<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>RUSTSEC-2023-0029 — TLS certificate common name validation bypass</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2023-0029</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: nats&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NATS official Rust clients are vulnerable to MitM when using TLS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The common name of the server&amp;#39;s TLS certificate is validated against
the `host`name provided by the server&amp;#39;s plaintext `INFO` message
during the initial connection setup phase. A MitM proxy can tamper with
the `host` field&amp;#39;s value by substituting it with the common name of a
valid certificate it controls, fooling the client into accepting it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Reproduction steps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The NATS Rust client tries to establish a new connection
2. The connection is intercepted by a MitM proxy
3. The proxy makes a separate connection to the NATS server
4. The NATS server replies with an `INFO` message
5. The proxy reads the `INFO`, alters the `host` JSON field and passes
   the tampered `INFO` back to the client
6. The proxy upgrades the client connection to TLS, presenting a certificate issued
   by a certificate authority present in the client&amp;#39;s keychain.
   In the previous step the `host` was set to the common name of said certificate
7. `rustls` accepts the certificate, having verified that the common name matches the
   attacker-controlled value it was given
9. The client has been fooled by the MitM proxy into accepting the attacker-controlled certificate&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: nats&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The NATS official Rust clients are vulnerable to MitM when using TLS.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The common name of the server&amp;#39;s TLS certificate is validated against
the `host`name provided by the server&amp;#39;s plaintext `INFO` message
during the initial connection setup phase. A MitM proxy can tamper with
the `host` field&amp;#39;s value by substituting it with the common name of a
valid certificate it controls, fooling the client into accepting it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Reproduction steps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The NATS Rust client tries to establish a new connection
2. The connection is intercepted by a MitM proxy
3. The proxy makes a separate connection to the NATS server
4. The NATS server replies with an `INFO` message
5. The proxy reads the `INFO`, alters the `host` JSON field and passes
   the tampered `INFO` back to the client
6. The proxy upgrades the client connection to TLS, presenting a certificate issued
   by a certificate authority present in the client&amp;#39;s keychain.
   In the previous step the `host` was set to the common name of said certificate
7. `rustls` accepts the certificate, having verified that the common name matches the
   attacker-controlled value it was given
9. The client has been fooled by the MitM proxy into accepting the attacker-controlled certificate&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2023-0029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
