<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 10:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-45400 — Open WebUI: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) bypass in `validate_url`</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-45400</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; open-webui&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.5, a parsing difference between the urlparse and requests libraries led to an SSRF bypass vulnerability. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.5.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; open-webui&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.5, a parsing difference between the urlparse and requests libraries led to an SSRF bypass vulnerability. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.5.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-45400</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2026-2715 — Open WebUI has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) bypass in `validate_url`</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2715</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: open-webui&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
In the open-webui project, a parsing difference between the urlparse and requests libraries led to an SSRF bypass vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
In the current project, URL validation is performed using the function validate_url.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;1323&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;1145&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260322-202854-22-1&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/896d19f2-c7c3-499a-9052-12aea756ac47&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current checking logic uses urlparse to parse the hostname part of the URL for verification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;1122&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;429&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260322-203014-22-2&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/653520e9-e311-4a5e-8345-a2446e217d88&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, there are actually differences in parsing between urlparse and the library that actually sends the request. For example, in files.py, validate_url is used first for URL validation, and then requests.get is used to send the request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;1269&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;915&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260322-203122-22-3&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f200aa06-9190-425e-9659-1ecaf95f806b&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The core issue: `urlparse()` and `requests` disagree on which host a URL like `http://127.0.0.1:6666\@1.1.1.1` points to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `urlparse()` treats `\` as a regular character and `@` as the userinfo-host delimiter, so it extracts hostname as `1.1.1.1` (public)
- `requests` treats `\` as a path character, connecting to `127.0.0.1` (internal)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below is a test code I wrote following the open-webui code.
```
from __future__ import annotations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import ipaddress
import log…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: open-webui&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
In the open-webui project, a parsing difference between the urlparse and requests libraries led to an SSRF bypass vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
In the current project, URL validation is performed using the function validate_url.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;1323&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;1145&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260322-202854-22-1&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/896d19f2-c7c3-499a-9052-12aea756ac47&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current checking logic uses urlparse to parse the hostname part of the URL for verification.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;1122&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;429&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260322-203014-22-2&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/653520e9-e311-4a5e-8345-a2446e217d88&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, there are actually differences in parsing between urlparse and the library that actually sends the request. For example, in files.py, validate_url is used first for URL validation, and then requests.get is used to send the request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;img width=&amp;#34;1269&amp;#34; height=&amp;#34;915&amp;#34; alt=&amp;#34;QQ20260322-203122-22-3&amp;#34; src=&amp;#34;https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f200aa06-9190-425e-9659-1ecaf95f806b&amp;#34; /&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The core issue: `urlparse()` and `requests` disagree on which host a URL like `http://127.0.0.1:6666\@1.1.1.1` points to:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- `urlparse()` treats `\` as a regular character and `@` as the userinfo-host delimiter, so it extracts hostname as `1.1.1.1` (public)
- `requests` treats `\` as a path character, connecting to `127.0.0.1` (internal)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Below is a test code I wrote following the open-webui code.
```
from __future__ import annotations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;import ipaddress
import log…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-2715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
