CNVD-2015-00067

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2015-01-06
VLAI
Title
Kandidat CMS存在多个跨站请求伪造漏洞
Description
Kandidat CMS 1.4.2 版本存在多个跨站请求伪造漏洞,允许远程攻击者利用漏洞劫持管理员的请求认证。
Severity
中
Formal description

目前没有详细的解决方案提供: http://cwe.mitre.org

Reference
https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-5319 https://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB22648
Impacted products
Name
Kandidat CMS Kandidat CMS 1.4.2
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2010-5319"
    }
  },
  "description": "Kandidat CMS 1.4.2 \u7248\u672c\u5b58\u5728\u591a\u4e2a\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u5141\u8bb8\u8fdc\u7a0b\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\u52ab\u6301\u7ba1\u7406\u5458\u7684\u8bf7\u6c42\u8ba4\u8bc1\u3002",
  "discovererName": "High-Tech Bridge Security Research Lab",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u89e3\u51b3\u65b9\u6848\u63d0\u4f9b\uff1a\r\nhttp://cwe.mitre.org",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2015-00067",
  "openTime": "2015-01-06",
  "products": {
    "product": "Kandidat CMS Kandidat CMS 1.4.2"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-5319\r\nhttps://www.htbridge.com/advisory/HTB22648",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2015-01-05",
  "title": "Kandidat CMS\u5b58\u5728\u591a\u4e2a\u8de8\u7ad9\u8bf7\u6c42\u4f2a\u9020\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…