CVE-2026-96400 (GCVE-0-2026-96400)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-10-06 19:25 – Updated: 2026-10-07 11:35
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS
Summary
With `[migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS` set to a matching entry such as `*` or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as `169.254.169.254`, even when `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false`. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty `ALLOWED_DOMAINS` configuration is not affected.
Severity
4.3 (Medium)
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-10-07 11:35 UTC
CWE
- CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/adviso… | vendor-advisory |
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39426 | patch |
| https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.0.0/ | release-notes |
| https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.0.0 | release-notes |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-96400",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T11:35:23.694637Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:35:27.280Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "gitea.dev",
"product": "Gitea",
"vendor": "Gitea",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.27.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "https://github.com/ihopenre-eng"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/TheFox0x7"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/silverwind"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/bircni"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/wxiaoguang"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "With `[migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS` set to a matching entry such as `*` or a hostname wildcard, Gitea\u0027s migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as `169.254.169.254`, even when `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false`. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty `ALLOWED_DOMAINS` configuration is not affected."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T19:25:23.261Z",
"orgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"shortName": "Gitea"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-54w9-6cc5-9wj9",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-54w9-6cc5-9wj9"
},
{
"name": "Fix: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39426",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39426"
},
{
"name": "Gitea 28.0.0 release announcement",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.0.0/"
},
{
"name": "go-gitea/gitea v28.0.0 release",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.0.0"
}
],
"title": "Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"assignerShortName": "Gitea",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-96400",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T19:25:23.261Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-04T21:59:53.556Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:35:27.280Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-96400",
"date": "2026-10-07",
"epss": "0.00148",
"percentile": "0.03492"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "gitea.dev",
"product": "Gitea",
"vendor": "Gitea",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.27.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "With `[migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS` set to a matching entry such as `*` or a hostname wildcard, Gitea\u0027s migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as `169.254.169.254`, even when `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false`. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty `ALLOWED_DOMAINS` configuration is not affected."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-96400",
"lastModified": "2026-10-07T13:45:36.947",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-96400",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T11:35:23.694637Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-10-06T20:17:35.387",
"references": [
{
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.0.0/"
},
{
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39426"
},
{
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.0.0"
},
{
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-54w9-6cc5-9wj9"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
},
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-96400",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-10-07T11:35:23.694637Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:35:18.304Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageName": "gitea.dev",
"product": "Gitea",
"vendor": "Gitea",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.27.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "https://github.com/ihopenre-eng"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/TheFox0x7"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/silverwind"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/bircni"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "https://github.com/wxiaoguang"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "With `[migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS` set to a matching entry such as `*` or a hostname wildcard, Gitea\u0027s migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as `169.254.169.254`, even when `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false`. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty `ALLOWED_DOMAINS` configuration is not affected."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-918",
"description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-06T19:25:23.261Z",
"orgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"shortName": "Gitea"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-54w9-6cc5-9wj9",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-54w9-6cc5-9wj9"
},
{
"name": "Fix: go-gitea/gitea pull request #39426",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/39426"
},
{
"name": "Gitea 28.0.0 release announcement",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-28.0.0/"
},
{
"name": "go-gitea/gitea v28.0.0 release",
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v28.0.0"
}
],
"title": "Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "88ee5874-cf24-4952-aea0-31affedb7ff2",
"assignerShortName": "Gitea",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-96400",
"datePublished": "2026-10-06T19:25:23.261Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-10-04T21:59:53.556Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-10-07T11:35:27.280Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…