<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 11:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-329803</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-329803</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-329803</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-329803</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-53928</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53928</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, a stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh JWTs even after the user reset their password. passwordChange and passwordReset deleted the user&amp;#39;s refresh tokens, but passwordForgot only rotated token_version and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id). An attacker holding a captured refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim triggered the recovery flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;NocoDB is software for building databases as spreadsheets. Prior to 2026.05.1, a stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh JWTs even after the user reset their password. passwordChange and passwordReset deleted the user&amp;#39;s refresh tokens, but passwordForgot only rotated token_version and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not call UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id). An attacker holding a captured refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim triggered the recovery flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.05.1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53928</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-r989-7g3j-wjhw — NocoDB: Refresh Tokens Persist Through Password Recovery</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r989-7g3j-wjhw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: nocodb&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
A stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh
JWTs even after the user reset their password.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
`passwordChange` and `passwordReset` deleted the user&amp;#39;s refresh tokens, but
`passwordForgot` only rotated `token_version` and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not
call `UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id)`. An attacker holding a captured
refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim
triggered the recovery flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Persistent unauthorized access after password recovery. Once a refresh token leaks, the
documented &amp;#34;Forgot password&amp;#34; recovery flow did not in fact revoke the attacker&amp;#39;s
session.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Credit
This issue was reported by [@bugbunny-research](https://github.com/bugbunny-research).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: nocodb&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
A stolen refresh token survived a password-forgot flow and could be used to mint fresh
JWTs even after the user reset their password.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
`passwordChange` and `passwordReset` deleted the user&amp;#39;s refresh tokens, but
`passwordForgot` only rotated `token_version` and revoked OAuth tokens — it did not
call `UserRefreshToken.deleteAllUserToken(user.id)`. An attacker holding a captured
refresh cookie could still exchange it for a new access token after the victim
triggered the recovery flow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Persistent unauthorized access after password recovery. Once a refresh token leaks, the
documented &amp;#34;Forgot password&amp;#34; recovery flow did not in fact revoke the attacker&amp;#39;s
session.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Credit
This issue was reported by [@bugbunny-research](https://github.com/bugbunny-research).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r989-7g3j-wjhw</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
