<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 13:50:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2020-15200 — Segfault in Tensorflow</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2020-15200</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; tensorflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; tensorflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Tensorflow before version 2.3.1, the `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the code sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow. A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault. The issue is patched in commit 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and is released in TensorFlow version 2.3.1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2020-15200</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-x7rp-74x2-mjf3 — Segfault in Tensorflow</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x7rp-74x2-mjf3</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: tensorflow, PyPI: tensorflow-cpu, PyPI: tensorflow-gpu&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
The `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the [following code](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/0e68f4d3295eb0281a517c3662f6698992b7b2cf/tensorflow/core/kernels/count_ops.cc#L248-L265
) sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow:
```cc
    auto per_batch_counts = BatchedMap&amp;lt;W&amp;gt;(num_batches);
    int batch_idx = 0;
    for (int idx = 0; idx &amp;lt; num_values; ++idx) {
      while (idx &amp;gt;= splits_values(batch_idx)) {
        batch_idx++;
      }
      const auto&amp;amp; value = values_values(idx);
      if (value &amp;gt;= 0 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; (maxlength_ &amp;lt;= 0 || value &amp;lt; maxlength_)) {
        per_batch_counts[batch_idx - 1][value] = 1;
      }
    }
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
We have patched the issue in 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and will release a patch release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We recommend users to upgrade to TensorFlow 2.3.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information
Please consult [our security guide](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: tensorflow, PyPI: tensorflow-cpu, PyPI: tensorflow-gpu&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
The `RaggedCountSparseOutput` implementation does not validate that the input arguments form a valid ragged tensor. In particular, there is no validation that the values in the `splits` tensor generate a valid partitioning of the `values` tensor. Thus, the [following code](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/0e68f4d3295eb0281a517c3662f6698992b7b2cf/tensorflow/core/kernels/count_ops.cc#L248-L265
) sets up conditions to cause a heap buffer overflow:
```cc
    auto per_batch_counts = BatchedMap&amp;lt;W&amp;gt;(num_batches);
    int batch_idx = 0;
    for (int idx = 0; idx &amp;lt; num_values; ++idx) {
      while (idx &amp;gt;= splits_values(batch_idx)) {
        batch_idx++;
      }
      const auto&amp;amp; value = values_values(idx);
      if (value &amp;gt;= 0 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; (maxlength_ &amp;lt;= 0 || value &amp;lt; maxlength_)) {
        per_batch_counts[batch_idx - 1][value] = 1;
      }
    }
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A `BatchedMap` is equivalent to a vector where each element is a hashmap. However, if the first element of `splits_values` is not 0, `batch_idx` will never be 1, hence there will be no hashmap at index 0 in `per_batch_counts`. Trying to access that in the user code results in a segmentation fault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches
We have patched the issue in 3cbb917b4714766030b28eba9fb41bb97ce9ee02 and will release a patch release.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We recommend users to upgrade to TensorFlow 2.3.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information
Please consult [our security guide](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/master/SECURITY.md) for more information regarding the…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x7rp-74x2-mjf3</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
