<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 04:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-341312</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-341312</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-341312</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-341312</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-48037</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-48037</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hulumi is an open-source toolkit that ships secure-by-default cloud and platform infrastructure components for Pulumi. Prior to version 1.4.0, AccountFoundation reuse paths silently downgrade GuardDuty / Security Hub posture. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Hulumi is an open-source toolkit that ships secure-by-default cloud and platform infrastructure components for Pulumi. Prior to version 1.4.0, AccountFoundation reuse paths silently downgrade GuardDuty / Security Hub posture. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-48037</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-cj8g-prcm-mfg5 — @hulumi/baseline: AccountFoundation reuse paths silently downgrade GuardDuty / Security Hub posture</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cj8g-prcm-mfg5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: @hulumi/baseline&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**Affected:** `@hulumi/baseline` `&amp;lt; 1.4.0` — **Fixed in:** `1.4.0` — **Severity:** Medium — **CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure)**&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`AccountFoundation` can either create AWS detective services (GuardDuty for threat detection, Security Hub for compliance dashboards) or reuse pre-existing ones via opt-in flags. The reuse paths just imported the existing resources and reported success — they never checked whether the existing services were actually doing their job.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. **GuardDuty reuse.** If the existing detector was suspended, or set to the slower 6-hour publishing cadence instead of the baseline 15-minute one, or otherwise misconfigured — Hulumi never noticed. The deployment succeeded with a misleadingly-positive `guardDutyDetectorId` output as if the baseline were active.
2. **Security Hub reuse.** Although the account import was read-only, Hulumi unconditionally created the CIS / NIST `StandardsSubscription` resources with default delete behaviour. Pulumi then treated those subscriptions as its own — a later `pulumi destroy` of the stack would call `BatchDisableStandards`, unsubscribing the account from CIS / NIST compliance monitoring even on accounts that had those subscriptions before Hulumi ever ran.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consumers using `AccountFoundation`&amp;#39;s reuse mode could:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- ship deployments that appeared to enable a detective baseline but actually weren&amp;#39;t (case 1), or
- accidentally turn off CIS / NIST compliance monitoring on an existing account just b…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: @hulumi/baseline&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;**Affected:** `@hulumi/baseline` `&amp;lt; 1.4.0` — **Fixed in:** `1.4.0` — **Severity:** Medium — **CWE-693 (Protection Mechanism Failure)**&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`AccountFoundation` can either create AWS detective services (GuardDuty for threat detection, Security Hub for compliance dashboards) or reuse pre-existing ones via opt-in flags. The reuse paths just imported the existing resources and reported success — they never checked whether the existing services were actually doing their job.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. **GuardDuty reuse.** If the existing detector was suspended, or set to the slower 6-hour publishing cadence instead of the baseline 15-minute one, or otherwise misconfigured — Hulumi never noticed. The deployment succeeded with a misleadingly-positive `guardDutyDetectorId` output as if the baseline were active.
2. **Security Hub reuse.** Although the account import was read-only, Hulumi unconditionally created the CIS / NIST `StandardsSubscription` resources with default delete behaviour. Pulumi then treated those subscriptions as its own — a later `pulumi destroy` of the stack would call `BatchDisableStandards`, unsubscribing the account from CIS / NIST compliance monitoring even on accounts that had those subscriptions before Hulumi ever ran.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;#### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consumers using `AccountFoundation`&amp;#39;s reuse mode could:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- ship deployments that appeared to enable a detective baseline but actually weren&amp;#39;t (case 1), or
- accidentally turn off CIS / NIST compliance monitoring on an existing account just b…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cj8g-prcm-mfg5</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
