(CVE-2024-13239)
Vulnerability from drupal – Published: 2024-01-24 15:42 – Updated: 2025-02-20 18:39 – Source websiteThis module enables you to allow and/or require users to use a second authentication method in addition to password authentication.
In some cases, the module allows users to log in with an authentication plugin that an administrator has disabled.
This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an attacker must obtain a valid first-factor login credential, that an administrator must enable and then disable an authentication plugin, and that an attacker must obtain the valid second factor credential for the disabled plugin.
| URL | Type | |
|---|---|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"affected_versions": "\u003c1.5.0"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist:https://packages.drupal.org/8",
"name": "drupal/tfa"
},
"ranges": [
{
"database_specific": {
"constraint": "\u003c1.5.0"
},
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.5.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"severity": []
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-13239"
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://www.drupal.org/user/1879760"
],
"name": "Ide Braakman"
}
],
"details": "This module enables you to allow and/or require users to use a second authentication method in addition to password authentication.\n\nIn some cases, the module allows users to log in with an authentication plugin that an administrator has disabled.\n\nThis vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an attacker must obtain a valid first-factor login credential, that an administrator must enable and then disable an authentication plugin, and that an attacker must obtain the valid second factor credential for the disabled plugin.",
"id": "DRUPAL-CONTRIB-2024-003",
"modified": "2025-02-20T18:39:54.000Z",
"published": "2024-01-24T15:42:46.000Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2024-003"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.0"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.