CVE-2025-31958 (GCVE-0-2025-31958)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-04-21 13:59 – Updated: 2026-04-21 19:32
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling
Summary
HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-04-21 19:32 UTC
CWE
- CWE-444 - Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response smuggling')
Assigner
References
1 reference
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCLSoftware | BigFix Service Management (SM) |
Affected:
23
|
Date Public
2026-04-20 13:55
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-31958",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-21T19:32:02.512507Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T19:32:20.831Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "BigFix Service Management (SM)",
"vendor": "HCLSoftware",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "23"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-20T13:55:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling.\u0026nbsp; HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking."
}
],
"value": "HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling.\u00a0 HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-444",
"description": "CWE-444 Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (\u0027HTTP Request/Response smuggling\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T13:59:14.787Z",
"orgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"shortName": "HCL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0124209"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"assignerShortName": "HCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-31958",
"datePublished": "2026-04-21T13:59:14.787Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-01T18:46:19.517Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T19:32:20.831Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2025-31958",
"date": "2026-10-08",
"epss": "0.00177",
"percentile": "0.06695"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "BigFix Service Management (SM)",
"vendor": "HCLSoftware",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "23"
}
]
}
],
"source": "psirt@hcl.com"
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:hcltech:bigfix_service_management:23.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4D915AC1-7C2B-497D-9A77-9726954B2282",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling.\u00a0 HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "HCL BigFix Service Management es susceptible al Contrabando de Solicitudes HTTP. Las vulnerabilidades de contrabando de solicitudes HTTP surgen cuando los sitios web enrutan solicitudes HTTP a trav\u00e9s de servidores web con an\u00e1lisis HTTP inconsistente. El Contrabando HTTP explota inconsistencias en el an\u00e1lisis de solicitudes entre servidores front-end y back-end, permitiendo a los atacantes eludir los controles de seguridad y realizar ataques como el envenenamiento de cach\u00e9 o el secuestro de solicitudes."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-31958",
"lastModified": "2026-10-07T09:10:00.160",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "psirt@hcl.com",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.2,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 4.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2025-31958",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "none"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-21T19:32:02.512507Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-04-21T15:16:35.440",
"references": [
{
"source": "psirt@hcl.com",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0124209"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "psirt@hcl.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-444"
}
],
"source": "psirt@hcl.com",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2025-31958",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-04-21T19:32:02.512507Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T19:32:09.931Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "BigFix Service Management (SM)",
"vendor": "HCLSoftware",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "23"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-20T13:55:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling.\u0026nbsp; HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking."
}
],
"value": "HCL BigFix Service Management is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling.\u00a0 HTTP request smuggling vulnerabilities arise when websites route HTTP requests through web servers with inconsistent HTTP parsing. HTTP Smuggling exploits inconsistencies in request parsing between front-end and back-end servers, allowing attackers to bypass security controls and perform attacks like cache poisoning or request hijacking."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 3.7,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-444",
"description": "CWE-444 Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (\u0027HTTP Request/Response smuggling\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T13:59:14.787Z",
"orgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"shortName": "HCL"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article\u0026sysparm_article=KB0124209"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is susceptible to HTTP Request Smuggling",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "1e47fe04-f25f-42fa-b674-36de2c5e3cfc",
"assignerShortName": "HCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-31958",
"datePublished": "2026-04-21T13:59:14.787Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-01T18:46:19.517Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-04-21T19:32:20.831Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…