GHSA-QF2F-QH6P-7V89

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-21 20:13 – Updated: 2026-07-21 20:13
VLAI
Summary
Gitea CVE-2026-20800 sibling endpoints not covered: revoked user still reads private repo objects via `/api/v1/user/starred` and private issue titles via `/api/v1/user/times`
Details

Summary

CVE-2026-20800 fixed private-info leakage to revoked users only for the notification endpoint. Two sibling endpoints that return data keyed on the caller's own relationship still do not re-check repo access at output time: - GET /api/v1/user/starred — getStarredRepos() computes a per-repo permission but still lists every starred repo (no filtering), so the full repo object (full_name, private, clone_url, ssh_url) of a now-inaccessible private repo is returned. - GET /api/v1/user/times — ListMyTrackedTimes() queries by UserID only and LoadAttributes brings in the issue (title, state), leaking private issue titles after revocation.

Steps to reproduce

Using the provided reproduction materials, as a revoked user: 1. Control: GET /api/v1/repos/admin/starred-test → 404. 2. GET /api/v1/user/starred → leaks admin/starred-test, private:true, clone_url. 3. GET /api/v1/user/times → leaks issue.title = "SECRET: …", state.

(Runtime-confirmed on gitea/gitea:1.25.4. Oracle = planted sentinel title; no real secret exfiltrated.)

Impact

A former collaborator can enumerate private repos they starred and read private issue titles they logged time on, indefinitely after access revocation. Metadata only (no repo content / comment bodies). Low.

Suggested remediation

  1. getStarredRepos: drop (or minimally redact) repos where permission.HasAnyUnitAccessOrPublicAccess() is false for the caller.
  2. ListMyTrackedTimes: filter tracked-time entries by current repo access.
  3. Optionally clear a user's stars / time entries for a private repo on revocation.

Credit

Reported as part of an incomplete-patch measurement study (responsible disclosure).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "code.gitea.io/gitea"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.27.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-59766"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-863"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-21T20:13:03Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\nCVE-2026-20800 fixed private-info leakage to revoked users only for the notification endpoint. Two\nsibling endpoints that return data keyed on the caller\u0027s own relationship still do not re-check repo\naccess at output time:\n- `GET /api/v1/user/starred` \u2014 `getStarredRepos()` computes a per-repo permission but still lists every\n  starred repo (no filtering), so the full repo object (`full_name`, `private`, `clone_url`, `ssh_url`)\n  of a now-inaccessible private repo is returned.\n- `GET /api/v1/user/times` \u2014 `ListMyTrackedTimes()` queries by `UserID` only and `LoadAttributes` brings\n  in the issue (`title`, `state`), leaking private issue titles after revocation.\n\n## Steps to reproduce\nUsing the provided reproduction materials, as a revoked user:\n1. Control: `GET /api/v1/repos/admin/starred-test` \u2192 **404**.\n2. `GET /api/v1/user/starred` \u2192 leaks `admin/starred-test`, `private:true`, `clone_url`.\n3. `GET /api/v1/user/times` \u2192 leaks `issue.title = \"SECRET: \u2026\"`, `state`.\n\n(Runtime-confirmed on `gitea/gitea:1.25.4`. Oracle = planted sentinel title; no real secret exfiltrated.)\n\n## Impact\nA former collaborator can enumerate private repos they starred and read private issue titles they logged\ntime on, indefinitely after access revocation. Metadata only (no repo content / comment bodies). Low.\n\n## Suggested remediation\n1. `getStarredRepos`: drop (or minimally redact) repos where `permission.HasAnyUnitAccessOrPublicAccess()`\n   is false for the caller.\n2. `ListMyTrackedTimes`: filter tracked-time entries by current repo access.\n3. Optionally clear a user\u0027s stars / time entries for a private repo on revocation.\n\n## Credit\nReported as part of an incomplete-patch measurement study (responsible disclosure).",
  "id": "GHSA-qf2f-qh6p-7v89",
  "modified": "2026-07-21T20:13:03Z",
  "published": "2026-07-21T20:13:03Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-qf2f-qh6p-7v89"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Gitea CVE-2026-20800 sibling endpoints not covered: revoked user still reads private repo objects via `/api/v1/user/starred` and private issue titles via `/api/v1/user/times`"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…