<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 04:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-375238</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-375238</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-375238</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-375238</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-82405</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-82405</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.20, the KleverUpdateAccountPermission built-in authorizes replacement of a target account&amp;#39;s permissions by checking attacker-controlled vmInput.RecipientAddr instead of authenticated vmInput.CallerAddr. An attacker-controlled contract can choose a victim account with configured permissions as RecipientAddr, and contractHasValidPermission can accept the victim&amp;#39;s default self-signer as authorization. UpdatePermission can then replace the victim&amp;#39;s entire permission set with attacker-supplied Owner permissions, enabling asset theft or permanent lockout without a victim key or signature. Accounts without stored permissions and the native transaction path are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.20.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.20, the KleverUpdateAccountPermission built-in authorizes replacement of a target account&amp;#39;s permissions by checking attacker-controlled vmInput.RecipientAddr instead of authenticated vmInput.CallerAddr. An attacker-controlled contract can choose a victim account with configured permissions as RecipientAddr, and contractHasValidPermission can accept the victim&amp;#39;s default self-signer as authorization. UpdatePermission can then replace the victim&amp;#39;s entire permission set with attacker-supplied Owner permissions, enabling asset theft or permanent lockout without a victim key or signature. Accounts without stored permissions and the native transaction path are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.20.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-82405</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-97cv-x867-6xhm — Klever-Go Account takeover: `kleverUpdateAccountPermission` authorizes on attacker-controlled `RecipientAddr` instead o…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-97cv-x867-6xhm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/klever-io/klever-go&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Description&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The VM built-in function `KleverUpdateAccountPermission` (registered always-active, `creator.go:381-390` / `core/vmconstants.go:234`) rewrites an account&amp;#39;s entire permission set. Its authorization check uses `vmInput.RecipientAddr` **attacker-controlled**  instead of the authenticated `vmInput.CallerAddr`. The sibling handler `kleverChangeOwnerAddress.go:86` uses `vmInput.CallerAddr` correctly, so the safe pattern exists in-repo; this handler deviates. The native transaction path (`txProcess.go:833`) is safe  it uses `tx.GetSender()`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mechanism:
1. **Wrong variable:** `CallerAddr` is never referenced in the handler; auth is `contractHasValidPermission(target.GetPermissions(), RecipientAddr)`, which returns true if `RecipientAddr` is a signer with `Weight &amp;gt;= Threshold` in the *target* account&amp;#39;s permissions and the permission grants `UpdateAccountPermissionContractType`.
2. **RecipientAddr is attacker-controlled:** when a contract calls a built-in via `ExecuteOnDestContextWithTypedArgs` (`baseOps.go:1967`), `prepareIndirectContractCallInput` (`baseOps.go:2485`) sets `RecipientAddr = destination` (contract-chosen) and `CallerAddr = the calling contract`. The blockchain hook (`blockChainHook.go:454/467`) dispatches on `input.Function` and passes the input through unchanged; no guard forces `RecipientAddr == CallerAddr` and there is no SC-destination validation on this path.
3. **Self-signer default satisfies the check:** `createDefaultOwnerPermission` (`account…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/klever-io/klever-go&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Description&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The VM built-in function `KleverUpdateAccountPermission` (registered always-active, `creator.go:381-390` / `core/vmconstants.go:234`) rewrites an account&amp;#39;s entire permission set. Its authorization check uses `vmInput.RecipientAddr` **attacker-controlled**  instead of the authenticated `vmInput.CallerAddr`. The sibling handler `kleverChangeOwnerAddress.go:86` uses `vmInput.CallerAddr` correctly, so the safe pattern exists in-repo; this handler deviates. The native transaction path (`txProcess.go:833`) is safe  it uses `tx.GetSender()`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mechanism:
1. **Wrong variable:** `CallerAddr` is never referenced in the handler; auth is `contractHasValidPermission(target.GetPermissions(), RecipientAddr)`, which returns true if `RecipientAddr` is a signer with `Weight &amp;gt;= Threshold` in the *target* account&amp;#39;s permissions and the permission grants `UpdateAccountPermissionContractType`.
2. **RecipientAddr is attacker-controlled:** when a contract calls a built-in via `ExecuteOnDestContextWithTypedArgs` (`baseOps.go:1967`), `prepareIndirectContractCallInput` (`baseOps.go:2485`) sets `RecipientAddr = destination` (contract-chosen) and `CallerAddr = the calling contract`. The blockchain hook (`blockChainHook.go:454/467`) dispatches on `input.Function` and passes the input through unchanged; no guard forces `RecipientAddr == CallerAddr` and there is no SC-destination validation on this path.
3. **Self-signer default satisfies the check:** `createDefaultOwnerPermission` (`account…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-97cv-x867-6xhm</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
