<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:34:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2022-49208 — RDMA/irdma: Prevent some integer underflows</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-49208</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/irdma: Prevent some integer underflows&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My static checker complains that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/ctrl.c:3605 irdma_sc_ceq_init()
    warn: can subtract underflow &amp;#39;info-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;hmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs&amp;#39;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It appears that &amp;#34;info-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;hmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs&amp;#34; comes from the firmware
in irdma_sc_parse_fpm_query_buf() so, yes, there is a chance that it could
be zero.  Even if we trust the firmware, it&amp;#39;s easy enough to change the
condition just as a hardenning measure.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/irdma: Prevent some integer underflows&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My static checker complains that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drivers/infiniband/hw/irdma/ctrl.c:3605 irdma_sc_ceq_init()
    warn: can subtract underflow &amp;#39;info-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;hmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs&amp;#39;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It appears that &amp;#34;info-&amp;gt;dev-&amp;gt;hmc_fpm_misc.max_ceqs&amp;#34; comes from the firmware
in irdma_sc_parse_fpm_query_buf() so, yes, there is a chance that it could
be zero.  Even if we trust the firmware, it&amp;#39;s easy enough to change the
condition just as a hardenning measure.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-49208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
