<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 06:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2020-26281 — request smuggling in async-h1</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2020-26281</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; http-rs async-h1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;async-h1 is an asynchronous HTTP/1.1 parser for Rust (crates.io). There is a request smuggling vulnerability in async-h1 before version 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects any webserver that uses async-h1 behind a reverse proxy, including all such Tide applications. If the server does not read the body of a request which is longer than some buffer length, async-h1 will attempt to read a subsequent request from the body content starting at that offset into the body. One way to exploit this vulnerability would be for an adversary to craft a request such that the body contains a request that would not be noticed by a reverse proxy, allowing it to forge forwarded/x-forwarded headers. If an application trusted the authenticity of these headers, it could be misled by the smuggled request. Another potential concern with this vulnerability is that if a reverse proxy is sending multiple http clients&amp;#39; requests along the same keep-alive connection, it would be possible for the smuggled request to specify a long content and capture another user&amp;#39;s request in its body. This content could be captured in a post request to an endpoint that allows the content to be subsequently retrieved by the adversary. This has been addressed in async-h1 2.3.0 and previous versions have been yanked.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; http-rs async-h1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;async-h1 is an asynchronous HTTP/1.1 parser for Rust (crates.io). There is a request smuggling vulnerability in async-h1 before version 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects any webserver that uses async-h1 behind a reverse proxy, including all such Tide applications. If the server does not read the body of a request which is longer than some buffer length, async-h1 will attempt to read a subsequent request from the body content starting at that offset into the body. One way to exploit this vulnerability would be for an adversary to craft a request such that the body contains a request that would not be noticed by a reverse proxy, allowing it to forge forwarded/x-forwarded headers. If an application trusted the authenticity of these headers, it could be misled by the smuggled request. Another potential concern with this vulnerability is that if a reverse proxy is sending multiple http clients&amp;#39; requests along the same keep-alive connection, it would be possible for the smuggled request to specify a long content and capture another user&amp;#39;s request in its body. This content could be captured in a post request to an endpoint that allows the content to be subsequently retrieved by the adversary. This has been addressed in async-h1 2.3.0 and previous versions have been yanked.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2020-26281</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RUSTSEC-2020-0093 — Async-h1 request smuggling possible with long unread bodies</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2020-0093</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: async-h1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This vulnerability affects any webserver that uses async-h1 behind a reverse proxy, including all such Tide applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the server does not read the body of a request which is longer than some buffer length, async-h1 will attempt to read a subsequent request from the body content starting at that offset into the body.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One way to exploit this vulnerability would be for an adversary to craft a request such that the body contains a request that would not be noticed by a reverse proxy, allowing it to forge forwarded/x-forwarded headers. If an application trusted the authenticity of these headers, it could be misled by the smuggled request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another potential concern with this vulnerability is that if a reverse proxy is sending multiple http clients&amp;#39; requests along the same keep-alive connection, it would be possible for the smuggled request to specify a long content and capture another user&amp;#39;s request in its body. This content could be captured in a post request to an endpoint that allows the content to be subsequently retrieved by the adversary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The flaw was corrected in commit [7df79f](https://github.com/http-rs/async-h1/commit/7df79f1d5d99fc0f492b315eebc7f0d301a85212) by ensuring that the request body is always consumed from the tcp stream before attempting to read subsequent keep-alive request headers from it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: async-h1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This vulnerability affects any webserver that uses async-h1 behind a reverse proxy, including all such Tide applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the server does not read the body of a request which is longer than some buffer length, async-h1 will attempt to read a subsequent request from the body content starting at that offset into the body.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One way to exploit this vulnerability would be for an adversary to craft a request such that the body contains a request that would not be noticed by a reverse proxy, allowing it to forge forwarded/x-forwarded headers. If an application trusted the authenticity of these headers, it could be misled by the smuggled request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another potential concern with this vulnerability is that if a reverse proxy is sending multiple http clients&amp;#39; requests along the same keep-alive connection, it would be possible for the smuggled request to specify a long content and capture another user&amp;#39;s request in its body. This content could be captured in a post request to an endpoint that allows the content to be subsequently retrieved by the adversary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The flaw was corrected in commit [7df79f](https://github.com/http-rs/async-h1/commit/7df79f1d5d99fc0f492b315eebc7f0d301a85212) by ensuring that the request body is always consumed from the tcp stream before attempting to read subsequent keep-alive request headers from it.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2020-0093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
