<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 09:04:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2022-48827 — NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-48827</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P, Siemens SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family, Siemens SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dan Aloni reports:
&amp;gt; Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (&amp;#34;NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to
&amp;gt; the RPC read layers&amp;#34;) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up
&amp;gt; to server rsize of 0x1000.
&amp;gt;
&amp;gt; As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size
&amp;gt; 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset
&amp;gt; 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server
&amp;gt; and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as
&amp;gt; a result indefinitely retries the request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all
NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a
READ.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed
and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent
the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to
be consistent with Solaris NFS servers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These
must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit
type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks
against sb-&amp;gt;s_maxbytes do not work properly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux, Siemens RUGGEDCOM RST2428P, Siemens SCALANCE XC-300/XR-300/XC-400/XR-500WG/XR-500 family, Siemens SCALANCE XCM-/XRM-/XCH-/XRH-300 family, Siemens SIMATIC S7-1500 TM MFP - GNU/Linux subsystem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NFSD: Fix the behavior of READ near OFFSET_MAX&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dan Aloni reports:
&amp;gt; Due to commit 8cfb9015280d (&amp;#34;NFS: Always provide aligned buffers to
&amp;gt; the RPC read layers&amp;#34;) on the client, a read of 0xfff is aligned up
&amp;gt; to server rsize of 0x1000.
&amp;gt;
&amp;gt; As a result, in a test where the server has a file of size
&amp;gt; 0x7fffffffffffffff, and the client tries to read from the offset
&amp;gt; 0x7ffffffffffff000, the read causes loff_t overflow in the server
&amp;gt; and it returns an NFS code of EINVAL to the client. The client as
&amp;gt; a result indefinitely retries the request.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux NFS client does not handle NFS?ERR_INVAL, even though all
NFS specifications permit servers to return that status code for a
READ.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead of NFS?ERR_INVAL, have out-of-range READ requests succeed
and return a short result. Set the EOF flag in the result to prevent
the client from retrying the READ request. This behavior appears to
be consistent with Solaris NFS servers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that NFSv3 and NFSv4 use u64 offset values on the wire. These
must be converted to loff_t internally before use -- an implicit
type cast is not adequate for this purpose. Otherwise VFS checks
against sb-&amp;gt;s_maxbytes do not work properly.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-48827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
