GHSA-MJCM-HF7X-HM3W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-27 15:33 – Updated: 2026-09-16 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure

If skb_unshare() fails to unshare a packet due to allocation failure in rxrpc_input_packet(), the skb pointer in the parent (rxrpc_io_thread()) will be NULL'd out. This will likely cause the call to trace_rxrpc_rx_done() to oops.

Fix this by moving the unsharing down to where rxrpc_input_call_event() calls rxrpc_input_call_packet(). There are a number of places prior to that where we ignore DATA packets for a variety of reasons (such as the call already being complete) for which an unshare is then avoided.

And with that, rxrpc_input_packet() doesn't need to take a pointer to the pointer to the packet, so change that to just a pointer.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45998"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416",
      "CWE-825"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-27T14:17:17Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc: Fix potential UAF after skb_unshare() failure\n\nIf skb_unshare() fails to unshare a packet due to allocation failure in\nrxrpc_input_packet(), the skb pointer in the parent (rxrpc_io_thread())\nwill be NULL\u0027d out.  This will likely cause the call to\ntrace_rxrpc_rx_done() to oops.\n\nFix this by moving the unsharing down to where rxrpc_input_call_event()\ncalls rxrpc_input_call_packet().  There are a number of places prior to\nthat where we ignore DATA packets for a variety of reasons (such as the\ncall already being complete) for which an unshare is then avoided.\n\nAnd with that, rxrpc_input_packet() doesn\u0027t need to take a pointer to the\npointer to the packet, so change that to just a pointer.",
  "id": "GHSA-mjcm-hf7x-hm3w",
  "modified": "2026-09-16T15:30:36Z",
  "published": "2026-05-27T15:33:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45998"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34911"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:55445"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:65708"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:65712"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67721"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67723"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45998"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2482024"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f2740150f904bfa60e4bad74d65add3ccb5e7f8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8fde6296c4d4da2be7ab761305ab7f232b94eefd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/996b0487b3cdda4c91811dbb1c9564626bc840bd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf20f46d94f1db38e6ffc0ca204a5fe0de01b495"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3bf143b1e98fb3d6d9e6825bcd683974d478e8c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-45998.json"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…