<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 20:29:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-29857</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-29857</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; bouncycastle bc-java, bouncycastle bc-fja, bouncycastle bc_c_.net&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in ECCurve.java and ECCurve.cs in Bouncy Castle Java (BC Java) before 1.78, BC Java LTS before 2.73.6, BC-FJA before 1.0.2.5, and BC C# .Net before 2.3.1. Importing an EC certificate with crafted F2m parameters can lead to excessive CPU consumption during the evaluation of the curve parameters.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; bouncycastle bc-java, bouncycastle bc-fja, bouncycastle bc_c_.net&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in ECCurve.java and ECCurve.cs in Bouncy Castle Java (BC Java) before 1.78, BC Java LTS before 2.73.6, BC-FJA before 1.0.2.5, and BC C# .Net before 2.3.1. Importing an EC certificate with crafted F2m parameters can lead to excessive CPU consumption during the evaluation of the curve parameters.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-29857</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USN-8108-1 — bouncycastle vulnerabilities</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-8108-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS: bouncycastle&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that Bouncy Castle did not sanitize user input when
inserting it into an LDAP search filter. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to perform an LDAP injection attack. This issue only affected
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
(CVE-2023-33201)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled specially crafted
F2m parameters in the ECCurve algorithm. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to cause Bouncy Castle to use excessive resources, leading to a
denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04
LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-29857)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that Bouncy Castle leaked timing information when
handling exceptions during an RSA handshake. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to obtain sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu
18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
(CVE-2024-30171)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled endpoint
identification with an SSL socket enabled without an explicit hostname. An
attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a DNS poisoning attack.
This issue only affected Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu
24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-34447)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bing Shi discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled resource memory
allocation. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bouncy
Castle to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of serv…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS: bouncycastle, Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS: bouncycastle&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that Bouncy Castle did not sanitize user input when
inserting it into an LDAP search filter. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to perform an LDAP injection attack. This issue only affected
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
(CVE-2023-33201)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled specially crafted
F2m parameters in the ECCurve algorithm. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to cause Bouncy Castle to use excessive resources, leading to a
denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04
LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-29857)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that Bouncy Castle leaked timing information when
handling exceptions during an RSA handshake. An attacker could possibly use
this issue to obtain sensitive information. This issue only affected Ubuntu
18.04 LTS, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS.
(CVE-2024-30171)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled endpoint
identification with an SSL socket enabled without an explicit hostname. An
attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a DNS poisoning attack.
This issue only affected Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu
24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-34447)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bing Shi discovered that Bouncy Castle incorrectly handled resource memory
allocation. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bouncy
Castle to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of serv…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/usn-8108-1</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
