GHSA-6QC4-57V3-28RR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-24 15:31 – Updated: 2026-09-25 19:13
VLAI
Summary
Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin has a CSRF vulnerability
Details

Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier does not perform a permission check in an HTTP endpoint that tests the connection to a Contrast TeamServer.

This allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using an attacker-specified username, API key, and service key.

Additionally, this HTTP endpoint does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.

Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.12 requires Overall/Administer permission and POST requests to test the connection to a Contrast TeamServer.

Severity
5.4 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.jenkins-ci.plugins:contrast-continuous-application-security"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.12"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-57298"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-352"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-25T19:13:04Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-24T14:17:35Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.11 and earlier does not perform a permission check in an HTTP endpoint that tests the connection to a Contrast TeamServer.\n\nThis allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to connect to an attacker-specified URL using an attacker-specified username, API key, and service key.\n\nAdditionally, this HTTP endpoint does not require POST requests, resulting in a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.\n\nContrast Continuous Application Security Plugin 3.12 requires Overall/Administer permission and POST requests to test the connection to a Contrast TeamServer.",
  "id": "GHSA-6qc4-57v3-28rr",
  "modified": "2026-09-25T19:13:04Z",
  "published": "2026-06-24T15:31:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-57298"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/contrast-continuous-application-security-plugin/commit/ddea0a815aec52c0695d8c0c7f09f9cfce4989e5"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/contrast-continuous-application-security-plugin"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/jenkinsci/contrast-continuous-application-security-plugin/releases/tag/contrast-continuous-application-security-3.12"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2026-06-24/#SECURITY-3697%20(1)"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Jenkins Contrast Continuous Application Security Plugin has a CSRF vulnerability"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.