<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:53:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-344042</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344042</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-344042</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344042</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-66883</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-66883</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (Oidcc.Plug.Authorize module) renders the user agent session binding inert, removing a defense in depth control against replay of a stolen session.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex and lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex, and program routines Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 and Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 reads the initiating client&amp;#39;s user agent with get_req_header(conn, &amp;#34;User-Agent&amp;#34;). Plug lowercases incoming header names, but get_req_header/2 matches the supplied key exactly and performs no normalization of its own, so the mixed-case lookup always returns an empty list and nil is written into the session. On the callback side, Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback treats a stored nil user agent as nothing to compare and returns :ok without inspecting the request. The two behaviours combine so that the check passes unconditionally on every request, including for deployments that explicitly opted in with check_useragent: true, and an authorization callback can be completed from a different user agent than the one that initiated the flow without detection. The check fails open silently, with no error and no log entry, so a deployment cannot tell the binding is absent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The impact is limited to defense in depth. The inert check does not by itself allow an attacker to complete an authorization flow; i…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (Oidcc.Plug.Authorize module) renders the user agent session binding inert, removing a defense in depth control against replay of a stolen session.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex and lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex, and program routines Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 and Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 reads the initiating client&amp;#39;s user agent with get_req_header(conn, &amp;#34;User-Agent&amp;#34;). Plug lowercases incoming header names, but get_req_header/2 matches the supplied key exactly and performs no normalization of its own, so the mixed-case lookup always returns an empty list and nil is written into the session. On the callback side, Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback treats a stored nil user agent as nothing to compare and returns :ok without inspecting the request. The two behaviours combine so that the check passes unconditionally on every request, including for deployments that explicitly opted in with check_useragent: true, and an authorization callback can be completed from a different user agent than the one that initiated the flow without detection. The check fails open silently, with no error and no log entry, so a deployment cannot tell the binding is absent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The impact is limited to defense in depth. The inert check does not by itself allow an attacker to complete an authorization flow; i…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-66883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
