<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:44:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-100555 — OpenClaw before 2026.8.1 DNS Rebinding via attachment delivery</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-100555</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenClaw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenClaw is an npm-distributed gateway application. In versions &amp;gt;= 2026.7.1 and &amp;lt; 2026.8.1, Synology Chat attachment delivery could lose DNS pinning: the Gateway validated a single DNS result for a supplied file URL but then passed the original hostname to the Synology NAS, where it could resolve to a different destination. When attachment delivery accepted a remotely influenced hostname, an attacker could use DNS rebinding to make the NAS fetch a private or otherwise policy-denied resource and return its contents to the addressed conversation (server-side request forgery). Practical impact depends on NAS routing, resolver behavior, and the response available at the private destination. The issue is fixed in 2026.8.1; as a workaround, disable remote URL attachment forwarding in Synology Chat.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; OpenClaw&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenClaw is an npm-distributed gateway application. In versions &amp;gt;= 2026.7.1 and &amp;lt; 2026.8.1, Synology Chat attachment delivery could lose DNS pinning: the Gateway validated a single DNS result for a supplied file URL but then passed the original hostname to the Synology NAS, where it could resolve to a different destination. When attachment delivery accepted a remotely influenced hostname, an attacker could use DNS rebinding to make the NAS fetch a private or otherwise policy-denied resource and return its contents to the addressed conversation (server-side request forgery). Practical impact depends on NAS routing, resolver behavior, and the response available at the private destination. The issue is fixed in 2026.8.1; as a workaround, disable remote URL attachment forwarding in Synology Chat.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-100555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
