GSD-2016-9456

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The Revive Adserver team conducted a security audit of the admin interface scripts in order to identify and fix other potential CSRF vulnerabilities. Over 20+ such issues were fixed.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2016-9456
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2016-9456",
    "description": "Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The Revive Adserver team conducted a security audit of the admin interface scripts in order to identify and fix other potential CSRF vulnerabilities. Over 20+ such issues were fixed.",
    "id": "GSD-2016-9456"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2016-9456"
      ],
      "details": "Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The Revive Adserver team conducted a security audit of the admin interface scripts in order to identify and fix other potential CSRF vulnerabilities. Over 20+ such issues were fixed.",
      "id": "GSD-2016-9456",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:21.834172Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "support@hackerone.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2016-9456",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Revive Adserver All versions before 3.2.3",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "Revive Adserver All versions before 3.2.3"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The Revive Adserver team conducted a security audit of the admin interface scripts in order to identify and fix other potential CSRF vulnerabilities. Over 20+ such issues were fixed."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (CWE-352)"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "83964",
            "refsource": "BID",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/83964"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/revive-adserver/revive-adserver/commit/e563ca61e4f3b7210cb61f53284adaa8aef4a49a",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/revive-adserver/revive-adserver/commit/e563ca61e4f3b7210cb61f53284adaa8aef4a49a"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2016-001/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2016-001/"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:revive-adserver:revive_adserver:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "3.2.2",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve-assignments@hackerone.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2016-9456"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "Revive Adserver before 3.2.3 suffers from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The Revive Adserver team conducted a security audit of the admin interface scripts in order to identify and fix other potential CSRF vulnerabilities. Over 20+ such issues were fixed."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-352"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2016-001/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.revive-adserver.com/security/revive-sa-2016-001/"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/revive-adserver/revive-adserver/commit/e563ca61e4f3b7210cb61f53284adaa8aef4a49a",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Issue Tracking",
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/revive-adserver/revive-adserver/commit/e563ca61e4f3b7210cb61f53284adaa8aef4a49a"
            },
            {
              "name": "83964",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/83964"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 6.8,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
          "impactScore": 6.4,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": true
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 8.8,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
          "impactScore": 5.9
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2017-03-30T01:59Z",
      "publishedDate": "2017-03-28T02:59Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.