FKIE_CVE-2026-28385

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-06-26 17:16 - Updated: 2026-07-06 18:14
Severity
5.0 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Summary
In Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.9, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the image import functionality allows authenticated users with the can_create_images entitlement to interact with internal network infrastructure via the /images endpoint. When importing an image from a URL source, the LXD daemon fails to validate or restrict outbound destination IP addresses, allowing connections to loopback, RFC1918 private ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints. This enables error-based port scanning and unauthorized interaction with internal HTTP services from the daemon's network position.
References
security@ubuntu.comhttps://github.com/canonical/lxd/pull/18462Issue Tracking, Patch
security@ubuntu.comhttps://github.com/canonical/lxd/security/advisories/GHSA-3gq2-x4qg-p4g6Exploit, Vendor Advisory, Mitigation
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
canonical lxd *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://github.com/canonical",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "lxd",
          "platforms": [
            "Linux"
          ],
          "product": "lxd",
          "programFiles": [
            "permissions.go"
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/canonical/lxd",
          "vendor": "Canonical",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "6.10",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "6.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@ubuntu.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:canonical:lxd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "96A991F9-74FE-4B09-B5F9-C503F94E1D75",
              "versionEndIncluding": "6.9",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.12",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "In Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.9, a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the image import functionality allows authenticated users with the can_create_images entitlement to interact with internal network infrastructure via the /images endpoint. When importing an image from a URL source, the LXD daemon fails to validate or restrict outbound destination IP addresses, allowing connections to loopback, RFC1918 private ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints. This enables error-based port scanning and unauthorized interaction with internal HTTP services from the daemon\u0027s network position."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-28385",
  "lastModified": "2026-07-06T18:14:53.080",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.0,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@ubuntu.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-28385",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-06-26T17:13:30.913771Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-06-26T17:16:32.430",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@ubuntu.com",
      "tags": [
        "Issue Tracking",
        "Patch"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/canonical/lxd/pull/18462"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@ubuntu.com",
      "tags": [
        "Exploit",
        "Vendor Advisory",
        "Mitigation"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/canonical/lxd/security/advisories/GHSA-3gq2-x4qg-p4g6"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@ubuntu.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-918"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@ubuntu.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.