GHSA-4XX7-2CX3-X473
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-19 18:30 – Updated: 2024-12-20 17:48Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-xgfv-xpx8-qhcr. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
A flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based on the position of the signature in the XML document, rather than the Reference element used to specify the signed element. This flaw allows attackers to create crafted responses that can bypass the validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation or impersonation attacks.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.keycloak:keycloak-saml-core"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "25.0.6"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-19T19:48:27Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-09-19T16:15:06Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "# Duplicate Advisory\nThis advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-xgfv-xpx8-qhcr. This link is maintained to preserve external references.\n\n# Original Description\n\nA flaw exists in the SAML signature validation method within the Keycloak XMLSignatureUtil class. The method incorrectly determines whether a SAML signature is for the full document or only for specific assertions based on the position of the signature in the XML document, rather than the Reference element used to specify the signed element. This flaw allows attackers to create crafted responses that can bypass the validation, potentially leading to privilege escalation or impersonation attacks.",
"id": "GHSA-4xx7-2cx3-x473",
"modified": "2024-12-20T17:48:24Z",
"published": "2024-09-19T18:30:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-8698"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/releases/tag/25.0.6"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2311641"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-8698"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8826"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8824"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:8823"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6890"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6889"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6888"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6887"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6886"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6882"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6880"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6879"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6878"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Duplicate Advisory: Keycloak SAML signature validation flaw",
"withdrawn": "2024-12-20T17:48:24Z"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.