<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 11:47:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-357434</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-357434</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-357434</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-357434</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-59992</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-59992</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to next-tinacms-s3 23.0.4, next-tinacms-dos 23.0.4, next-tinacms-azure 14.0.4, and next-tinacms-cloudinary 26.0.4, the first-party production media adapters pass attacker-controlled object keys to storage SDK upload and delete operations without enforcing the operator&amp;#39;s configured mediaRoot. In packages/next-tinacms-s3/src/handlers.ts, createMediaHandler accepts req.query.key for a signed PutObject URL and the DELETE path uses req.query.media as the DeleteObjectCommand key. The same missing key-boundary check exists in packages/next-tinacms-dos/src/handlers.ts, packages/next-tinacms-azure/src/handlers.ts, and packages/next-tinacms-cloudinary/src/handlers.ts. An authenticated CMS editor can therefore create or delete objects anywhere the deployment&amp;#39;s storage credential can reach, including other tenants&amp;#39; or non-media objects. These issues are fixed in next-tinacms-s3 23.0.4, next-tinacms-dos 23.0.4, next-tinacms-azure 14.0.4, and next-tinacms-cloudinary 26.0.4.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to next-tinacms-s3 23.0.4, next-tinacms-dos 23.0.4, next-tinacms-azure 14.0.4, and next-tinacms-cloudinary 26.0.4, the first-party production media adapters pass attacker-controlled object keys to storage SDK upload and delete operations without enforcing the operator&amp;#39;s configured mediaRoot. In packages/next-tinacms-s3/src/handlers.ts, createMediaHandler accepts req.query.key for a signed PutObject URL and the DELETE path uses req.query.media as the DeleteObjectCommand key. The same missing key-boundary check exists in packages/next-tinacms-dos/src/handlers.ts, packages/next-tinacms-azure/src/handlers.ts, and packages/next-tinacms-cloudinary/src/handlers.ts. An authenticated CMS editor can therefore create or delete objects anywhere the deployment&amp;#39;s storage credential can reach, including other tenants&amp;#39; or non-media objects. These issues are fixed in next-tinacms-s3 23.0.4, next-tinacms-dos 23.0.4, next-tinacms-azure 14.0.4, and next-tinacms-cloudinary 26.0.4.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-59992</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-8mq9-5fw2-5rm4 — Tina: Broken Access Control: arbitrary bucket-key write/delete in `next-tinacms-s3` (and sibling production media adapt…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8mq9-5fw2-5rm4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: next-tinacms-s3, npm: next-tinacms-dos, npm: next-tinacms-azure, npm: next-tinacms-cloudinary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The production media handler shipped by `next-tinacms-s3` (`createMediaHandler` in `packages/next-tinacms-s3/src/handlers.ts`) accepts an attacker-chosen `?key=` query parameter and returns an AWS-signed `PutObject` URL whose `Key` is that value, with no check that the key falls under the operator&amp;#39;s configured `mediaRoot`. The same handler&amp;#39;s `DELETE` branch reads `objectKey = (req.query.media as string[])[1]` and dispatches a `DeleteObjectCommand` for that exact key, again unbounded by `mediaRoot`. Any caller that passes the operator-supplied `authorized()` predicate — i.e. any logged-in CMS editor in a typical TinaCloud / self-hosted deployment — therefore has write and delete authority over the *entire* S3 bucket the IAM key can reach, even though the package documents `mediaRoot` as the place where editors are scoped. The same shape is present in `next-tinacms-dos`, `next-tinacms-azure`, and `next-tinacms-cloudinary`, so a single design mistake spans every first-party production media backend.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* Project: TinaCMS — first-party production media adapters (consumed by self-hosted Next.js sites and TinaCloud-backed deployments).
* Source reviewed: `tinacms/tinacms` @ `main` (`b56dad4`).
* Deployed artefact validated: `next-tinacms-s3@21.0.3` handler logic, exercised against `@aws-sdk/client-s3@3.665.x` via `aws-sdk-client-mock@4.1.0` (the AWS SDK signs the URL identically whether the bucket is real or mocked).
* Affected file(s):
  * `packages/next-tinacms-s3/src/…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: next-tinacms-s3, npm: next-tinacms-dos, npm: next-tinacms-azure, npm: next-tinacms-cloudinary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The production media handler shipped by `next-tinacms-s3` (`createMediaHandler` in `packages/next-tinacms-s3/src/handlers.ts`) accepts an attacker-chosen `?key=` query parameter and returns an AWS-signed `PutObject` URL whose `Key` is that value, with no check that the key falls under the operator&amp;#39;s configured `mediaRoot`. The same handler&amp;#39;s `DELETE` branch reads `objectKey = (req.query.media as string[])[1]` and dispatches a `DeleteObjectCommand` for that exact key, again unbounded by `mediaRoot`. Any caller that passes the operator-supplied `authorized()` predicate — i.e. any logged-in CMS editor in a typical TinaCloud / self-hosted deployment — therefore has write and delete authority over the *entire* S3 bucket the IAM key can reach, even though the package documents `mediaRoot` as the place where editors are scoped. The same shape is present in `next-tinacms-dos`, `next-tinacms-azure`, and `next-tinacms-cloudinary`, so a single design mistake spans every first-party production media backend.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* Project: TinaCMS — first-party production media adapters (consumed by self-hosted Next.js sites and TinaCloud-backed deployments).
* Source reviewed: `tinacms/tinacms` @ `main` (`b56dad4`).
* Deployed artefact validated: `next-tinacms-s3@21.0.3` handler logic, exercised against `@aws-sdk/client-s3@3.665.x` via `aws-sdk-client-mock@4.1.0` (the AWS SDK signs the URL identically whether the bucket is real or mocked).
* Affected file(s):
  * `packages/next-tinacms-s3/src/…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8mq9-5fw2-5rm4</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
