<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 17:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-332292</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-332292</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-332292</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-332292</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-58399</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-58399</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;@acastellon/auth is an authentication control system for microservices. Versions prior to 2.3.0 appear to allow an unauthenticated authentication bypass in validateToken() through spoofable auth-user and Host request headers. The validateToken middleware contains a service-to-service bypass for auth-user: service-brother when req.get(&amp;#39;host&amp;#39;).startsWith(getHostName()). Both values involved in the check can be influenced by an unauthenticated HTTP client: auth-user is a request header, and Host is also client-controlled. As a result, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a request with crafted headers and bypass token validation before the normal legacy/JWT/OIDC validation logic runs. A fix has been implemented in v2.3.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;@acastellon/auth is an authentication control system for microservices. Versions prior to 2.3.0 appear to allow an unauthenticated authentication bypass in validateToken() through spoofable auth-user and Host request headers. The validateToken middleware contains a service-to-service bypass for auth-user: service-brother when req.get(&amp;#39;host&amp;#39;).startsWith(getHostName()). Both values involved in the check can be influenced by an unauthenticated HTTP client: auth-user is a request header, and Host is also client-controlled. As a result, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a request with crafted headers and bypass token validation before the normal legacy/JWT/OIDC validation logic runs. A fix has been implemented in v2.3.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-58399</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-gfj5-979r-92pw — @acastellon/auth: Authentication bypass via spoofable headers in validateToken()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-gfj5-979r-92pw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: @acastellon/auth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@acastellon/auth v2.2.0 appears to allow an unauthenticated authentication bypass in validateToken() through spoofable auth-user and Host request headers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The validateToken middleware contains a service-to-service bypass for auth-user: service-brother when req.get(&amp;#39;host&amp;#39;).startsWith(getHostName()). Both values involved in the check can be influenced by an unauthenticated HTTP client: auth-user is a request header, and Host is also client-controlled. As a result, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a request with crafted headers and bypass token validation before the normal legacy/JWT/OIDC validation logic runs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact:
An attacker may be able to access routes protected by validateToken() without a valid token. In deployments where downstream services trust auth-user or is-* headers, this may also lead to privilege escalation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Affected package:
@acastellon/auth v2.2.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Affected code:
auth.js, validateToken()
The issue is related to the service-brother bypass and getHostName() check.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Example request:
```
GET /protected HTTP/1.1
Host: &amp;lt;configured CNAME or hostname&amp;gt;
auth-user: service-brother
is-admin: true
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Expected behavior:
The request should require a valid authentication token.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actual behavior:
The middleware calls next() before token validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix implemented in v2.3.0+:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Removed the spoofable bypass.
Always sanitize incoming auth-user and is-* headers.
Added mTLS client certificate based service auth (with optional TRUSTED_MTLS_SERVICES allowlist).
Upda…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: @acastellon/auth&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@acastellon/auth v2.2.0 appears to allow an unauthenticated authentication bypass in validateToken() through spoofable auth-user and Host request headers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The validateToken middleware contains a service-to-service bypass for auth-user: service-brother when req.get(&amp;#39;host&amp;#39;).startsWith(getHostName()). Both values involved in the check can be influenced by an unauthenticated HTTP client: auth-user is a request header, and Host is also client-controlled. As a result, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a request with crafted headers and bypass token validation before the normal legacy/JWT/OIDC validation logic runs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact:
An attacker may be able to access routes protected by validateToken() without a valid token. In deployments where downstream services trust auth-user or is-* headers, this may also lead to privilege escalation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Affected package:
@acastellon/auth v2.2.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Affected code:
auth.js, validateToken()
The issue is related to the service-brother bypass and getHostName() check.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Example request:
```
GET /protected HTTP/1.1
Host: &amp;lt;configured CNAME or hostname&amp;gt;
auth-user: service-brother
is-admin: true
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Expected behavior:
The request should require a valid authentication token.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actual behavior:
The middleware calls next() before token validation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix implemented in v2.3.0+:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Removed the spoofable bypass.
Always sanitize incoming auth-user and is-* headers.
Added mTLS client certificate based service auth (with optional TRUSTED_MTLS_SERVICES allowlist).
Upda…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-gfj5-979r-92pw</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
