<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 15:08:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-332329</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-332329</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-332329</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-332329</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-50280</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-50280</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 and above prior to 5.9.21, the EntriesController::actionMoveToSection() endpoint gates the destination section only by viewEntries:$section-&amp;gt;uid rather than requiring saveEntries permission (the source entry is separately checked via Entry::canMove()). As a result, a low-privileged authenticated control-panel user who can move an entry out of its current section can call moveEntryToSection() to rewrite the entry&amp;#39;s sectionId and save it into a section where they have read access but no write access. This breaks the section-level authorization model, letting a user with limited permissions inject content into a protected section and interfere with editorial boundaries, approval workflows, and section-specific business logic. This issue has been fixed in version 5.9.21.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 and above prior to 5.9.21, the EntriesController::actionMoveToSection() endpoint gates the destination section only by viewEntries:$section-&amp;gt;uid rather than requiring saveEntries permission (the source entry is separately checked via Entry::canMove()). As a result, a low-privileged authenticated control-panel user who can move an entry out of its current section can call moveEntryToSection() to rewrite the entry&amp;#39;s sectionId and save it into a section where they have read access but no write access. This breaks the section-level authorization model, letting a user with limited permissions inject content into a protected section and interfere with editorial boundaries, approval workflows, and section-specific business logic. This issue has been fixed in version 5.9.21.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-50280</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-43cq-c2gq-pfpw — Craft CMS: Authorization bypass in `entries/move-to-section` via missing target-section save check</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-43cq-c2gq-pfpw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Packagist: craftcms/cms&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `EntriesController::actionMoveToSection()` endpoint checks only whether the current user can view the destination section, but it does not require permission to save entries into that section. A low-privileged authenticated control-panel user who can move an entry out of its current section can therefore move that entry into a different section where they have read access but no write access.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vulnerable route is implemented in [EntriesController.php](/D:/files/projects/cms-5.9.19/cms-5.9.19/src/controllers/EntriesController.php):465:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The destination check is only `viewEntries:$section-&amp;gt;uid` . The source-entry gate is `Entry::canMove()`, which verifies whether the user can move the existing entry based on the source section:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This closes the exploit chain:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. External source: authenticated CP request to `entries/move-to-section`.
2. Missing authorization check: destination section requires only `viewEntries`, not `saveEntries`.
3. Privileged sink: `moveEntryToSection()` rewrites `sectionId` and saves the entry into the unauthorized section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Preconditions derived from the code:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The attacker is authenticated to the control panel.
2. Entry `345` is movable by the attacker from its current section.
3. The attacker can satisfy `viewEntries` on destination section `12`.
4. The attacker does not have `saveEntries:DESTINATION_UID`, which is the missing check that makes the bypass possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The controller accepts the request becau…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Packagist: craftcms/cms&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The `EntriesController::actionMoveToSection()` endpoint checks only whether the current user can view the destination section, but it does not require permission to save entries into that section. A low-privileged authenticated control-panel user who can move an entry out of its current section can therefore move that entry into a different section where they have read access but no write access.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vulnerable route is implemented in [EntriesController.php](/D:/files/projects/cms-5.9.19/cms-5.9.19/src/controllers/EntriesController.php):465:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The destination check is only `viewEntries:$section-&amp;gt;uid` . The source-entry gate is `Entry::canMove()`, which verifies whether the user can move the existing entry based on the source section:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This closes the exploit chain:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. External source: authenticated CP request to `entries/move-to-section`.
2. Missing authorization check: destination section requires only `viewEntries`, not `saveEntries`.
3. Privileged sink: `moveEntryToSection()` rewrites `sectionId` and saves the entry into the unauthorized section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Preconditions derived from the code:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The attacker is authenticated to the control panel.
2. Entry `345` is movable by the attacker from its current section.
3. The attacker can satisfy `viewEntries` on destination section `12`.
4. The attacker does not have `saveEntries:DESTINATION_UID`, which is the missing check that makes the bypass possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Result:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The controller accepts the request becau…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-43cq-c2gq-pfpw</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
