<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 06:50:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-357517</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-357517</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-357517</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-357517</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-53425</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53425</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in dropbox samly allows an attacker to establish an authenticated session using a SAML response the service provider never requested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Samly.SPHandler.validate_authresp/3 in lib/samly/sp_handler.ex validates a SAML response for the SP-initiated flow by comparing only the RelayState value, the IdP identifier, and the presence of a target URL held in the session. It never compares SubjectConfirmationData/@InResponseTo against the ID of the AuthnRequest the service provider issued, and that request ID is never persisted, so no comparison is possible. SAML 2.0 Core section 4.1.4.3 requires a service provider to reject a response whose InResponseTo does not match a request it made. The underlying esaml library checks status, signature, recipient, audience, and staleness, but likewise never inspects InResponseTo, so nothing else closes the gap. Exploitation requires a validly signed assertion from the trusted IdP, which an attacker can obtain for their own account, and a RelayState matching the victim&amp;#39;s session; the assertion signature itself remains intact, so this is not a signature-forgery issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects samly: from 0.3.0 onward.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in dropbox samly allows an attacker to establish an authenticated session using a SAML response the service provider never requested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Samly.SPHandler.validate_authresp/3 in lib/samly/sp_handler.ex validates a SAML response for the SP-initiated flow by comparing only the RelayState value, the IdP identifier, and the presence of a target URL held in the session. It never compares SubjectConfirmationData/@InResponseTo against the ID of the AuthnRequest the service provider issued, and that request ID is never persisted, so no comparison is possible. SAML 2.0 Core section 4.1.4.3 requires a service provider to reject a response whose InResponseTo does not match a request it made. The underlying esaml library checks status, signature, recipient, audience, and staleness, but likewise never inspects InResponseTo, so nothing else closes the gap. Exploitation requires a validly signed assertion from the trusted IdP, which an attacker can obtain for their own account, and a RelayState matching the victim&amp;#39;s session; the assertion signature itself remains intact, so this is not a signature-forgery issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects samly: from 0.3.0 onward.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53425</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-4mhx-38g6-r4wq</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4mhx-38g6-r4wq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in dropbox samly allows an attacker to establish an authenticated session using a SAML response the service provider never requested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Samly.SPHandler.validate_authresp/3 in lib/samly/sp_handler.ex validates a SAML response for the SP-initiated flow by comparing only the RelayState value, the IdP identifier, and the presence of a target URL held in the session. It never compares SubjectConfirmationData/@InResponseTo against the ID of the AuthnRequest the service provider issued, and that request ID is never persisted, so no comparison is possible. SAML 2.0 Core section 4.1.4.3 requires a service provider to reject a response whose InResponseTo does not match a request it made. The underlying esaml library checks status, signature, recipient, audience, and staleness, but likewise never inspects InResponseTo, so nothing else closes the gap. Exploitation requires a validly signed assertion from the trusted IdP, which an attacker can obtain for their own account, and a RelayState matching the victim&amp;#39;s session; the assertion signature itself remains intact, so this is not a signature-forgery issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects samly: from v0.3.0 onward.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in dropbox samly allows an attacker to establish an authenticated session using a SAML response the service provider never requested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Samly.SPHandler.validate_authresp/3 in lib/samly/sp_handler.ex validates a SAML response for the SP-initiated flow by comparing only the RelayState value, the IdP identifier, and the presence of a target URL held in the session. It never compares SubjectConfirmationData/@InResponseTo against the ID of the AuthnRequest the service provider issued, and that request ID is never persisted, so no comparison is possible. SAML 2.0 Core section 4.1.4.3 requires a service provider to reject a response whose InResponseTo does not match a request it made. The underlying esaml library checks status, signature, recipient, audience, and staleness, but likewise never inspects InResponseTo, so nothing else closes the gap. Exploitation requires a validly signed assertion from the trusted IdP, which an attacker can obtain for their own account, and a RelayState matching the victim&amp;#39;s session; the assertion signature itself remains intact, so this is not a signature-forgery issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects samly: from v0.3.0 onward.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-4mhx-38g6-r4wq</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
