of interpreting Unicode data should be considered a vulnerability."
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Algunas tecnolog\u00edas de Microsoft utilizadas en Windows 8 a 11 permiten una degradaci\u00f3n temporal del rendimiento del lado del cliente durante el procesamiento de m\u00faltiples caracteres combinados Unicode, tambi\u00e9n conocido como ataque de \"texto Zalgo\". NOTA: los terceros cuestionan si el costo computacional de interpretar los datos Unicode debe considerarse una vulnerabilidad."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2017-20190",
        "lastModified": "2024-04-11T00:58:25.590",
        "metrics": {},
        "published": "2024-03-27T00:15:07.580",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "url": "https://aka.ms/windowsbugbar"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zalgo_text"
          },
          {
            "source": "cve@mitre.org",
            "url": "https://talk.dynalist.io/t/dynalist-is-vulnerable-to-zalgo/1234"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis"
      }
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.