<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2022-49089 — IB/rdmavt: add lock to call to rvt_error_qp to prevent a race condition</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-49089</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IB/rdmavt: add lock to call to rvt_error_qp to prevent a race condition&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The documentation of the function rvt_error_qp says both r_lock and s_lock
need to be held when calling that function.  It also asserts using lockdep
that both of those locks are held.  However, the commit I referenced in
Fixes accidentally makes the call to rvt_error_qp in rvt_ruc_loopback no
longer covered by r_lock.  This results in the lockdep assertion failing
and also possibly in a race condition.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IB/rdmavt: add lock to call to rvt_error_qp to prevent a race condition&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The documentation of the function rvt_error_qp says both r_lock and s_lock
need to be held when calling that function.  It also asserts using lockdep
that both of those locks are held.  However, the commit I referenced in
Fixes accidentally makes the call to rvt_error_qp in rvt_ruc_loopback no
longer covered by r_lock.  This results in the lockdep assertion failing
and also possibly in a race condition.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-49089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
