GHSA-R53P-7PC4-XJ5R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-29 18:22 – Updated: 2026-09-29 18:22Impact
Undici's interceptors.retry() can resume a request after a partial response and append the resumed bytes to an already partially delivered body, while the application still receives the original response's status and headers. When that response carried a Content-Length, the application can receive a longer body. Applications that forward Undici's status, headers, and body downstream without recalculating framing, for example proxy or gateway applications, may emit a response whose body exceeds the forwarded Content-Length, and the excess bytes can be read as the start of a subsequent HTTP response (downstream response splitting or desynchronization).
For example, a 404 Not Found with Content-Length: 2 that sends one byte then closes can be resumed with an open-ended Range request, and the resumed 206 Partial Content bytes are appended, so the application receives more than two body bytes while still seeing Content-Length: 2. The bug requires interceptors.retry() enabled, an attacker-controlled or faulty upstream, and a downstream forwarder that does not recalculate Content-Length.
Patches
Patched in undici v6.28.1, v7.29.1, and v8.10.2. Upgrade to one of these or later.
Workarounds
- Disable
interceptors.retry()for untrusted upstreams, or setmaxRetries: 0. - Remove or recalculate
Content-Lengthbefore forwarding a response body assembled by Undici.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "6.28.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "7.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.29.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "undici"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "8.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "8.10.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-18540"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-444"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-29T18:22:07Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-04T18:17:50Z",
"severity": "LOW"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nUndici\u0027s `interceptors.retry()` can resume a request after a partial response and append the resumed bytes to an already partially delivered body, while the application still receives the original response\u0027s status and headers. When that response carried a `Content-Length`, the application can receive a longer body. Applications that forward Undici\u0027s status, headers, and body downstream without recalculating framing, for example proxy or gateway applications, may emit a response whose body exceeds the forwarded `Content-Length`, and the excess bytes can be read as the start of a subsequent HTTP response (downstream response splitting or desynchronization).\n\nFor example, a `404 Not Found` with `Content-Length: 2` that sends one byte then closes can be resumed with an open-ended `Range` request, and the resumed `206 Partial Content` bytes are appended, so the application receives more than two body bytes while still seeing `Content-Length: 2`. The bug requires `interceptors.retry()` enabled, an attacker-controlled or faulty upstream, and a downstream forwarder that does not recalculate `Content-Length`.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in undici v6.28.1, v7.29.1, and v8.10.2. Upgrade to one of these or later.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- Disable `interceptors.retry()` for untrusted upstreams, or set `maxRetries: 0`.\n- Remove or recalculate `Content-Length` before forwarding a response body assembled by Undici.",
"id": "GHSA-r53p-7pc4-xj5r",
"modified": "2026-09-29T18:22:07Z",
"published": "2026-09-29T18:22:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-r53p-7pc4-xj5r"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18540"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/0160a719063fb0a77f4fdf9500b9166b91e14329"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/cd8af90b38ae33c2838d54a2d629774122effe95"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/ce31bc824b578008faae5d3350da66c1b5f71548"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3900104"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/3900615"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v6.28.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v7.29.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/nodejs/undici/releases/tag/v8.10.2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "undici vulnerable to downstream response splitting via retry interceptor"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.