<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 09:28:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-43472 — unshare: fix unshare_fs() handling</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-43472</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unshare: fix unshare_fs() handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s an unpleasant corner case in unshare(2), when we have a
CLONE_NEWNS in flags and current-&amp;gt;fs hadn&amp;#39;t been shared at all; in that
case copy_mnt_ns() gets passed current-&amp;gt;fs instead of a private copy,
which causes interesting warts in proof of correctness]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I guess if private means fs-&amp;gt;users == 1, the condition could still be true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, it&amp;#39;s worse than just a convoluted proof of correctness.
Consider the case when we have CLONE_NEWCGROUP in addition to CLONE_NEWNS
(and current-&amp;gt;fs-&amp;gt;users == 1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We pass current-&amp;gt;fs to copy_mnt_ns(), all right.  Suppose it succeeds and
flips current-&amp;gt;fs-&amp;gt;{pwd,root} to corresponding locations in the new namespace.
Now we proceed to copy_cgroup_ns(), which fails (e.g. with -ENOMEM).
We call put_mnt_ns() on the namespace created by copy_mnt_ns(), it&amp;#39;s
destroyed and its mount tree is dissolved, but...  current-&amp;gt;fs-&amp;gt;root and
current-&amp;gt;fs-&amp;gt;pwd are both left pointing to now detached mounts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They are pinning those, so it&amp;#39;s not a UAF, but it leaves the calling
process with unshare(2) failing with -ENOMEM _and_ leaving it with
pwd and root on detached isolated mounts.  The last part is clearly a bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is other fun related to that mess (races with pivot_root(), including
the one between pivot_root() and fork(), of all things), but this one
is easy to isolate and fix - treat CLONE_NEWNS as &amp;#34;allocate a new
fs_struct even if it h…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unshare: fix unshare_fs() handling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s an unpleasant corner case in unshare(2), when we have a
CLONE_NEWNS in flags and current-&amp;gt;fs hadn&amp;#39;t been shared at all; in that
case copy_mnt_ns() gets passed current-&amp;gt;fs instead of a private copy,
which causes interesting warts in proof of correctness]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; I guess if private means fs-&amp;gt;users == 1, the condition could still be true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, it&amp;#39;s worse than just a convoluted proof of correctness.
Consider the case when we have CLONE_NEWCGROUP in addition to CLONE_NEWNS
(and current-&amp;gt;fs-&amp;gt;users == 1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We pass current-&amp;gt;fs to copy_mnt_ns(), all right.  Suppose it succeeds and
flips current-&amp;gt;fs-&amp;gt;{pwd,root} to corresponding locations in the new namespace.
Now we proceed to copy_cgroup_ns(), which fails (e.g. with -ENOMEM).
We call put_mnt_ns() on the namespace created by copy_mnt_ns(), it&amp;#39;s
destroyed and its mount tree is dissolved, but...  current-&amp;gt;fs-&amp;gt;root and
current-&amp;gt;fs-&amp;gt;pwd are both left pointing to now detached mounts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They are pinning those, so it&amp;#39;s not a UAF, but it leaves the calling
process with unshare(2) failing with -ENOMEM _and_ leaving it with
pwd and root on detached isolated mounts.  The last part is clearly a bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is other fun related to that mess (races with pivot_root(), including
the one between pivot_root() and fork(), of all things), but this one
is easy to isolate and fix - treat CLONE_NEWNS as &amp;#34;allocate a new
fs_struct even if it h…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-43472</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USN-8567-1 — linux, linux-gcp, linux-gcp-6.8, linux-gke, linux-gkeop, linux-realtime, linux-realtime-6.8 vulnerabilities</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-8567-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: linux-gcp-6.8, Ubuntu:Pro:Realtime:22.04:LTS: linux-realtime-6.8, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gke, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gkeop, Ubuntu:Pro:Realtime:24.04:LTS: linux-realtime&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Charact…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: linux-gcp-6.8, Ubuntu:Pro:Realtime:22.04:LTS: linux-realtime-6.8, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gke, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gkeop, Ubuntu:Pro:Realtime:24.04:LTS: linux-realtime&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that some AMD processors did not properly clear data in
the floating point divider unit during speculative execution. A local
attacker could use this to expose sensitive information. (CVE-2025-54505)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that some AMD Zen 2 processors did not properly isolate
shared resources in the operation cache. A local attacker could possibly
use this issue to corrupt instructions executed at a higher privilege
level, resulting in privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-54518)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that some AMD Zen 5 processors supporting RDSEED
instruction did not properly handle entropy, potentially resulting in the
consumption of insufficiently random values. A local attacker could
possibly use this issue to influence the values returned by the RDSEED
instruction causing loss of confidentiality and integrity. (CVE-2025-62626)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - RISC-V architecture;
  - S390 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Block layer subsystem;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - ACPI drivers;
  - Serial ATA and Parallel ATA drivers;
  - Drivers core;
  - Power management core;
  - DRBD Distributed Replicated Block Device drivers;
  - Rados block device (RBD) driver;
  - Compressed RAM block device driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Bus devices;
  - Charact…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-8567-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
