<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 13:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-338040</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-338040</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-338040</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-338040</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-54560</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-54560</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. From 4.12.0 until 4.16.1, Cloudreve&amp;#39;s OAuth access tokens are issued without the OAuth client_id claim, so the JWT verifier does not load token scopes into request context and RequiredScopes treats the request like non-scoped session authentication, allowing a low-scope OAuth access token to call APIs requiring higher scopes such as file, share, workflow, user setting, WebDAV account, and potentially admin scopes. This issue is fixed in version 4.16.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Cloudreve is a self-hosted file management and sharing system. From 4.12.0 until 4.16.1, Cloudreve&amp;#39;s OAuth access tokens are issued without the OAuth client_id claim, so the JWT verifier does not load token scopes into request context and RequiredScopes treats the request like non-scoped session authentication, allowing a low-scope OAuth access token to call APIs requiring higher scopes such as file, share, workflow, user setting, WebDAV account, and potentially admin scopes. This issue is fixed in version 4.16.1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-54560</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-vgj4-345g-jcf8 — Cloudreve: OAuth access tokens bypass scope enforcement due to missing client_id claim</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vgj4-345g-jcf8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudreve&amp;#39;s OAuth access tokens can bypass OAuth scope enforcement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This does not appear to be the intended design. The documentation describes OAuth client permissions/scopes, the API
  has an insufficient-scope error code, and the code comments say `RequiredScopes(...)` should verify scopes when a
  token has scopes, while skipping checks only for non-scoped session-based authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, OAuth access tokens are issued without the OAuth `client_id` claim. Later, the JWT verifier only loads scopes
  into the request context when `claims.ClientID != &amp;#34;&amp;#34;`. Because the OAuth access token has no `client_id`, its scopes
  are not loaded, and `RequiredScopes(...)` treats the request like a non-scoped first-party/session token and skips
  scope checks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, a low-scope OAuth access token, for example one granted only `openid`, can call APIs requiring higher
  scopes such as file, share, workflow, user setting, WebDAV account, and potentially admin scopes when the authorizing
  user is an administrator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Why this seems unintended&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudreve appears to have an explicit OAuth scope model:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The official docs describe OAuth client permissions/scopes and require the authorization request to include
  requested scopes.
  2. The API error code list includes an OAuth insufficient-scope error.
  3. `RequiredScopes(...)` is used across sensitive API groups such as files, shares, workflows, user settings, WebDAV
  devices, and admin APIs.
  4.…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudreve&amp;#39;s OAuth access tokens can bypass OAuth scope enforcement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This does not appear to be the intended design. The documentation describes OAuth client permissions/scopes, the API
  has an insufficient-scope error code, and the code comments say `RequiredScopes(...)` should verify scopes when a
  token has scopes, while skipping checks only for non-scoped session-based authentication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, OAuth access tokens are issued without the OAuth `client_id` claim. Later, the JWT verifier only loads scopes
  into the request context when `claims.ClientID != &amp;#34;&amp;#34;`. Because the OAuth access token has no `client_id`, its scopes
  are not loaded, and `RequiredScopes(...)` treats the request like a non-scoped first-party/session token and skips
  scope checks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a result, a low-scope OAuth access token, for example one granted only `openid`, can call APIs requiring higher
  scopes such as file, share, workflow, user setting, WebDAV account, and potentially admin scopes when the authorizing
  user is an administrator.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Why this seems unintended&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cloudreve appears to have an explicit OAuth scope model:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The official docs describe OAuth client permissions/scopes and require the authorization request to include
  requested scopes.
  2. The API error code list includes an OAuth insufficient-scope error.
  3. `RequiredScopes(...)` is used across sensitive API groups such as files, shares, workflows, user settings, WebDAV
  devices, and admin APIs.
  4.…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vgj4-345g-jcf8</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
