<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:10:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-15216</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-15216</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-15216</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-15216</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-80521</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-80521</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-80521</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1253 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1253</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1253</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1253</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-372818</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-372818</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-372818</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-372818</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-80521</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-80521</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Create two SCCs:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B
       ^--&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Run the following concurrently:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X
      2-2) close() both A and B&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges()
publishes a new edge (B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B) to GC but its skb is not queued
by skb_queue_tail().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered,
it judges A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot
collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B edge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B -. This edge is visible
       ^--&amp;#39;         ^..&amp;#39;  but skb is not&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge
B as dead as well and free it finally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;.&amp;gt; B -.
       ^--&amp;#39;         ^--&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, X&amp;#39;s SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(),
and it iterates over A through B&amp;#39;s scc_entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Create two SCCs:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B
       ^--&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Run the following concurrently:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X
      2-2) close() both A and B&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges()
publishes a new edge (B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B) to GC but its skb is not queued
by skb_queue_tail().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered,
it judges A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot
collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B edge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B -. This edge is visible
       ^--&amp;#39;         ^..&amp;#39;  but skb is not&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge
B as dead as well and free it finally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;.&amp;gt; B -.
       ^--&amp;#39;         ^--&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, X&amp;#39;s SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(),
and it iterates over A through B&amp;#39;s scc_entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-80521</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-g8mr-r59r-2xmq</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g8mr-r59r-2xmq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Create two SCCs:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B
       ^--&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Run the following concurrently:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X
      2-2) close() both A and B&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges()
publishes a new edge (B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B) to GC but its skb is not queued
by skb_queue_tail().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered,
it judges A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot
collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B edge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B -. This edge is visible
       ^--&amp;#39;         ^..&amp;#39;  but skb is not&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge
B as dead as well and free it finally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;.&amp;gt; B -.
       ^--&amp;#39;         ^--&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, X&amp;#39;s SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(),
and it iterates over A through B&amp;#39;s scc_entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) Create two SCCs:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B
       ^--&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Run the following concurrently:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X
      2-2) close() both A and B&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges()
publishes a new edge (B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B) to GC but its skb is not queued
by skb_queue_tail().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered,
it judges A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot
collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B edge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B -. This edge is visible
       ^--&amp;#39;         ^..&amp;#39;  but skb is not&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge
B as dead as well and free it finally.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;X -.   A &amp;lt;.&amp;gt; B -.
       ^--&amp;#39;         ^--&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, X&amp;#39;s SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(),
and it iterates over A through B&amp;#39;s scc_entry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#39;s unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g8mr-r59r-2xmq</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-80521 — af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge().</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-80521</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-80521</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-80521</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:77634 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security, bug fix, and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:77634</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel: fs/notify: call exportfs_encode_fid with s_umount kernel: ipv6: ioam: fix heap buffer overflow in __ioam6_fill_trace_data() kernel: udf: fix partition descriptor append bookkeeping kernel: sctp: purge outqueue on stale COOKIE-ECHO handling kernel: netfilter: synproxy: refresh tcphdr after skb_ensure_writable kernel: smb: client: fix double-free in SMB2_flush() replay kernel: Kernel SMB client: Double-free vulnerability allows remote denial of service or privilege escalation kernel: smb: client: fix query_info() replay double-free kernel: udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation kernel: af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge()&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel: fs/notify: call exportfs_encode_fid with s_umount kernel: ipv6: ioam: fix heap buffer overflow in __ioam6_fill_trace_data() kernel: udf: fix partition descriptor append bookkeeping kernel: sctp: purge outqueue on stale COOKIE-ECHO handling kernel: netfilter: synproxy: refresh tcphdr after skb_ensure_writable kernel: smb: client: fix double-free in SMB2_flush() replay kernel: Kernel SMB client: Double-free vulnerability allows remote denial of service or privilege escalation kernel: smb: client: fix query_info() replay double-free kernel: udp: fix potential use-after-free in tunnel segmentation kernel: af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge()&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:77634</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-80521</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-80521</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 154 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge(). Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially. The scenario is as follows:    1) Create two SCCs:        X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B        ^--&amp;#39;    2) Run the following concurrently:       2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X       2-2) close() both A and B At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges() publishes a new edge (B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B) to GC but its skb is not queued by skb_queue_tail(). If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered, it judges A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B edge.        X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B -. This edge is visible        ^--&amp;#39;         ^..&amp;#39;  but skb is not This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge B as dead as well and free it finally.        X -.   A &amp;lt;.&amp;gt; B -.        ^--&amp;#39;         ^--&amp;#39; However, X&amp;#39;s SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(), and it iterates over A through B&amp;#39;s scc_entry. Let&amp;#39;s unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 154 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Unlink scc_entry in unix_del_edge(). Kyle Zeng reported that GC could free a dead SCC partially. The scenario is as follows:    1) Create two SCCs:        X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B        ^--&amp;#39;    2) Run the following concurrently:       2-1) send() sk-B to sk-B from sk-X       2-2) close() both A and B At 2-1), there is a small window where unix_add_edges() publishes a new edge (B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B) to GC but its skb is not queued by skb_queue_tail(). If 2-2) completes before skb_queue_tail() and GC is triggered, it judges A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B as dead, but B is not freed because GC cannot collect the not-yet-queued skb holding the B &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B edge.        X -.   A &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; B -. This edge is visible        ^--&amp;#39;         ^..&amp;#39;  but skb is not This itself is not a problem since the next GC run will judge B as dead as well and free it finally.        X -.   A &amp;lt;.&amp;gt; B -.        ^--&amp;#39;         ^--&amp;#39; However, X&amp;#39;s SCC forces the next GC to call unix_walk_scc_fast(), and it iterates over A through B&amp;#39;s scc_entry. Let&amp;#39;s unlink scc_entry before freeing the vertex in unix_del_edge().&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-80521</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3042 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3042</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise die Ausführung von beliebigem Code, die Ausweitung von Berechtigungen, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Manipulation von Daten oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise die Ausführung von beliebigem Code, die Ausweitung von Berechtigungen, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Manipulation von Daten oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
