<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-69418 — Unauthenticated/unencrypted trailing bytes with low-level OCB function calls</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-69418</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenSSL, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;other hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Impact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;cleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;allowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;stream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;pointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;base pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;leaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;also excludes the true tail bytes.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;However, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;higher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;blocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;CRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;non-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severit…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenSSL, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: When using the low-level OCB API directly with AES-NI or&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;other hardware-accelerated code paths, inputs whose length is not a multiple&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of 16 bytes can leave the final partial block unencrypted and unauthenticated.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Impact summary: The trailing 1-15 bytes of a message may be exposed in&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;cleartext on encryption and are not covered by the authentication tag,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;allowing an attacker to read or tamper with those bytes without detection.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The low-level OCB encrypt and decrypt routines in the hardware-accelerated&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;stream path process full 16-byte blocks but do not advance the input/output&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;pointers. The subsequent tail-handling code then operates on the original&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;base pointers, effectively reprocessing the beginning of the buffer while&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;leaving the actual trailing bytes unprocessed. The authentication checksum&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;also excludes the true tail bytes.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;However, typical OpenSSL consumers using EVP are not affected because the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;higher-level EVP and provider OCB implementations split inputs so that full&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;blocks and trailing partial blocks are processed in separate calls, avoiding&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;the problematic code path. Additionally, TLS does not use OCB ciphersuites.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The vulnerability only affects applications that call the low-level&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;CRYPTO_ocb128_encrypt() or CRYPTO_ocb128_decrypt() functions directly with&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;non-block-aligned lengths in a single call on hardware-accelerated builds.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;For these reasons the issue was assessed as Low severit…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-69418</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USN-7980-1 — openssl vulnerabilities</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-7980-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:25.10: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanislav Fort, Petr Šimeček, and Hamza discovered that OpenSSL
incorrectly validated PBMAC1 parameters when doing PKCS#12 MAC
verification. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to
crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu
25.10. (CVE-2025-11187)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly parsed CMS
AuthEnvelopedData messages. An attacker could possibly use this issue to
cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2025-15467)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory in the
SSL_CIPHER_find() function. An attacker could possibly use this issue to
cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only
affected Ubuntu 25.10. (CVE-2025-15468)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanislav Fort discovered that the OpenSSL &amp;#34;openssl dgst&amp;#34; command line
tool incorrectly truncated data to 16MB. An attacker could posibly use this
issue to hide unauthenticated data beyond the 16MB limit. This issue only
affected Ubuntu 25.10. (CVE-2025-15469)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tomas Dulka and Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled
memory with TLS 1.3 connections using certificate compression. An attacker
could possibly use this issue to consume resources, leading to a denial of
service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 25.10. (CVE-2025-66199)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Petr Simecek and Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled
memory when writing large data into a BIO chain. An attacker could possibly
use this issue to con…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: openssl, Ubuntu:25.10: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanislav Fort, Petr Šimeček, and Hamza discovered that OpenSSL
incorrectly validated PBMAC1 parameters when doing PKCS#12 MAC
verification. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to
crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu
25.10. (CVE-2025-11187)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly parsed CMS
AuthEnvelopedData messages. An attacker could possibly use this issue to
cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2025-15467)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory in the
SSL_CIPHER_find() function. An attacker could possibly use this issue to
cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only
affected Ubuntu 25.10. (CVE-2025-15468)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stanislav Fort discovered that the OpenSSL &amp;#34;openssl dgst&amp;#34; command line
tool incorrectly truncated data to 16MB. An attacker could posibly use this
issue to hide unauthenticated data beyond the 16MB limit. This issue only
affected Ubuntu 25.10. (CVE-2025-15469)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tomas Dulka and Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled
memory with TLS 1.3 connections using certificate compression. An attacker
could possibly use this issue to consume resources, leading to a denial of
service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 25.10. (CVE-2025-66199)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Petr Simecek and Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled
memory when writing large data into a BIO chain. An attacker could possibly
use this issue to con…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-7980-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
