<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-23086 — vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-23086</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The virtio transports derives its TX credit directly from peer_buf_alloc,
which is set from the remote endpoint&amp;#39;s SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the host side this means that the amount of data we are willing to
queue for a connection is scaled by a guest-chosen buffer size, rather
than the host&amp;#39;s own vsock configuration. A malicious guest can advertise
a large buffer and read slowly, causing the host to allocate a
correspondingly large amount of sk_buff memory.
The same thing would happen in the guest with a malicious host, since
virtio transports share the same code base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Introduce a small helper, virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(), that
returns min(peer_buf_alloc, buf_alloc), and use it wherever we consume
peer_buf_alloc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This ensures the effective TX window is bounded by both the peer&amp;#39;s
advertised buffer and our own buf_alloc (already clamped to
buffer_max_size via SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE), so a remote peer
cannot force the other to queue more data than allowed by its own
vsock settings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On an unpatched Ubuntu 22.04 host (~64 GiB RAM), running a PoC with
32 guest vsock connections advertising 2 GiB each and reading slowly
drove Slab/SUnreclaim from ~0.5 GiB to ~57 GiB; the system only
recovered after killing the QEMU process. That said, if QEMU memory is
limited with cgroups, the maximum memory used will be limited.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With this patch applied:…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 CPU 1518F-4 PN/DP MFP, Siemens SIPLUS S7-1500 CPU 1518-4 PN/DP MFP&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;vsock/virtio: cap TX credit to local buffer size&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The virtio transports derives its TX credit directly from peer_buf_alloc,
which is set from the remote endpoint&amp;#39;s SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the host side this means that the amount of data we are willing to
queue for a connection is scaled by a guest-chosen buffer size, rather
than the host&amp;#39;s own vsock configuration. A malicious guest can advertise
a large buffer and read slowly, causing the host to allocate a
correspondingly large amount of sk_buff memory.
The same thing would happen in the guest with a malicious host, since
virtio transports share the same code base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Introduce a small helper, virtio_transport_tx_buf_size(), that
returns min(peer_buf_alloc, buf_alloc), and use it wherever we consume
peer_buf_alloc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This ensures the effective TX window is bounded by both the peer&amp;#39;s
advertised buffer and our own buf_alloc (already clamped to
buffer_max_size via SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_MAX_SIZE), so a remote peer
cannot force the other to queue more data than allowed by its own
vsock settings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On an unpatched Ubuntu 22.04 host (~64 GiB RAM), running a PoC with
32 guest vsock connections advertising 2 GiB each and reading slowly
drove Slab/SUnreclaim from ~0.5 GiB to ~57 GiB; the system only
recovered after killing the QEMU process. That said, if QEMU memory is
limited with cgroups, the maximum memory used will be limited.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With this patch applied:…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-23086</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USN-8278-1 — linux, linux-aws, linux-aws-fips, linux-gcp, linux-gcp-fips, linux-gke, linux-gkeop, linux-ibm, linux-ibm-6.8, linux-lo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-8278-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: linux-ibm-6.8, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.8, Ubuntu:Pro:Realtime:22.04:LTS: linux-realtime-6.8, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gke, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gkeop, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-ibm, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-lowlatency and 5 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that the Linux kernel algif_aead module did not properly
handle in-place cryptographic operations. This flaw is known as Copy Fail.
A local attacker could use this to escalate privileges, or possibly escape
a container. (CVE-2026-31431)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - Drivers core;
  - Null block device driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Intel Trace Hub HW tracing drivers;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - On-Chip Interconnect management framework;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - Modular ISDN driver;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - UACCE accelerator framework;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Network drivers;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PHY drivers;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - W1 Dallas&amp;#39;s 1-wire bus driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - EFI Variable file system;
  - exFAT file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) client;
  - N…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: linux-ibm-6.8, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.8, Ubuntu:Pro:Realtime:22.04:LTS: linux-realtime-6.8, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gke, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-gkeop, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-ibm, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: linux-lowlatency and 5 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that the Linux kernel algif_aead module did not properly
handle in-place cryptographic operations. This flaw is known as Copy Fail.
A local attacker could use this to escalate privileges, or possibly escape
a container. (CVE-2026-31431)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several security issues were discovered in the Linux kernel.
An attacker could possibly use these to compromise the system.
This update corrects flaws in the following subsystems:
  - ARM64 architecture;
  - x86 architecture;
  - Cryptographic API;
  - Compute Acceleration Framework;
  - Drivers core;
  - Null block device driver;
  - Ublk userspace block driver;
  - Bluetooth drivers;
  - Counter interface drivers;
  - DMA engine subsystem;
  - DPLL subsystem;
  - GPU drivers;
  - HID subsystem;
  - Intel Trace Hub HW tracing drivers;
  - IIO ADC drivers;
  - IIO subsystem;
  - On-Chip Interconnect management framework;
  - IRQ chip drivers;
  - Modular ISDN driver;
  - LED subsystem;
  - Multiple devices driver;
  - UACCE accelerator framework;
  - MMC subsystem;
  - Ethernet bonding driver;
  - Network drivers;
  - Mellanox network drivers;
  - NVME drivers;
  - PHY drivers;
  - x86 platform drivers;
  - i.MX PM domains;
  - SCSI subsystem;
  - SLIMbus drivers;
  - SPI subsystem;
  - TCM subsystem;
  - W1 Dallas&amp;#39;s 1-wire bus driver;
  - Xen hypervisor drivers;
  - BTRFS file system;
  - EFI Variable file system;
  - exFAT file system;
  - Ext4 file system;
  - HFS+ file system;
  - Network file system (NFS) client;
  - N…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-8278-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
