<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 19:41:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-63073 — Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-63073</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenSSL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client
that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose
subject becomes the default expected sender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update()
converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline()
and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent
characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as &amp;#34;CN=%s%n&amp;#34; reaches
BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic
arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected
sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a
CMP client validating server responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic
arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated
stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of
service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint.
There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path
to remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS impact: no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol
imple…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenSSL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client
that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose
subject becomes the default expected sender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update()
converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline()
and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent
characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as &amp;#34;CN=%s%n&amp;#34; reaches
BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic
arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected
sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a
CMP client validating server responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic
arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated
stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of
service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint.
There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path
to remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS impact: no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol
imple…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-63073</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USN-8678-1 — openssl vulnerabilities</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-8678-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the QUIC server incoming
channel queue. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. This
issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-14456)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled signature algorithm
selection when using Raw Public Keys. A remote attacker could possibly use
this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service.
This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-14457)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC INITIAL packet
processing. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only
affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-18798)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled buffering of DTLS
records for a future epoch. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue
to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of
service. (CVE-2026-54874)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled CMS key unwrapping. A
remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a heap buffer
overflow, leading to a denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
(CVE-2026-63072)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly validated the sender
distinguished name in CMP response messages. A remote attacker could
possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of
service. Th…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the QUIC server incoming
channel queue. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. This
issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-14456)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled signature algorithm
selection when using Raw Public Keys. A remote attacker could possibly use
this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service.
This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-14457)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC INITIAL packet
processing. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause
OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only
affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-18798)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled buffering of DTLS
records for a future epoch. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue
to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of
service. (CVE-2026-54874)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled CMS key unwrapping. A
remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a heap buffer
overflow, leading to a denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
(CVE-2026-63072)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly validated the sender
distinguished name in CMP response messages. A remote attacker could
possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of
service. Th…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-8678-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
