JVNDB-2009-000071

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2009-11-04 06:27 - Updated:2009-11-04 06:27
Severity
N/A (UNKNOWN) - -
Summary
Roundcube Webmail vulnerable to cross-site request forgery
Details
Roundcube Webmail provided by Roundcube Webmail Project contains a cross-site requesst forgery vulnerability. Roundcube Webmail is an open source webmail client from the Roundcube Webmail Project. Roundcube Webmail contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability. This issue is different from JVN#33820033 and JVN#75694913. Shuya Ueki reported this vulnerability to IPA. JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2009/JVNDB-2009-000071.html",
  "dc:date": "2009-11-04T15:27+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2009-11-04T15:27+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2009-11-04T15:27+09:00",
  "description": "Roundcube Webmail provided by Roundcube Webmail Project contains a cross-site requesst forgery vulnerability.\r\n\r\nRoundcube Webmail is an open source webmail client from the Roundcube Webmail Project. Roundcube Webmail contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.\r\n\r\nThis issue is different from JVN#33820033 and JVN#75694913.\r\n\r\nShuya Ueki reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2009/JVNDB-2009-000071.html",
  "sec:cpe": {
    "#text": "cpe:/a:roundcube:roundcube_webmail",
    "@product": "Roundcube",
    "@vendor": "Roundcube.net",
    "@version": "2.2"
  },
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "2.6",
    "@severity": "Low",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2009-000071",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN72974205/index.html",
      "@id": "JVN#72974205",
      "@source": "JVN"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-4076",
      "@id": "CVE-2009-4076",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2009-4076",
      "@id": "CVE-2009-4076",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/37235",
      "@id": "SA37235",
      "@source": "SECUNIA"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.osvdb.org/59661",
      "@id": "59661",
      "@source": "OSVDB"
    },
    {
      "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
      "@id": "CWE-352",
      "@title": "Cross-Site Request Forgery(CWE-352)"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Roundcube Webmail vulnerable to cross-site request forgery"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…