GHSA-GQX7-6552-67HF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-15 18:30 – Updated: 2026-06-08 23:31
VLAI
Summary
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in com.oviva.telematik:epa4all-client
Details

Impact

An attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects u ri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker's encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker's auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material.

Patches

#36

Workarounds

None.

Resources

  • MS-OVIVA-EPA4ALL-d453c1

Credits

Machine Spirits (contact@machinespirits.de)

  • Dr. rer. nat. Simon Weber
  • Dipl.-Inf. Volker Schönefeld
  • Chiara Fliegner
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "com.oviva.telematik:epa4all-client"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.2.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-45575"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-15T18:30:48Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-26T21:16:40Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\nAn attacker who can MITM the TLS connection between the client and the IDP (within the TI network) can substitute a forged discovery document. The forged document redirects u ri_puk_idp_enc and uri_puk_idp_sig to attacker-controlled URLs. The client then encrypts the SMC-B-signed challenge response to the attacker\u0027s encryption key and POSTs it to the attacker\u0027s auth endpoint. This captures the signed authentication material.\n\n### Patches\n[#36](https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36)\n\n### Workarounds\nNone.\n\n### Resources\n- MS-OVIVA-EPA4ALL-d453c1\n\n### Credits\n[Machine Spirits](https://machinespirits.com/) ([contact@machinespirits.de](mailto:contact@machinespirits.de))\n\n- Dr. rer. nat. Simon Weber\n- Dipl.-Inf. Volker Sch\u00f6nefeld\n- Chiara Fliegner",
  "id": "GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf",
  "modified": "2026-06-08T23:31:26Z",
  "published": "2026-05-15T18:30:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/security/advisories/GHSA-gqx7-6552-67hf"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45575"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/pull/36"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/commit/9111d6fbb939007036a7f74b2a93bb278cb5af32"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/oviva-ag/epa4all-client/releases/tag/v1.2.2"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in com.oviva.telematik:epa4all-client"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…