<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2026-89762 — apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-89762</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AppArmor&amp;#39;s begin_current_label_crit_section() is a scary function called
from lots of LSM hooks (in particular VFS/socket-related ones) that checks
if the label referenced by the current creds is marked FLAG_STALE, and if
so, attempts to use aa_replace_current_label() to replace the creds with an
updated version that uses a new label.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first problem with this is that it would directly lead to UAF of
`struct cred` if anything in the kernel takes a pointer to the current
creds and accesses these past a security hook invocation that replaces
creds, like so:
```
const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
alloc_file_pseudo(...);
uid_t uid = cred-&amp;gt;euid;
```
I don&amp;#39;t know if anything in the kernel actually does this, but I think it
is very surprising that this pattern could lead to UAF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second problem is that things go wrong when aa_replace_current_label()
runs with overridden credentials. aa_replace_current_label() bails out if
`current_cred() != current_real_cred()` (mirroring the check in
proc_pid_attr_write()), but this check can&amp;#39;t actually reliably detect
overridden credentials because the overridden creds can be the same as the
objective creds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So in approximately the following scenario, things go wrong:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. task begins with &amp;lt;creds A&amp;gt; (as both objective and subjective creds),
   with refcount=2
2. task grabs an extra reference on &amp;lt;c…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;apparmor: fix cred UAF caused by begin_current_label_crit_section()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AppArmor&amp;#39;s begin_current_label_crit_section() is a scary function called
from lots of LSM hooks (in particular VFS/socket-related ones) that checks
if the label referenced by the current creds is marked FLAG_STALE, and if
so, attempts to use aa_replace_current_label() to replace the creds with an
updated version that uses a new label.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first problem with this is that it would directly lead to UAF of
`struct cred` if anything in the kernel takes a pointer to the current
creds and accesses these past a security hook invocation that replaces
creds, like so:
```
const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
alloc_file_pseudo(...);
uid_t uid = cred-&amp;gt;euid;
```
I don&amp;#39;t know if anything in the kernel actually does this, but I think it
is very surprising that this pattern could lead to UAF.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second problem is that things go wrong when aa_replace_current_label()
runs with overridden credentials. aa_replace_current_label() bails out if
`current_cred() != current_real_cred()` (mirroring the check in
proc_pid_attr_write()), but this check can&amp;#39;t actually reliably detect
overridden credentials because the overridden creds can be the same as the
objective creds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So in approximately the following scenario, things go wrong:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. task begins with &amp;lt;creds A&amp;gt; (as both objective and subjective creds),
   with refcount=2
2. task grabs an extra reference on &amp;lt;c…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2026-89762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
