GHSA-RPC3-43RH-HPM4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-07 18:32 – Updated: 2026-10-07 18:32
VLAI
Details

Authenticated users are able to manipulate both the SMTP envelope “Envelope-from” and “From” fields when sending emails through OVH mail servers.

Due to OVH's default SPF configuration, which commonly includes include:mx.ovh.com, any authenticated user with a valid OVH email account can send messages that appear to originate from any OVH-hosted domains using the default SPF record. Since the SPF policy explicitly authorizes OVH mail servers (mx.ovh.com) to send mail on behalf of these domains, forged messages successfully pass SPF validation despite not being authorized by the impersonated domain owner.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-33586"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-290"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-07T16:17:47Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Authenticated users are able to manipulate both the SMTP\nenvelope \u201cEnvelope-from\u201d and \u201cFrom\u201d fields when sending\nemails through OVH mail servers.\n\n\n\nDue to OVH\u0027s default SPF configuration, which\ncommonly includes include:mx.ovh.com, any authenticated user with a\nvalid OVH email account can send messages that appear to originate from any\nOVH-hosted domains using the default SPF record. Since the SPF policy\nexplicitly authorizes OVH mail servers (mx.ovh.com) to send mail on behalf of\nthese domains, forged messages successfully pass SPF validation despite\nnot being authorized by the impersonated domain owner.",
  "id": "GHSA-rpc3-43rh-hpm4",
  "modified": "2026-10-07T18:32:09Z",
  "published": "2026-10-07T18:32:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33586"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://docs.ovhcloud.com/en/guides/web-cloud/email-and-collaborative-solutions/troubleshooting/email-rejected-cross-domain-spoofing"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N/E:A/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…