CWE-670
Allowed-with-ReviewAlways-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
Abstraction: Class · Status: Draft
The code contains a control flow path that does not reflect the algorithm that the path is intended to implement, leading to incorrect behavior any time this path is navigated.
223 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-102124 (GCVE-0-2026-102124)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-30 20:15 – Updated: 2026-10-01 13:37| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/kiteworks/security-advisories/… | vendor-advisory |
| https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/de… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-102124",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-01T13:22:53.082519Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-01T13:37:04.795Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Core",
"vendor": "Kiteworks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.5.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "9.5.0"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Icare, https://yeswehack.com/hunters/icare"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Supr4s, https://yeswehack.com/hunters/Supr4s"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "wlayzz, https://yeswehack.com/hunters/wlayzz"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "truff, https://yeswehack.com/hunters/truff"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "A Kiteworks appliance setup interface did not enforce authentication once the appliance had completed initial configuration. An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the appliance could read and modify a limited set of setup records, including a contact name and email address captured during initial configuration."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "CWE-670 Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T20:15:38.627Z",
"orgId": "9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725",
"shortName": "cisa-cg"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "url",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kiteworks/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-q85p-q4v6-7w6f"
},
{
"name": "url",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/VA/white/2026/va-26-274-01.json"
}
],
"title": "Kiteworks Core Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "VINCE-NT 1.15.0+build.145"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725",
"assignerShortName": "cisa-cg",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-102124",
"datePublished": "2026-09-30T20:15:38.627Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-28T17:39:13.563Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-01T13:37:04.795Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-102110 (GCVE-0-2026-102110)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-30 20:21 – Updated: 2026-10-01 13:37| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/kiteworks/security-advisories/… | vendor-advisory |
| https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/de… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-102110",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-01T13:19:49.178577Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-01T13:37:01.683Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Core",
"vendor": "Kiteworks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.5.1",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "9.5.1"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-30T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "An endpoint used during initial appliance setup did not require authentication and did not correctly enforce its intended state precondition, so during the initial activation window an unauthenticated network attacker could repeatedly re-trigger the privileged activation process. This could disrupt setup and leave the appliance in an incompletely configured state. The issue is only reachable while an appliance is being activated for the first time and not yet fully configured."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-306",
"description": "CWE-306 Missing Authentication for Critical Function",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "CWE-670 Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-30T20:21:42.338Z",
"orgId": "9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725",
"shortName": "cisa-cg"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "url",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kiteworks/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-qfqh-c638-m5pg"
},
{
"name": "url",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cisagov/CSAF/develop/csaf_files/VA/white/2026/va-26-274-01.json"
}
],
"title": "Missing authentication on a Kiteworks appliance setup function",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "VINCE-NT 1.15.0+build.145"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725",
"assignerShortName": "cisa-cg",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-102110",
"datePublished": "2026-09-30T20:21:42.338Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-28T17:39:13.562Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-01T13:37:01.683Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-92932 (GCVE-0-2026-92932)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-17 12:33 – Updated: 2026-09-17 18:30| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/MISP/sachertortephp/commit/1c2… | patch |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| misp | sachertortephp |
Affected:
0 , < 1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac
(semver)
|
qwen3.8:27b
advisory
bcp-05-x-01bcp-05-x-02
Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.
| Model | Source | Identifier |
|---|---|---|
| qwen3.8:27b | ollama | qwen3.8:27b |
- Generator
-
patch2vuln.pyon 2026-09-17 12:27 - Model
qwen3.8:27b- Input
-
https://github.com/MISP/sachertortephp/commit/1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac.patch
a5f13eb5fbce… - Confidence
- medium
| Commit | Subject | Patch SHA-256 |
|---|---|---|
1c2da20cbe3f
|
fix: [security] Gate the https branch of Xml::build() on | a5f13eb5fbce… |
Fix summary
The fix corrects the operator-precedence error by adding parentheses around the scheme check so that both the http:// and https:// branches are gated by the $options['readFile'] flag. After the fix, when readFile is false, neither scheme triggers a network fetch, restoring the caller's intended control over remote reads and eliminating the SSRF vector.
Patch summary
In lib/Cake/Utility/Xml.php, line 110, the condition $options['readFile'] && strpos($input, 'http://') === 0 || strpos($input, 'https://') === 0 is changed to $options['readFile'] && (strpos($input, 'http://') === 0 || strpos($input, 'https://') === 0). A single pair of parentheses is added around the two strpos comparisons so that the || is evaluated before the &&, ensuring the readFile flag gates both URL schemes. One line changed: 1 insertion, 1 deletion.
CVSS rationale
AV:N: the vulnerable function is a library utility reachable through network-facing application code. AC:L: the attacker only needs to supply an input string starting with https://; no race or complex condition is required. AT:N: no need to bypass security controls. PR:N: assumed no authentication is required to reach the code path (assumption; if the calling application requires auth, PR should be raised). UI:N: no user interaction needed. VC/VI/VA:N: the local application's own confidentiality, integrity, and availability are not directly compromised. SC:L: the attacker can read the HTTP response body from the fetched URL (information disclosure from the SSRF target), which is a limited impact on the target system's confidentiality. SI/SA:N: no integrity or availability impact on the target. The vector reflects a low-complexity SSRF with limited confidentiality impact on the remote target.
Weakness rationale
- CWE-918 The primary security impact is that the application issues an outbound HTTPS request to an attacker-influenced URL when the caller intended to disable remote reads. The HttpSocket follows up to 10 redirects, amplifying the SSRF surface. The response is parsed and potentially returned, enabling information disclosure from internal or external targets.
- CWE-670 The root cause is a logic error: the conditional expression does not implement the intended control flow because of PHP operator precedence. The readFile gate is bypassed for the https:// branch, making the guard ineffective for that scheme. This is the underlying defect that produces the SSRF.
Attack pattern rationale
- CAPEC-66 The closest CAPEC is SSRF: an attacker supplies a URL (https://...) as input to a server-side function, and the server fetches it over the network. The patch confirms the code path performs an HttpSocket GET with redirect-following. The uncertainty is that the exact attack vector depends on how the calling application exposes Xml::build() input; the CAPEC mapping is based on the confirmed code behavior of fetching a caller-supplied URL.
Assumptions to verify
- PR:N is assumed; if the calling application requires authentication to reach Xml::build() with attacker-controlled input, the PR metric should be raised to PR:L or higher.
- The affected version range is unspecified because the patch metadata does not include version tags or release boundaries.
- The CAPEC-66 mapping is the closest available pattern; the exact exploitation context (which MISP endpoint or API exposes Xml::build() input) is not specified in the patch.
- The HttpSocket redirect-following (up to 10 redirects) amplifies the SSRF surface but is not separately scored; it is subsumed under the SC:L impact.
- The vulnerability requires the readFile option to be set to false; if all callers use the default (presumably true), the practical exploitability may be reduced, but the code still contains the logic defect.
Model comparison
Selected qwen3.8:27b
by deterministic-consensus-v1
The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required.
| Model | Score | Agreement | Confidence | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
qwen3.8:27b |
5 | 9 | medium | 5 |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-92932",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-17T18:29:40.334689Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T18:30:42.720Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"lib/Cake/Utility/Xml.php"
],
"product": "sachertortephp",
"programFiles": [
"lib/Cake/Utility/Xml.php"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/MISP/sachertortephp",
"vendor": "misp",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "iglocska"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "iglocska"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eIn the MISP sachertortephp library, the Xml::build() static method in lib/Cake/Utility/Xml.php contains a logic error in the conditional that gates network-based XML fetching. The original condition was written as: $options[\u0027readFile\u0027] \u0026amp;\u0026amp; strpos($input, \u0027http://\u0027) === 0 || strpos($input, \u0027https://\u0027) === 0. Because PHP\u0027s \u0026amp;\u0026amp; operator has higher precedence than ||, the expression is evaluated as ($options[\u0027readFile\u0027] \u0026amp;\u0026amp; strpos($input, \u0027http://\u0027) === 0) || strpos($input, \u0027https://\u0027) === 0. As a result, when a caller explicitly sets the readFile option to false to disable file and URL reading, an input string beginning with https:// still satisfies the condition and triggers a network fetch via HttpSocket (configured to follow up to 10 redirects). The http:// branch is correctly gated by the readFile flag, but the https:// branch is not. An attacker who can influence the $input parameter passed to Xml::build() can therefore force the application to issue an outbound HTTPS request to an attacker-controlled or internal URL, even though the caller intended to suppress all remote reads. The fetched response is parsed as XML and may be returned to the caller, enabling information disclosure from internal services or external targets. This constitutes a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) weakness with an information-disclosure impact. The vulnerability requires that the code path in Xml::build() be reachable with attacker-controlled input and that the readFile option be set to false (or the caller expects it to be false).\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "In the MISP sachertortephp library, the Xml::build() static method in lib/Cake/Utility/Xml.php contains a logic error in the conditional that gates network-based XML fetching. The original condition was written as: $options[\u0027readFile\u0027] \u0026\u0026 strpos($input, \u0027http://\u0027) === 0 || strpos($input, \u0027https://\u0027) === 0. Because PHP\u0027s \u0026\u0026 operator has higher precedence than ||, the expression is evaluated as ($options[\u0027readFile\u0027] \u0026\u0026 strpos($input, \u0027http://\u0027) === 0) || strpos($input, \u0027https://\u0027) === 0. As a result, when a caller explicitly sets the readFile option to false to disable file and URL reading, an input string beginning with https:// still satisfies the condition and triggers a network fetch via HttpSocket (configured to follow up to 10 redirects). The http:// branch is correctly gated by the readFile flag, but the https:// branch is not. An attacker who can influence the $input parameter passed to Xml::build() can therefore force the application to issue an outbound HTTPS request to an attacker-controlled or internal URL, even though the caller intended to suppress all remote reads. The fetched response is parsed as XML and may be returned to the caller, enabling information disclosure from internal services or external targets. This constitutes a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) weakness with an information-disclosure impact. The vulnerability requires that the code path in Xml::build() be reachable with attacker-controlled input and that the readFile option be set to false (or the caller expects it to be false)."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-66",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-66 Server Side Request Forgery"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "CWE-670 Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T12:42:02.501Z",
"orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
"shortName": "CIRCL"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Security patch",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/sachertortephp/commit/1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe fix corrects the operator-precedence error by adding parentheses around the scheme check so that both the http:// and https:// branches are gated by the $options[\u0027readFile\u0027] flag. After the fix, when readFile is false, neither scheme triggers a network fetch, restoring the caller\u0027s intended control over remote reads and eliminating the SSRF vector.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The fix corrects the operator-precedence error by adding parentheses around the scheme check so that both the http:// and https:// branches are gated by the $options[\u0027readFile\u0027] flag. After the fix, when readFile is false, neither scheme triggers a network fetch, restoring the caller\u0027s intended control over remote reads and eliminating the SSRF vector."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "MISP sachertortephp Xml::build() Operator Precedence Bypass Allows Unintended HTTPS SSRF When readFile Is Disabled",
"x_gcve": [
{
"extensions": {
"bcp-05-x-01": {
"ai_annotations": [
{
"ai_level": "generated",
"description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
"gna_source": 1,
"models": [
{
"gna_source": 1,
"identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
"name": "qwen3.8:27b",
"source": "ollama"
}
],
"review_status": "full",
"scope": "record",
"tags": [
"ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
"ai-computer-assisted:classification"
]
}
]
},
"bcp-05-x-02": {
"x_patch2vuln": {
"assumptions": [
"PR:N is assumed; if the calling application requires authentication to reach Xml::build() with attacker-controlled input, the PR metric should be raised to PR:L or higher.",
"The affected version range is unspecified because the patch metadata does not include version tags or release boundaries.",
"The CAPEC-66 mapping is the closest available pattern; the exact exploitation context (which MISP endpoint or API exposes Xml::build() input) is not specified in the patch.",
"The HttpSocket redirect-following (up to 10 redirects) amplifies the SSRF surface but is not separately scored; it is subsumed under the SC:L impact.",
"The vulnerability requires the readFile option to be set to false; if all callers use the default (presumably true), the practical exploitability may be reduced, but the code still contains the logic defect."
],
"capecRationale": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-66",
"rationale": "The closest CAPEC is SSRF: an attacker supplies a URL (https://...) as input to a server-side function, and the server fetches it over the network. The patch confirms the code path performs an HttpSocket GET with redirect-following. The uncertainty is that the exact attack vector depends on how the calling application exposes Xml::build() input; the CAPEC mapping is based on the confirmed code behavior of fetching a caller-supplied URL."
}
],
"commit": "1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac",
"confidence": "medium",
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "iglocska"
}
],
"cvssRationale": "AV:N: the vulnerable function is a library utility reachable through network-facing application code. AC:L: the attacker only needs to supply an input string starting with https://; no race or complex condition is required. AT:N: no need to bypass security controls. PR:N: assumed no authentication is required to reach the code path (assumption; if the calling application requires auth, PR should be raised). UI:N: no user interaction needed. VC/VI/VA:N: the local application\u0027s own confidentiality, integrity, and availability are not directly compromised. SC:L: the attacker can read the HTTP response body from the fetched URL (information disclosure from the SSRF target), which is a limited impact on the target system\u0027s confidentiality. SI/SA:N: no integrity or availability impact on the target. The vector reflects a low-complexity SSRF with limited confidentiality impact on the remote target.",
"fixSummary": "The fix corrects the operator-precedence error by adding parentheses around the scheme check so that both the http:// and https:// branches are gated by the $options[\u0027readFile\u0027] flag. After the fix, when readFile is false, neither scheme triggers a network fetch, restoring the caller\u0027s intended control over remote reads and eliminating the SSRF vector.",
"generatedAt": "2026-09-17T12:27:24.482336Z",
"generator": "patch2vuln.py",
"model": "qwen3.8:27b",
"modelComparison": {
"rankings": [
{
"agreementScore": 9,
"assumptionCount": 5,
"confidence": "medium",
"model": "qwen3.8:27b",
"score": 5
}
],
"selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
"selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
"selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
},
"patchSha256": "a5f13eb5fbceae218145d722667feb055f471f151ea64de8acd0257358816af6",
"patchSummary": "In lib/Cake/Utility/Xml.php, line 110, the condition $options[\u0027readFile\u0027] \u0026\u0026 strpos($input, \u0027http://\u0027) === 0 || strpos($input, \u0027https://\u0027) === 0 is changed to $options[\u0027readFile\u0027] \u0026\u0026 (strpos($input, \u0027http://\u0027) === 0 || strpos($input, \u0027https://\u0027) === 0). A single pair of parentheses is added around the two strpos comparisons so that the || is evaluated before the \u0026\u0026, ensuring the readFile flag gates both URL schemes. One line changed: 1 insertion, 1 deletion.",
"patchTruncated": false,
"patches": [
{
"commit": "1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac",
"patchSha256": "a5f13eb5fbceae218145d722667feb055f471f151ea64de8acd0257358816af6",
"source": "https://github.com/MISP/sachertortephp/commit/1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac.patch",
"sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/sachertortephp/commit/1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac.patch",
"subject": "fix: [security] Gate the https branch of Xml::build() on"
}
],
"source": "https://github.com/MISP/sachertortephp/commit/1c2da20cbe3f1e2a91458fe9a017823b7273fdac.patch",
"subject": "fix: [security] Gate the https branch of Xml::build() on",
"weaknessRationale": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"rationale": "The primary security impact is that the application issues an outbound HTTPS request to an attacker-influenced URL when the caller intended to disable remote reads. The HttpSocket follows up to 10 redirects, amplifying the SSRF surface. The response is parsed and potentially returned, enabling information disclosure from internal or external targets."
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"rationale": "The root cause is a logic error: the conditional expression does not implement the intended control flow because of PHP operator precedence. The readFile gate is bypassed for the https:// branch, making the guard ineffective for that scheme. This is the underlying defect that produces the SSRF."
}
]
}
}
},
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "gcve-1-2026-20250"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
"assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-92932",
"datePublished": "2026-09-17T12:33:44.852Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-17T12:33:35.124Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-17T18:30:42.720Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-73468 (GCVE-0-2026-73468)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-09-16 09:55 – Updated: 2026-09-16 13:37- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-noti… | vendor-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arista Networks | EOS |
Affected:
1.0.0 , < 4.33.0F
(custom)
Affected: 4.33.0F , ≤ 4.33.8M (custom) Affected: 4.34.0F , ≤ 4.34.7.1M (custom) Affected: 4.35.0F , ≤ 4.35.5M (custom) Affected: 4.36.0F , ≤ 4.36.1F (custom) |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-73468",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-16T13:36:14.973508Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T13:37:56.689Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "EOS",
"vendor": "Arista Networks",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "4.33.0F",
"status": "affected",
"version": "1.0.0",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.33.8M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.33.0F",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.34.7.1M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.34.0F",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.35.5M",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.35.0F",
"versionType": "custom"
},
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "4.36.1F",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.36.0F",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe vulnerability is exploitable on interfaces with PIM Sparse Mode configured:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cpre\u003e\nswitch(config)# interface Ethernet1\nswitch(config-if-Et1)# pim ipv4 sparse-mode\n\u003c/pre\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The vulnerability is exploitable on interfaces with PIM Sparse Mode configured:\n\nswitch(config)# interface Ethernet1\nswitch(config-if-Et1)# pim ipv4 sparse-mode"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-09-09T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eA specially crafted packet can cause the premature expiry of multicast forwarding state on affected interfaces, potentially resulting in temporary multicast traffic loss during the affected period.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "A specially crafted packet can cause the premature expiry of multicast forwarding state on affected interfaces, potentially resulting in temporary multicast traffic loss during the affected period."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-272",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-272 Protocol Manipulation"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L",
"version": "4.0"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "CWE-670 Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T09:55:17.069Z",
"orgId": "c8b34d1a-69ae-45c3-88fe-f3b3d44f39b7",
"shortName": "Arista"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisory/24731-security-advisory-0175"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThe following EOS releases contain the fix:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e4.33.9M and later in the 4.33.x train\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e4.34.8M and later in the 4.34.x train\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e4.35.6M and later in the 4.35.x train\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e4.36.2F and later in the 4.36.x train\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNo hotfixes are available for this issue.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The following EOS releases contain the fix:\n- 4.33.9M and later in the 4.33.x train\n- 4.34.8M and later in the 4.34.x train\n- 4.35.6M and later in the 4.35.x train\n- 4.36.2F and later in the 4.36.x train\n\nNo hotfixes are available for this issue."
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "Security Advisory 0175",
"defects": [
"BUG1857585"
],
"discovery": "INTERNAL"
},
"title": "Security Advisory 0175",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eThere is no mitigation available to address this vulnerability.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "There is no mitigation available to address this vulnerability."
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c8b34d1a-69ae-45c3-88fe-f3b3d44f39b7",
"assignerShortName": "Arista",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-73468",
"datePublished": "2026-09-16T09:55:17.069Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-12T16:47:18.121Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-16T13:37:56.689Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-73283 (GCVE-0-2026-73283)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-11 19:15 – Updated: 2026-08-11 20:16- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-73283",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-11T20:16:49.734390Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-11T20:16:58.787Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "OpenSSH",
"vendor": "OpenBSD",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "10.5",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:openbsd:openssh:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "10.5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "In sshd in OpenSSH before 10.5, the restrict keyword (in authorized_keys) was supposed to be applicable to tunnel forwarding but was not."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.5,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "CWE-670 Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-11T19:15:24.335Z",
"orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"shortName": "mitre"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.openssh.org/releasenotes.html#10.5"
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "CVE-Request-form 0.0.1"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
"assignerShortName": "mitre",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-73283",
"datePublished": "2026-08-11T19:15:24.335Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-11T19:15:24.007Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-11T20:16:58.787Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-72705 (GCVE-0-2026-72705)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-24 20:08 – Updated: 2026-09-24 14:18- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq | product |
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/issues/21683 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/pull/21684 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/endrazine/rocq-cve-poc-21683 | exploit |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rocq-prover-… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rocq-prover | rocq |
Affected:
0 , < 9.2.0
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-72705",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-26T15:46:51.503814Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T16:13:14.137Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/rocq-prover/rocq",
"product": "rocq",
"repo": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq",
"vendor": "rocq-prover",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.2.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Tristan St\u00e9rin"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jonathan Brossard (MOABI)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The guard checker in Rocq Prover does not follow recursive calls made through a fixpoint\u0027s own arguments. A fixpoint may pass itself as a higher-order argument to a second fixpoint, which then applies it to a value that is not a subterm of the structural argument. Passing the recursive function to a plain definition is rejected because the checker unfolds the definition and observes the call, but passing it to a fixpoint is accepted because higher-order recursive calls through fixpoint arguments are not tracked. This admits a type that is definitionally equal to its own negation, so self-application produces False in purely definitional code, without tactics, axioms, plugins or unsafe flags, and Print Assumptions reports the result as closed under the global context. Fixed in Rocq 9.2.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:18:52.758Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/issues/21683"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/pull/21684"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/endrazine/rocq-cve-poc-21683"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Rocq Prover before 9.2.0 Guard Checker Accepts Fixpoint Passed as a Higher-Order Argument",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rocq-prover-before-guard-checker-accepts-fixpoint-passed-as-a-higher-order-argument"
}
],
"title": "Rocq Prover before 9.2.0 Guard Checker Accepts Fixpoint Passed as a Higher-Order Argument",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-72705",
"datePublished": "2026-08-24T20:08:32.535Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-10T13:02:52.001Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:18:52.758Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-72704 (GCVE-0-2026-72704)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-24 20:08 – Updated: 2026-09-24 14:18- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq | product |
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/issues/22024 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/pull/22027 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/endrazine/rocq-cve-poc-22024 | exploit |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rocq-prover-… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rocq-prover | rocq |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 9.2.0
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-72704",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-25T16:37:22.786826Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-25T16:38:12.987Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/rocq-prover/rocq",
"product": "rocq",
"repo": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq",
"vendor": "rocq-prover",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "9.2.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Yann Leray"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jonathan Brossard (MOABI)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-13T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The guard checker in Rocq Prover does not recheck the recursive tree representation of an inductive type parameter after that parameter has been changed by transport. A fixpoint may apply a rewrite along an equality between types to its recursive argument, which the guard checker accepts because the inductive type is preserved, while the recursive tree recorded for the parameter is altered. A second fixpoint that calls the first inherits the altered recursive tree without verification, so a call that is not structurally decreasing is accepted as terminating. The resulting non-terminating definition proves that a natural number equals its own successor and therefore False, from which any proposition follows. The demonstration uses two axioms that follow from univalence and are consistent with the calculus of inductive constructions, so the contradiction comes from the guard check rather than from the assumptions. A fix is proposed but not merged."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:18:51.836Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/issues/22024"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/pull/22027"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/endrazine/rocq-cve-poc-22024"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Rocq Prover through 9.2.0 Guard Checker Trusts Corrupted Recursive Tree After Transport",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rocq-prover-through-guard-checker-trusts-corrupted-recursive-tree-after-transport"
}
],
"title": "Rocq Prover through 9.2.0 Guard Checker Trusts Corrupted Recursive Tree After Transport",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-72704",
"datePublished": "2026-08-24T20:08:31.787Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-10T13:02:20.829Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:18:51.836Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-72703 (GCVE-0-2026-72703)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-24 20:08 – Updated: 2026-09-24 14:18- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq | product |
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/issues/21682 | issue-tracking |
| https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/pull/21684 | issue-trackingpatch |
| https://github.com/endrazine/rocq-cve-poc-21682 | exploit |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rocq-prover-… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rocq-prover | rocq |
Affected:
8.20 , < 9.2.0
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-72703",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-27T14:12:25.906004Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-27T14:12:34.453Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/rocq-prover/rocq",
"product": "rocq",
"repo": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq",
"vendor": "rocq-prover",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "9.2.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "8.20",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Tristan St\u00e9rin"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jonathan Brossard (MOABI)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-02-28T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The guard checker in Rocq Prover treats a parameter of a nested mutual fixpoint as uniform without examining calls between the different bodies of that fixpoint. find_uniform_parameters in kernel/inductive.ml inspects only self-recursive calls, so when no body calls itself the function concludes that every parameter is uniform. A parameter that grows through a cross-call from one body to another therefore keeps the subterm specification it inherited from the enclosing fixpoint, and a recursive call guarded by that specification is accepted although the argument is not structurally smaller. A non-terminating definition is admitted as structurally decreasing, which yields a term whose value equals its own successor and so a proof of False, from which any proposition follows. The proof requires no axioms, plugins or unsafe flags and Print Assumptions reports it as closed under the global context. Introduced in Coq 8.20 and fixed in Rocq 9.2.0."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 6.8,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "PASSIVE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:18:50.897Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/issues/21682"
},
{
"tags": [
"issue-tracking",
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/rocq-prover/rocq/pull/21684"
},
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/endrazine/rocq-cve-poc-21682"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Rocq Prover 8.20 before 9.2.0 Guard Checker Accepts Non-Terminating Fixpoint via Unchecked Cross-Calls",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rocq-prover-before-guard-checker-accepts-non-terminating-fixpoint-via-unchecked-cross-calls"
}
],
"title": "Rocq Prover 8.20 before 9.2.0 Guard Checker Accepts Non-Terminating Fixpoint via Unchecked Cross-Calls",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-72703",
"datePublished": "2026-08-24T20:08:30.607Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-10T13:02:20.829Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-24T14:18:50.897Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-56328 (GCVE-0-2026-56328)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-30 22:08 – Updated: 2026-07-01 14:28- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Cap-go/capgo/security/advisori… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/capgo-integr… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-56328",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-01T13:44:11.127460Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T14:28:26.968Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Cap-go/capgo/security/advisories/GHSA-3cmp-pm5x-8464"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "Capgo",
"vendor": "Capgo",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "12.128.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "12.128.2",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Judel777"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-07T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Capgo before 12.128.2 allows multiple public channels for the same app and platform to coexist simultaneously, while unnamed /updates requests without defaultChannel implicitly resolve to a single hidden winner channel. An authorized app or channel manager can create ambiguous default update state and silently influence which bundle unnamed clients receive, breaking release routing integrity and predictability."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.5,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-30T22:08:32.000Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-3cmp-pm5x-8464)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Cap-go/capgo/security/advisories/GHSA-3cmp-pm5x-8464"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Capgo - Integrity Issue in Release Routing via Multiple Public Channels",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/capgo-integrity-issue-in-release-routing-via-multiple-public-channels"
}
],
"title": "Capgo - Integrity Issue in Release Routing via Multiple Public Channels",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-56328",
"datePublished": "2026-06-30T22:08:32.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-20T13:06:29.994Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-01T14:28:26.968Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-56307 (GCVE-0-2026-56307)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-20 15:24 – Updated: 2026-06-22 17:26- CWE-670 - Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/Cap-go/capgo/security/advisori… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/cap-go-broke… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-56307",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-22T17:26:18.732131Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T17:26:26.936Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Cap-go/capgo/security/advisories/GHSA-8p6w-x7jg-v4xq"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "capgo",
"vendor": "Cap-go",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "12.128.12",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "12.128.12",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Judel777"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-08T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Cap-go before 12.128.12 contains a broken cursor pagination vulnerability in the /private/devices endpoint on the Cloudflare/workerd path that allows authenticated attackers to cause duplicate-page loops and make later rows unreachable. Attackers with app.read_devices access can exploit non-advancing cursor filters to trigger infinite pagination loops, prevent dataset traversal, and cause repeated processing in device-management workflows."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-670",
"description": "Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-20T15:24:47.476Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GHSA Advisory GHSA-8p6w-x7jg-v4xq",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/Cap-go/capgo/security/advisories/GHSA-8p6w-x7jg-v4xq"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Cap-go - Broken Cursor Pagination in /private/devices Endpoint",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/cap-go-broken-cursor-pagination-in-private-devices-endpoint"
}
],
"title": "Cap-go - Broken Cursor Pagination in /private/devices Endpoint",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-56307",
"datePublished": "2026-06-20T15:24:47.476Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-20T12:53:19.893Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T17:26:26.936Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
No mitigation information available for this CWE.
No CAPEC attack patterns related to this CWE.