AVID-2023-V011

Vulnerability from avid – Published: 2023-03-31 – Updated: 2023-03-31 ATLAS Case Study
Summary
The Azure Red Team performed a red team exercise on a new Microsoft product designed for running AI workloads at the edge. This exercise was meant to use a automated system to continuously manipulate a target image to cause the ML model to produce misclassifications.
Risk domain
Security
SEP view
S0301: Information Leak, S0403: Adversarial Example
Lifecycle
L06: Deployment
Organisations
Affected artifacts
Artifact Type
New Microsoft AI Product System
References
URL Label
https://atlas.mitre.org/studies/AML.CS0011 Microsoft Edge AI Evasion

{
  "affects": {
    "artifacts": [
      {
        "name": "New Microsoft AI Product",
        "type": "System"
      }
    ],
    "deployer": [
      "New Microsoft AI Product"
    ],
    "developer": []
  },
  "credit": null,
  "data_type": "AVID",
  "data_version": "0.2",
  "description": {
    "lang": "eng",
    "value": "The Azure Red Team performed a red team exercise on a new Microsoft product designed for running AI workloads at the edge. This exercise was meant to use a automated system to continuously manipulate a target image to cause the ML model to produce misclassifications.\n"
  },
  "impact": {
    "avid": {
      "lifecycle_view": [
        "L06: Deployment"
      ],
      "risk_domain": [
        "Security"
      ],
      "sep_view": [
        "S0301: Information Leak",
        "S0403: Adversarial Example"
      ],
      "taxonomy_version": "0.2"
    }
  },
  "last_modified_date": "2023-03-31",
  "metadata": {
    "vuln_id": "AVID-2023-V011"
  },
  "problemtype": {
    "classof": "ATLAS Case Study",
    "description": {
      "lang": "eng",
      "value": "Microsoft Edge AI Evasion"
    },
    "type": "Advisory"
  },
  "published_date": "2023-03-31",
  "references": [
    {
      "label": "Microsoft Edge AI Evasion",
      "type": "source",
      "url": "https://atlas.mitre.org/studies/AML.CS0011"
    }
  ],
  "reports": null
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…