CWE-916
AllowedUse of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
Abstraction: Base · Status: Incomplete
The product generates a hash for a password, but it uses a scheme that does not provide a sufficient level of computational effort that would make password cracking attacks infeasible or expensive.
187 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.
CVE-2026-57310 (GCVE-0-2026-57310)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-20 12:52 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:40- CWE-916 - Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://cert.pl/posts/2026/07/CVE-2026-57309 | third-party-advisory |
| https://windu.org | product |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-57310",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-20T15:38:53.860183Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-20T15:40:24.711Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unknown",
"product": "Windu CMS",
"vendor": "JCD",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "4.1",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jakub Lipi\u0144ski"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Marek To\u0142czyk"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Kamil Kr\u00f3likowski"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Windu CMS uses hashing algorithm based on MD5 and SHA1 with static salt to store user passwords. This allows an attacker who obtain password hash to decode user credentials.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eBecause vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 4.1 but may also affect other versions.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Windu CMS uses hashing algorithm based on MD5 and SHA1 with static salt to store user passwords. This allows an attacker who obtain password hash to decode user credentials.\n\nBecause vendor contact attempts were unsuccessful, the vulnerability has only been confirmed in version 4.1 but may also affect other versions."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-20T12:52:56.365Z",
"orgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"shortName": "CERT-PL"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://cert.pl/posts/2026/07/CVE-2026-57309"
},
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://windu.org"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Weak password hashing in Windu CMS",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6",
"assignerShortName": "CERT-PL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-57310",
"datePublished": "2026-07-20T12:52:56.365Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-24T12:12:42.195Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-20T15:40:24.711Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-56272 (GCVE-0-2026-56272)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-24 11:53 – Updated: 2026-06-24 15:52- CWE-916 - Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/adv… | vendor-advisory |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowise-insu… | third-party-advisory |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-56272",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-24T15:52:34.998933Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T15:52:44.091Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"packageURL": "pkg:npm/flowise",
"product": "Flowise",
"vendor": "Flowise",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "3.0.13",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "3.0.13",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:flowiseai:flowise:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.0.13",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "kolega-ai-dev"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-05T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Flowise before 3.0.13 uses bcrypt with default salt rounds of 5, providing only 32 iterations instead of the OWASP-recommended minimum of 10 rounds. Attackers can crack password hashes approximately 30 times faster with modern GPU hardware, potentially compromising all user accounts in a database breach scenario."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE"
},
"format": "CVSS"
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.1,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS"
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T11:53:15.628Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-x2g5-fvc2-gqvp)",
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/security/advisories/GHSA-x2g5-fvc2-gqvp"
},
{
"name": "VulnCheck Advisory: Flowise - Insufficient Password Salt Rounds in Bcrypt Hashing",
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowise-insufficient-password-salt-rounds-in-bcrypt-hashing"
}
],
"title": "Flowise - Insufficient Password Salt Rounds in Bcrypt Hashing",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck-endgame"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-56272",
"datePublished": "2026-06-24T11:53:15.628Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-20T01:47:54.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-24T15:52:44.091Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-55069 (GCVE-0-2026-55069)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-26 20:50 – Updated: 2026-06-29 13:16- CWE-916 - Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/kestra-io/kestra/security/advi… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-55069",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-29T13:16:35.099360Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-29T13:16:39.618Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kestra-io/kestra/security/advisories/GHSA-m727-pcjm-j28h"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "kestra",
"vendor": "kestra-io",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.3.24"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 1.3.24, this vulnerability exists in the BasicAuth authentication component of the Kestra OSS workflow orchestration platform. An attacker who gains read access to the PostgreSQL database can exploit SHA-512\u0027s high computation speed to recover the administrator password offline. In Kubernetes deployments, a successful crack further enables reading of the cluster ServiceAccount Token and all K8s Secrets, achieving vertical privilege escalation. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.3.24."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.7,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-26T20:50:09.954Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/kestra-io/kestra/security/advisories/GHSA-m727-pcjm-j28h",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/kestra-io/kestra/security/advisories/GHSA-m727-pcjm-j28h"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-m727-pcjm-j28h",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Kestra BasicAuth Password Stored as SHA-512 Enables Offline Brute-Force Attack"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-55069",
"datePublished": "2026-06-26T20:50:09.954Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-16T14:33:35.710Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-29T13:16:39.618Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-53762 (GCVE-0-2026-53762)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-21 18:50 – Updated: 2026-08-26 17:35- CWE-916 - Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/security/a… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/commit/39f… | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/releases/t… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-53762",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-26T17:35:29.165865Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T17:35:53.948Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-94c6-mgmv-mqc5"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "VeraCrypt",
"vendor": "veracrypt",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 1.26.29"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "VeraCrypt provides disk encryption with strong security based on TrueCrypt. Prior to 1.26.29, non-default builds created with WOLFCRYPT=1 and WOLFCRYPT_BACKEND route SHA-256 and SHA-512 volume-header key derivation through derive_key_sha256 and derive_key_sha512 in src/Crypto/wolfCrypt.c, where the configured iterations value is discarded and wc_HKDF is used instead of PBKDF2-HMAC. Changing the PIM or iteration count therefore does not increase derivation cost, allowing an attacker with an affected container, disk image, or volume header to perform substantially cheaper offline password guesses. Official precompiled VeraCrypt binaries and normal distribution packages use the standard PBKDF2 backend and are not affected. Volumes created by an affected WOLFCRYPT=1 build require backup and recreation because corrected builds derive different keys. This issue is fixed in version 1.26.29."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 6.2,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-21T18:50:58.083Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-94c6-mgmv-mqc5",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-94c6-mgmv-mqc5"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/commit/39f93910075e1cf492fcf4a9f99a53c7d0b96b87",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/commit/39f93910075e1cf492fcf4a9f99a53c7d0b96b87"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/releases/tag/VeraCrypt_1.26.29",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/veracrypt/VeraCrypt/releases/tag/VeraCrypt_1.26.29"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-94c6-mgmv-mqc5",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "VeraCryp: wolfCrypt backend bypasses VeraCrypt PBKDF2 iteration count (non-default WOLFCRYPT=1 builds)"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-53762",
"datePublished": "2026-08-21T18:50:58.083Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-06-10T17:48:40.546Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-26T17:35:53.948Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-49005 (GCVE-0-2026-49005)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-07 03:36 – Updated: 2026-08-07 15:31- CWE-916 - Use of password hash with insufficient computational effort
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-49005",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-07T15:31:17.640454Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-07T15:31:40.271Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "F689",
"vendor": "ZTE",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "ZXHN F680V9.0.10P6N1,ZXHN F680V9.0.10P4N4,ZXHN F680V9.0.10P4N5,ZXHN F680V9.0.10P4N9,ZXHN F680V9.0.10P4N10,ZXHN F680V9.0.10P1N12,ZXHN F680V9.0.10P1N13"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Victor Mota"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The root password hash of the device can be obtained through unencrypted information in the firmware."
}
],
"value": "The root password hash of the device can be obtained through unencrypted information in the firmware."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-55",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-55 Rainbow Table Password Cracking"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "PHYSICAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 2.4,
"baseSeverity": "LOW",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916 Use of password hash with insufficient computational effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-07T03:36:08.185Z",
"orgId": "6786b568-6808-4982-b61f-398b0d9679eb",
"shortName": "zte"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://support.zte.com.cn/zte-iccp-isupport-webui/bulletin/detail/7458768768701636680"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Root password hash exposure vulnerability in ZTE F689 product",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.4"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6786b568-6808-4982-b61f-398b0d9679eb",
"assignerShortName": "zte",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-49005",
"datePublished": "2026-08-07T03:36:08.185Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-27T01:01:53.327Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-07T15:31:40.271Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-45787 (GCVE-0-2026-45787)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-28 17:17 – Updated: 2026-05-29 15:29| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/adv… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| https://github.com/electerm/electerm/commit/9dd82… | x_refsource_MISC |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-45787",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-29T15:29:07.655890Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T15:29:15.127Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "electerm",
"vendor": "electerm",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.9.5"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "electerm is an open-sourced terminal/ssh/sftp/telnet/serialport/RDP/VNC/Spice/ftp client. Prior to 3.9.5, deterministic AES-192-CBC with a fixed zero IV, constant KDF salt, and no MAC leads to confidentiality and integrity failures for synced bookmark/profile data. Attackers can crack common passwords across installs and perform undetected ciphertext bit-flips to alter config/bookmarks. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.9.5."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-326",
"description": "CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-329",
"description": "CWE-329: Generation of Predictable IV with CBC Mode",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-353",
"description": "CWE-353: Missing Support for Integrity Check",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-759",
"description": "CWE-759: Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-28T17:17:56.385Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/advisories/GHSA-g29v-q6h7-76wh",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/advisories/GHSA-g29v-q6h7-76wh"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/electerm/electerm/commit/9dd8295e37d53396b980cd45dfc5ed11ad79b937",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/electerm/electerm/commit/9dd8295e37d53396b980cd45dfc5ed11ad79b937"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-g29v-q6h7-76wh",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "electerm\u0027s encrypt method not safe enough"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-45787",
"datePublished": "2026-05-28T17:17:56.385Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-13T08:19:32.602Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T15:29:15.127Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-45027 (GCVE-0-2026-45027)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-27 15:24 – Updated: 2026-05-27 17:52| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/LabRedesCefetRJ/WeGIA/security… | x_refsource_CONFIRM |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LabRedesCefetRJ | WeGIA |
Affected:
< 3.7.3
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-45027",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-27T17:51:37.251231Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T17:52:00.845Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/LabRedesCefetRJ/WeGIA/security/advisories/GHSA-hcgv-vmq6-j6qg"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "WeGIA",
"vendor": "LabRedesCefetRJ",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "\u003c 3.7.3"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "WeGIA is a web manager for charitable institutions. In versions prior to 3.7.3, when a user logs in, html/login.php hashes the submitted password using PHP\u0027s hash() function with the SHA-256 algorithm and no salt before comparing it to the stored value. The password change flow in controle/FuncionarioControle.php follows the same pattern. SHA-256 is a general-purpose cryptographic hash built for speed, not password storage. Without a salt, identical passwords produce identical digests, making the entire hash database vulnerable to a single precomputed rainbow table lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.3."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
}
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-759",
"description": "CWE-759: Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T15:24:21.616Z",
"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"shortName": "GitHub_M"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "https://github.com/LabRedesCefetRJ/WeGIA/security/advisories/GHSA-hcgv-vmq6-j6qg",
"tags": [
"x_refsource_CONFIRM"
],
"url": "https://github.com/LabRedesCefetRJ/WeGIA/security/advisories/GHSA-hcgv-vmq6-j6qg"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "GHSA-hcgv-vmq6-j6qg",
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "WeGIA: Use of Weak Password Hashing Algorithm (SHA-256, no salt) in html/login.php"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
"assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-45027",
"datePublished": "2026-05-27T15:24:21.616Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-08T16:58:28.896Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-27T17:52:00.845Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-44611 (GCVE-0-2026-44611)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-05-29 17:42 – Updated: 2026-05-29 19:44- CWE-916 - Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danelec | MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) G4e |
Affected:
0 , < 5.250
(custom)
|
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-44611",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-05-29T19:44:32.498800Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T19:44:47.782Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"product": "MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) G4e",
"vendor": "Danelec",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "5.250",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Andrew Tierney of Pen Test Partners reported these vulnerabilities to CISA."
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-05-28T17:22:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan\u003eDanelec MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder\u003c/span\u003e\n\u003cspan\u003epasswords are stored with a hashing method which limits password length and is susceptible to brute force attacks.\u003c/span\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Danelec MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder\npasswords are stored with a hashing method which limits password length and is susceptible to brute force attacks."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.4,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "HIGH",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "ADJACENT",
"baseScore": 5.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T17:42:15.577Z",
"orgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"shortName": "icscert"
},
"references": [
{
"url": "https://www.danelec.com/contact"
},
{
"url": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-advisories/icsa-26-148-01"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/cisagov/CSAF/blob/develop/csaf_files/OT/white/2026/icsa-26-148-01.json"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cspan\u003eDanelec has released firmware version V5.250 to resolve these vulnerabilities. Users of MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) G4e devices are encouraged to update the firmware at the earliest service attendance rather than waiting for an annual performance test. Contact Danelec with additional questions:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/span\u003e\u003ca href=\"https://www.danelec.com/contact\"\u003ehttps://www.danelec.com/contact\u003c/a\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Danelec has released firmware version V5.250 to resolve these vulnerabilities. Users of MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) G4e devices are encouraged to update the firmware at the earliest service attendance rather than waiting for an annual performance test. Contact Danelec with additional questions:\u00a0 https://www.danelec.com/contact"
}
],
"source": {
"advisory": "ICSA-26-148-01",
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) G4e Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 1.0.2"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "7d14cffa-0d7d-4270-9dc0-52cabd5a23a6",
"assignerShortName": "icscert",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-44611",
"datePublished": "2026-05-29T17:42:15.577Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-05-07T16:55:26.109Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-05-29T19:44:47.782Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-40522 (GCVE-0-2026-40522)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-06-29 12:29 – Updated: 2026-07-14 20:00 X_Open Source| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://jivasecurity.com/writeups/frontaccounting… | technical-descriptionexploit |
| https://sourceforge.net/p/frontaccounting/news/20… | release-notes |
| https://github.com/FrontAccountingERP/FA/commit/8… | patch |
| https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/frontaccount… | third-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FrontAccounting | FrontAccounting |
Affected:
0 , < 2.4.20
(semver)
Unaffected: 894adaf71393e0ef6a04fe6036fcd2464050f590 (git) cpe:2.3:a:frontaccounting:frontaccounting:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-40522",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-06-29T13:42:25.365265Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-29T13:42:36.862Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"product": "FrontAccounting",
"vendor": "FrontAccounting",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.4.20",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "semver"
},
{
"status": "unaffected",
"version": "894adaf71393e0ef6a04fe6036fcd2464050f590",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:frontaccounting:frontaccounting:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "2.4.20",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Jiva (JivaSecurity)"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-04-23T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "FrontAccounting before 2.4.20 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the Bank Statement report handler that allows authenticated attackers to extract arbitrary database data by injecting UNION SELECT payloads into the PARAM_0 POST parameter. Attackers can supply malicious SQL syntax through the unparameterized WHERE clause to retrieve sensitive information including usernames, password hashes, and email addresses from the users table, rendered into PDF report output."
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
},
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-89",
"description": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-14T20:00:34.966Z",
"orgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"shortName": "VulnCheck"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://jivasecurity.com/writeups/frontaccounting-sqli-bank-statement-report-cve-2026-40522"
},
{
"tags": [
"release-notes"
],
"url": "https://sourceforge.net/p/frontaccounting/news/2026/04/release-2420/"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/FrontAccountingERP/FA/commit/894adaf71393e0ef6a04fe6036fcd2464050f590"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/frontaccounting-sql-injection-via-rep601-php"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"tags": [
"x_open-source"
],
"title": "FrontAccounting \u003c 2.4.20 SQL Injection via rep601.php",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "vulncheck"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "83251b91-4cc7-4094-a5c7-464a1b83ea10",
"assignerShortName": "VulnCheck",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-40522",
"datePublished": "2026-06-29T12:29:40.825Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-04-13T20:29:02.810Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-14T20:00:34.966Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
CVE-2026-30789 (GCVE-0-2026-30789)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-03-05 15:41 – Updated: 2026-06-22 13:16- CWE-916 - Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://rustdesk.com/docs/en/client/ | technical-descriptionx_--config documentation |
| https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSds6… | third-party-advisoryexploit |
| https://www.vulsec.org/ | vdb-entrythird-party-advisory |
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rustdesk-client | RustDesk Client |
Affected:
0 , ≤ 1.4.8
(custom)
cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:windows:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:macos:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:linux:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:ios:*:*:*:*:* cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:android:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-30789",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-03-17T14:32:41.844771Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-03-17T14:32:45.784Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/releases",
"defaultStatus": "affected",
"modules": [
"Client login",
"peer authentication"
],
"packageName": "rustdesk-client",
"platforms": [
"Windows",
"MacOS",
"Linux",
"iOS",
"Android"
],
"product": "RustDesk Client",
"programFiles": [
"src/client.rs"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "handle_hash()"
},
{
"name": "handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction)"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk,https://github.com/rustdesk/hbb_common",
"vendor": "rustdesk-client",
"versions": [
{
"lessThanOrEqual": "1.4.8",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Default \u2014 any password-based authentication"
}
],
"value": "Default \u2014 any password-based authentication"
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:windows:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.4.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:macos:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.4.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.4.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:ios:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.4.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:android:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.4.8",
"versionStartIncluding": "0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Erez Kalman"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Erez Kalman"
}
],
"datePublic": "2026-03-05T13:45:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Password Brute Forcing.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe authentication proof is SHA256(SHA256(password + salt) + challenge), where both the salt and the challenge are generated entirely by the server with no client-side nonce, and the hash uses no slow key-derivation function. A rogue or on-path API/relay server (see CVE-2026-30794 / CVE-2026-30797) can issue a chosen salt and challenge, capture the resulting proof, and recover the password offline. The capture-replay claim (CWE-294) is withdrawn: the challenge is regenerated per connection (challenge = Config::get_auto_password(6)), so a captured proof is not replayable against the legitimate server. The 1.4.7 OTP brute-force limiter and the existing LOGIN_FAILURES counter constrain only ONLINE attempts and do not address offline recovery.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.rs and program routines handle_hash(), handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction).\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8."
}
],
"value": "Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Password Brute Forcing.\n\nThe authentication proof is SHA256(SHA256(password + salt) + challenge), where both the salt and the challenge are generated entirely by the server with no client-side nonce, and the hash uses no slow key-derivation function. A rogue or on-path API/relay server (see CVE-2026-30794 / CVE-2026-30797) can issue a chosen salt and challenge, capture the resulting proof, and recover the password offline. The capture-replay claim (CWE-294) is withdrawn: the challenge is regenerated per connection (challenge = Config::get_auto_password(6)), so a captured proof is not replayable against the legitimate server. The 1.4.7 OTP brute-force limiter and the existing LOGIN_FAILURES counter constrain only ONLINE attempts and do not address offline recovery.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.rs and program routines handle_hash(), handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction).\n\nThis issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8."
}
],
"exploits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "PoC available.\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "PoC available."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-49",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 5.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-916",
"description": "CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T13:16:30.794Z",
"orgId": "2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe",
"shortName": "VULSec"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"technical-description",
"x_--config documentation"
],
"url": "https://rustdesk.com/docs/en/client/"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory",
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSds6jjpd38oO_yIAyd1HYtKNUuea-I-ozAPpGhYI7QgAU-QGJ7D8a4rOZVj1vmiUXV1EcdRHf9aZAW/pub"
},
{
"tags": [
"vdb-entry",
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://www.vulsec.org/"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Add a client-side nonce to the auth proof and use a slow KDF (e.g., Argon2id). Transition to SRP."
}
],
"value": "Add a client-side nonce to the auth proof and use a slow KDF (e.g., Argon2id). Transition to SRP."
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "RustDesk Auth Proof Uses Server-Controlled Salt/Challenge and Fast Double-SHA256, Enabling Offline Brute-Force",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "Use long (16+ char) random passwords. Enable 2FA where available."
}
],
"value": "Use long (16+ char) random passwords. Enable 2FA where available."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.5.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe",
"assignerShortName": "VULSec",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-30789",
"datePublished": "2026-03-05T15:41:51.417Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-03-05T14:13:37.202Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-06-22T13:16:30.794Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
Mitigation MIT-51
- Use an adaptive hash function that can be configured to change the amount of computational effort needed to compute the hash, such as the number of iterations ("stretching") or the amount of memory required. Some hash functions perform salting automatically. These functions can significantly increase the overhead for a brute force attack compared to intentionally-fast functions such as MD5. For example, rainbow table attacks can become infeasible due to the high computing overhead. Finally, since computing power gets faster and cheaper over time, the technique can be reconfigured to increase the workload without forcing an entire replacement of the algorithm in use.
- Some hash functions that have one or more of these desired properties include bcrypt [REF-291], scrypt [REF-292], and PBKDF2 [REF-293]. While there is active debate about which of these is the most effective, they are all stronger than using salts with hash functions with very little computing overhead.
- Note that using these functions can have an impact on performance, so they require special consideration to avoid denial-of-service attacks. However, their configurability provides finer control over how much CPU and memory is used, so it could be adjusted to suit the environment's needs.
Mitigation MIT-25
When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
CAPEC-55: Rainbow Table Password Cracking
An attacker gets access to the database table where hashes of passwords are stored. They then use a rainbow table of pre-computed hash chains to attempt to look up the original password. Once the original password corresponding to the hash is obtained, the attacker uses the original password to gain access to the system.