<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:23:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-64849 — MLflow: Unauthenticated full-read SSRF in webhook delivery: _validate_webhook_url bypassed via unvalidated HTTP redirec…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-64849</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; mlflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MLflow is an open source AI engineering platform for agents, large language models, and machine learning models. Starting in 3.3.0 and prior to 3.15.0, the unauthenticated POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{id}/test endpoint calls _validate_webhook_url() in mlflow/utils/validation.py only for the original URL while mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py follows redirects and re-resolves the hostname without pinning the validated address, allowing attackers to reach internal or cloud metadata services and receive response_status and response_body. This issue is fixed in version 3.15.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; mlflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MLflow is an open source AI engineering platform for agents, large language models, and machine learning models. Starting in 3.3.0 and prior to 3.15.0, the unauthenticated POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{id}/test endpoint calls _validate_webhook_url() in mlflow/utils/validation.py only for the original URL while mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py follows redirects and re-resolves the hostname without pinning the validated address, allowing attackers to reach internal or cloud metadata services and receive response_status and response_body. This issue is fixed in version 3.15.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-64849</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7gwp-5pfp-969j — MLflow: Unauthenticated full-read SSRF in webhook delivery: _validate_webhook_url bypassed via unvalidated HTTP redirec…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7gwp-5pfp-969j</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: mlflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
The default MLflow Tracking Server (`mlflow server`, no authentication, default SQLite backend) exposes the model-registry webhooks API unauthenticated, including a synchronous `POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{id}/test` endpoint that returns the upstream response status and body to the caller. The SSRF guard added in PR #20747 (`_validate_webhook_url`, shipped in 3.10.0) resolves the webhook hostname and rejects non-public IPs, but it is bypassable: delivery follows HTTP redirects (no `allow_redirects=False`) and never pins the validated IP. An attacker hosts a public HTTPS endpoint that passes the guard and returns `302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/...` (or `http://127.0.0.1:...`); MLflow follows it and never re-validates the redirect target. Because `/test` reflects the response body, this is an unauthenticated full-read SSRF on a default server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
Three facts combine:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Webhook endpoints are unauthenticated on a default server. The only webhook authorization lives in the optional auth plugin (`mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py`, `WEBHOOK_BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS`), which is not loaded by default.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. The guard validates but pins nothing — `mlflow/utils/validation.py` `_validate_webhook_url`:
```python
schemes = _MLFLOW_WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_SCHEMES.get()        # default [&amp;#34;https&amp;#34;]
if parsed_url.scheme not in schemes: raise ...
if not _MLFLOW_WEBHOOK_ALLOW_PRIVATE_IPS.get():        # default False
    for addr_info in socket.getaddrinfo(hostname, None):…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: mlflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
The default MLflow Tracking Server (`mlflow server`, no authentication, default SQLite backend) exposes the model-registry webhooks API unauthenticated, including a synchronous `POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{id}/test` endpoint that returns the upstream response status and body to the caller. The SSRF guard added in PR #20747 (`_validate_webhook_url`, shipped in 3.10.0) resolves the webhook hostname and rejects non-public IPs, but it is bypassable: delivery follows HTTP redirects (no `allow_redirects=False`) and never pins the validated IP. An attacker hosts a public HTTPS endpoint that passes the guard and returns `302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/...` (or `http://127.0.0.1:...`); MLflow follows it and never re-validates the redirect target. Because `/test` reflects the response body, this is an unauthenticated full-read SSRF on a default server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
Three facts combine:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Webhook endpoints are unauthenticated on a default server. The only webhook authorization lives in the optional auth plugin (`mlflow/server/auth/__init__.py`, `WEBHOOK_BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS`), which is not loaded by default.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. The guard validates but pins nothing — `mlflow/utils/validation.py` `_validate_webhook_url`:
```python
schemes = _MLFLOW_WEBHOOK_ALLOWED_SCHEMES.get()        # default [&amp;#34;https&amp;#34;]
if parsed_url.scheme not in schemes: raise ...
if not _MLFLOW_WEBHOOK_ALLOW_PRIVATE_IPS.get():        # default False
    for addr_info in socket.getaddrinfo(hostname, None):…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7gwp-5pfp-969j</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
