<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 22:41:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-362328</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-362328</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-362328</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-362328</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-78699</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-78699</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Unchecked Return Value vulnerability in ash-project ash_postgres allows a user who can drive a tenant rename to a name that collides with an existing tenant&amp;#39;s schema to have their tenant record repointed at that other tenant&amp;#39;s live schema, gaining access to its data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AshPostgres.MultiTenancy.rename_tenant/3 issues the ALTER SCHEMA ... RENAME TO ... with the non-raising Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query/2, discards its {:ok, _} | {:error, _} result, and unconditionally returns :ok. PostgreSQL rejects the rename when the target schema already exists (and on insufficient privilege or lock timeout), but that failure never reaches the caller. The calling manage_tenant update action therefore sees success and commits the tenant row with the new name, which is the schema of a different existing tenant, so subsequent reads and writes for that tenant run against the other tenant&amp;#39;s data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects ash_postgres: from 0.25.0 before 2.13.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Unchecked Return Value vulnerability in ash-project ash_postgres allows a user who can drive a tenant rename to a name that collides with an existing tenant&amp;#39;s schema to have their tenant record repointed at that other tenant&amp;#39;s live schema, gaining access to its data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AshPostgres.MultiTenancy.rename_tenant/3 issues the ALTER SCHEMA ... RENAME TO ... with the non-raising Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query/2, discards its {:ok, _} | {:error, _} result, and unconditionally returns :ok. PostgreSQL rejects the rename when the target schema already exists (and on insufficient privilege or lock timeout), but that failure never reaches the caller. The calling manage_tenant update action therefore sees success and commits the tenant row with the new name, which is the schema of a different existing tenant, so subsequent reads and writes for that tenant run against the other tenant&amp;#39;s data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects ash_postgres: from 0.25.0 before 2.13.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-78699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
