GHSA-R8J5-8747-88CM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-14 20:55 – Updated: 2026-06-09 10:26
VLAI
Summary
@utcp/http: SSRF via attacker-controlled OpenAPI servers[0].url in HTTP communication protocol
Details

Summary

The @utcp/http package is vulnerable to a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) caused by a trust-boundary inconsistency between manual discovery and tool invocation. registerManual() validates the discovery URL against an HTTPS / loopback allowlist, but callTool() reuses the resolved toolCallTemplate.url directly without revalidating, and the OpenApiConverter blindly trusts whatever servers[0].url an attacker-hosted spec declares. An attacker who hosts a malicious OpenAPI spec on a legitimate HTTPS endpoint can declare e.g. servers: [{ url: "http://127.0.0.1:9090" }] or servers: [{ url: "http://169.254.169.254" }]; the converter then produces tools whose URL points at internal services on the agent host.

A separate prefix-bypass also affected the discovery-time check: the previous startsWith('http://localhost') guard let URLs like http://localhost.evil.com through.

Sister advisory

This is the npm/TypeScript counterpart of GHSA-39j6-4867-gg4w / CVE-2026-44661 on the Python utcp-http package. Same vulnerability, same fix shape, same reporter.

Versions and patch state

  • @utcp/http <= 1.1.1 — vulnerable. Both the loopback-redirect (http://127.0.0.1) and the non-loopback internal-IP variants (e.g. http://169.254.169.254, http://10.0.0.5) succeed. Note: the streamable_http and sse callToolStreaming paths in 1.1.1 are TODO placeholders and don't actually fetch URLs, so the runtime SSRF surface in these protocols is currently confined to discovery — a future implementation must also call ensureSecureUrl before issuing the request.
  • @utcp/http 1.1.2 — full fix. Runtime revalidation in callTool closes the non-loopback variants; the OpenApiConverter rejects, at conversion time, any spec fetched from a non-loopback source that declares a loopback servers[0].url, closing the loopback-redirect variant.

Impact

A remote attacker who can convince the agent (via the LLM context, prompt injection, or a tool-discovery surface) to register their HTTPS OpenAPI URL can: - Map internal networks behind the agent. - Read AWS/GCP IAM credentials from cloud metadata endpoints (http://169.254.169.254, http://metadata.google.internal). - Reach unauthenticated internal services exposed on loopback (Elasticsearch, Redis HTTP, internal admin panels, the agent's own HTTP server). - Have responses returned to the LLM, which combined with prompt injection enables exfiltration back to the attacker.

Patch

Commit on dev: 21f63e6.

New helper packages/http/src/_security.ts exposes isSecureUrl, isLoopbackUrl, ensureSecureUrl. Hostname-based validation closes the prefix bypass (http://localhost.evil.com → rejected). All three protocols' registerManual now call ensureSecureUrl(url, 'manual discovery'); callTool re-checks the resolved URL with ensureSecureUrl(url, 'tool invocation') immediately before the axios request. OpenApiConverter rejects remote spec → loopback server.

Workarounds

For users who cannot upgrade immediately: - Refuse to call registerManual with any URL controlled by an untrusted party, even over HTTPS. - Restrict outbound network access from the host running the agent so internal addresses (RFC1918, 169.254.0.0/16, loopback) are unreachable.

Credit

Discovered and reported by @YLChen-007 against the Python sibling implementation (universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp#83). The TypeScript port shared the same code shape and the same vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 1.1.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "@utcp/http"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.1.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45366"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-14T20:55:05Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-28T22:17:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nThe `@utcp/http` package is vulnerable to a blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) caused by a trust-boundary inconsistency between manual discovery and tool invocation. `registerManual()` validates the discovery URL against an HTTPS / loopback allowlist, but `callTool()` reuses the resolved `toolCallTemplate.url` directly without revalidating, and the `OpenApiConverter` blindly trusts whatever `servers[0].url` an attacker-hosted spec declares. An attacker who hosts a malicious OpenAPI spec on a legitimate HTTPS endpoint can declare e.g. `servers: [{ url: \"http://127.0.0.1:9090\" }]` or `servers: [{ url: \"http://169.254.169.254\" }]`; the converter then produces tools whose URL points at internal services on the agent host.\n\nA separate prefix-bypass also affected the discovery-time check: the previous `startsWith(\u0027http://localhost\u0027)` guard let URLs like `http://localhost.evil.com` through.\n\n## Sister advisory\n\nThis is the npm/TypeScript counterpart of [GHSA-39j6-4867-gg4w / CVE-2026-44661](https://github.com/universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp/security/advisories/GHSA-39j6-4867-gg4w) on the Python `utcp-http` package. Same vulnerability, same fix shape, same reporter.\n\n## Versions and patch state\n\n- `@utcp/http \u003c= 1.1.1` \u2014 vulnerable. Both the loopback-redirect (`http://127.0.0.1`) and the non-loopback internal-IP variants (e.g. `http://169.254.169.254`, `http://10.0.0.5`) succeed. Note: the `streamable_http` and `sse` `callToolStreaming` paths in 1.1.1 are TODO placeholders and don\u0027t actually fetch URLs, so the runtime SSRF surface in these protocols is currently confined to discovery \u2014 a future implementation must also call `ensureSecureUrl` before issuing the request.\n- `@utcp/http 1.1.2` \u2014 full fix. Runtime revalidation in `callTool` closes the non-loopback variants; the `OpenApiConverter` rejects, at conversion time, any spec fetched from a non-loopback source that declares a loopback `servers[0].url`, closing the loopback-redirect variant.\n\n## Impact\n\nA remote attacker who can convince the agent (via the LLM context, prompt injection, or a tool-discovery surface) to register their HTTPS OpenAPI URL can:\n- Map internal networks behind the agent.\n- Read AWS/GCP IAM credentials from cloud metadata endpoints (`http://169.254.169.254`, `http://metadata.google.internal`).\n- Reach unauthenticated internal services exposed on loopback (Elasticsearch, Redis HTTP, internal admin panels, the agent\u0027s own HTTP server).\n- Have responses returned to the LLM, which combined with prompt injection enables exfiltration back to the attacker.\n\n## Patch\n\nCommit on `dev`: 21f63e6.\n\nNew helper `packages/http/src/_security.ts` exposes `isSecureUrl`, `isLoopbackUrl`, `ensureSecureUrl`. Hostname-based validation closes the prefix bypass (`http://localhost.evil.com` \u2192 rejected). All three protocols\u0027 `registerManual` now call `ensureSecureUrl(url, \u0027manual discovery\u0027)`; `callTool` re-checks the resolved URL with `ensureSecureUrl(url, \u0027tool invocation\u0027)` immediately before the axios request. `OpenApiConverter` rejects remote spec \u2192 loopback server.\n\n## Workarounds\n\nFor users who cannot upgrade immediately:\n- Refuse to call `registerManual` with any URL controlled by an untrusted party, even over HTTPS.\n- Restrict outbound network access from the host running the agent so internal addresses (RFC1918, 169.254.0.0/16, loopback) are unreachable.\n\n## Credit\n\nDiscovered and reported by [@YLChen-007](https://github.com/YLChen-007) against the Python sibling implementation (universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp#83). The TypeScript port shared the same code shape and the same vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-r8j5-8747-88cm",
  "modified": "2026-06-09T10:26:31Z",
  "published": "2026-05-14T20:55:05Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/universal-tool-calling-protocol/typescript-utcp/security/advisories/GHSA-r8j5-8747-88cm"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45366"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/universal-tool-calling-protocol/python-utcp/issues/83"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/universal-tool-calling-protocol/typescript-utcp"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "@utcp/http: SSRF via attacker-controlled OpenAPI servers[0].url in HTTP communication protocol"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…